It was raiding an ENTIRE APARTMENT BUILDING in Chicago like they were storming a building in Fallujah.
It was flashbang grenades being tossed, windows smashed out, doors kicked open - troops with weapons drawn - raiding AN ENTIRE APARTMENT COMPLEX.
And you’re here splitting hairs about it instead of flat out condemning it, why exactly?
Well, the post that sort of
started that discussion insisted this looked like Nazi Germany, and I
do think there is a difference between "
Law enforcement raided a large building and (presumably) wrongfully arrested a bunch of people" and "
The government has initiated the en masse annihilation of all Jews, Roma, the mentally and physically unfit, and anyone who objects."
I also pointed out this was not the first time we've dealt with militarized law enforcement doing things like smashing into buildings and even shooting people, and that made people very upset.
As I laid out:
The point remains that there is clear precedent for militarized law enforcement in this country, and pretending to be shocked now - and only when its wielded by members of the other Tribe - is ridiculous.
1. A thing can be bad without it being Nazi Germany. "Nazi" is not a synonym for "thing I don't like" or "thing that is bad".
2. A thing can be bad and have precedent - as a nation we've been through far more abusive Presidents than this one.
3. A thing can have precedent and still be bad and wrong.
As for ICE raids - the point is clearly to maximize self-deportation. As a strategy, that makes sense. Denying Due Process is still wrong, and the Administration has stepped out way over their skis in doing so. Both those things can be true at the same time without us having to descend into hysterics.
On what grounds can you justify this in ANY way, shape or form?
I'm not in here justifying
any abuse of US Citizens' constitutional rights. However, I am also not setting my hair on fire and pretending that this is
Literally Hitler, and that seems to have upset people who don't understand the ability to think that a thing was wrong without labeling it as "Nazi Germany".
I'm not partaking in an emotional melt-down, and I point out that we've done bad things before, and so people are assuming therefore I must support the abuse of others' rights, because this signals that I'm not of their "tribe", and they have difficulty imagining that anyone who is not in Blue Tribe would not therefore be a member of MAGA Tribe
For example, see
@Luce:
MAGAs are MAGAs, they are each the same in beliefs and nobody can smell the difference between any two of them.
The fact that some of them are somewhat articulate doesn't mitigate this. In fact, it makes them even more culpable.
Because he LIKES it.
Now, I've been Never Trump since before there was a name for it. I was the
first person on this board to label and call out Trump's movement as having fascistic tendencies, all the way back in 2015, when the Left thought that Rubio and Cruz were the Real Threats and Trump was hilarious. I've never voted for the man, supported both impeachments, very clearly laid out where he broke federal law (when I thought he did so, which was not the same as "every time he was accused of doing so"), and consider him a Domestic Enemy of the Constitution.
But
@Luce isn't able (or willing) to understand anyone who doesn't signal membership in Blue Tribe by going into hysterics over raids on buildings
not being MAGA Tribe, so, he does this little psuedo-accusation thing of me of being MAGA.
@Bok Tuklo did a form of it as well, except, instead of simply assuming anyone who disagrees with him is MAGA, he assumes anyone who disagrees with him is:
Yeah, you are lying.
I suspected you would embrace fascism; your racist approval of summarily executing Black people and dehumanizing of women was a tell.
A fascist, racist, murdering, misogynist liar.
