• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ICE Agents Won’t Comply With California’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Face Mask Ban: DHS

They want you unmasked so they can shoot you.
 
Question for the group: If I am approached by an armed man wearing a mask, with no identification, and this man attempts to abduct me, am I justified in resisting violently?
Go for it. And send us pics of how it ends just in case we missed you on TV
 
You would have been a redcoat, wouldn't you?

The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.”

Excuse me, did you just make a reference inferring that any American male or female who has served or is currently serving in the U.S. Military is an "instrument of tyranny?!"

Are you serious, or just clueless?
 
Go for it. And send us pics of how it ends just in case we missed you on TV
Why not answer the question. Can I resist a kidnapping by an unidentified person?
 
Of course this was on everyones Bingo Card

Newscum and go cluck himself.

====================================

"DHS called California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new law unconstitutional and vowed agents will keep wearing masks on immigration raids."

View attachment 67591124

"Protesters confront federal police during a demonstration outside an immigration processing center in Broadview, Ill., on Sept. 12, 2025. Scott Olson/Getty Images

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Sept. 22 that it will defy California’s new law banning federal immigration agents and other law enforcement personnel from wearing face masks while on duty.

“To be clear: We will NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS said in a social media post."
"
DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused California Gov. Gavin Newsom of “fanning the flames of division, hatred, and dehumanization of our law enforcement” by signing the ban."

Just say you're worried about COVID-19.

Either nobody can wear masks in public or everyone can there's no special rule.
 
My entire life, down here in the South, I've heard men talk about how we're armed to protect "the people" from Federal Goverment tyranny. Which would include following our laws.

Then you blink your eyes and those same people are cheering masked FEDS snatching people off the streets in the middle of the night where some end up in foreign torture prisons with no due process.

Just another massive Republican lie.
 
Yes but if they identify themselves as law enforcement and you still try to escape you can be charged with an additional penalty of fleeing arrest.
Fair enough. But their identification need to go beyond saying “I’m a cop.” As we learned in the Treasure of the Sierra Madre, cops “DO got to show you their sinking badges.”
 
Of course this was on everyones Bingo Card

Newscum and go cluck himself.

====================================

"DHS called California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new law unconstitutional and vowed agents will keep wearing masks on immigration raids."

View attachment 67591124

"Protesters confront federal police during a demonstration outside an immigration processing center in Broadview, Ill., on Sept. 12, 2025. Scott Olson/Getty Images

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Sept. 22 that it will defy California’s new law banning federal immigration agents and other law enforcement personnel from wearing face masks while on duty.

“To be clear: We will NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS said in a social media post."
"
DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused California Gov. Gavin Newsom of “fanning the flames of division, hatred, and dehumanization of our law enforcement” by signing the ban."

I would just have them arrested for violating California law. There is no Federal Law that gives them the right to cover their faces and not have identification readily available.
 
Correct. The purpose of denying ICE agents masks is to first identify name, address, and any other contact information. Followed by publicly posting it (doxxing) seeking to encourage harassment by other "activists" who will then attempt to "terrorize" the Agents via any means necessary. It could even lead to "activated" lunatics (like the recent shooters with Charlie Kirk and the Dallas ICE facility).

IMO this is EXACTLY what many Democrats (or at least the various "leaders" at Federal, State, and Local levels) hope to incite by the constant demonizing of I.C.E. and their various agents.
I find it interesting that it is okay for them to act like thugs knowing that they cannot be identified, so even it you wanted to bring suit if they manhandled you cannot because how would you know which one did it. The idea is for them to protect the public as with the police, rather than we should protect them from their actions.
 
I would just have them arrested for violating California law. There is no Federal Law that gives them the right to cover their faces and not have identification readily available.
I pray you’re right.
 
What are they so scared of? Real cops arrest bad people daily without hiding their faces.
They are afraid of leftists hunting them down and murdering them and their families when they are off duty.
 
The Great Spraytan. The Orange Shitgibbon. Adolf Twitler. Orange Julius Ceasar. Bumbledore. Cheese Puff. Darth Taxevader. Jabba the Smut. Temu Mussolini. Il Douche.
So between 7th and 11th grade.
 
Interesting debate on the supremacy clause of the constitution...

I wonder how the law will shake out, if a state will be allowed to override the federal government.
 
Interesting debate on the supremacy clause of the constitution...

I wonder how the law will shake out, if a state will be allowed to override the federal government.

There must be precedent on whether federal agents, or bounty hunters, can break state law with impunity.
 
Why not answer the question. Can I resist a kidnapping by an unidentified person?
You can do whatever you want. Just take pics for us afterwords because we would be worried about you.

It might not make television.
 
Fair enough. But their identification need to go beyond saying “I’m a cop.” As we learned in the Treasure of the Sierra Madre, cops “DO got to show you their sinking badges.”
Well they could be wearing a fake uniform they can have a fake badge.

At some point they will need to force you. You'll know their police when you go to jail.
 
Masks were bad now they are good
 
There must be precedent on whether federal agents, or bounty hunters, can break state law with impunity.
Yes, I think there is.

Most people have heard of the supremacy clause.
 
Of course this was on everyones Bingo Card

Newscum and go cluck himself.

====================================

"DHS called California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new law unconstitutional and vowed agents will keep wearing masks on immigration raids."

View attachment 67591124

"Protesters confront federal police during a demonstration outside an immigration processing center in Broadview, Ill., on Sept. 12, 2025. Scott Olson/Getty Images

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Sept. 22 that it will defy California’s new law banning federal immigration agents and other law enforcement personnel from wearing face masks while on duty.

“To be clear: We will NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” DHS said in a social media post."
"
DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused California Gov. Gavin Newsom of “fanning the flames of division, hatred, and dehumanization of our law enforcement” by signing the ban."

During Covid, Weren't you Mr anti-forced mask policy and crying that asking people to wear masks in public spaces was equivalent to government tyranny?
 
During Covid, Weren't you Mr anti-forced mask policy and crying that asking people to wear masks in public spaces was equivalent to government tyranny?
Those were demands.
 
What are they so scared of? Real cops arrest bad people daily without hiding their faces.
Yes, but we aren't acting like gestapo.
 
Those were demands.
Right.
Now you're ok with thugs wearing face diapers as you called them, because they're entertaining you by beating the shit out of people that you hate.
 
Right.
Now you're ok with thugs wearing face diapers as you called them, because they're entertaining you by beating the shit out of people that you hate.
Those of course are your words. 🤣
 
Back
Top Bottom