BirdinHand
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 47,421
- Reaction score
- 88,375
- Gender
- Female
So, if you’re in Laos and they’re in the US…seems you did give up your guns.no, they stay in the US
So, if you’re in Laos and they’re in the US…seems you did give up your guns.no, they stay in the US
not quite, as i can acquire them any time I want.So, if you’re in Laos and they’re in the US…seems you did give up your guns.
You can acquire guns any time you want living in Laos?not quite, as i can acquire them any time I want.
I can do the same in the United States. Been living here for 56 years, never once been robbed, mugged, shot at, or had my house broken into. I do have firearms, but never had to use one for defense, not even close.Nope, but I understand crime statistics.
In Asia, mostly safe. Can walk around any part of the city day or night with money strapped to me and not worry about being violently robbed.
I can leave my door unlocked.
etc.
You can acquire guns any time you want living in Laos?
Why don’t you then?
I can do the same in the United States. Been living here for 56 years, never once been robbed, mugged, shot at, or had my house broken into. I do have firearms, but never had to use one for defense, not even close.
Democracy is mob rule.
Are you saying all of Laos is safe? No higher levels of crime in population centers?Depends on where on lives. Living in bum fug wyoming vs living in south side chicago..... well I am sure you can see the difference lol
Even in keeping your guns it is impossible that you can guarantee the safety of yourself or your loved ones.the government can guarantee the safety of myself and loved ones.
which is impossible, so hell no to taking my guns.
Funny.Laos is safe. Zero fear of anything here.
Your family is statistically less safe with your guns than without them.the government can guarantee the safety of myself and loved ones.
which is impossible, so hell no to taking my guns.
Funny.
Strict gun laws in Laos, and you don’t feel the need to carry a gun.
Funny how that works.
Even in keeping your guns it is impossible that you can guarantee the safety of yourself or your loved ones.
So, meh.
Registered?Did you tell your government that you had a legitimate reason (eg, hunting) for owning your guns when you registered them or do you have them illegally?
Except your premise isn't true.It's like a vicious cycle isn't it. The guns are what put you in harms way, so you need the gun to protect yourself. At some point we need to break the cycle.
The more guns people buy, the more we are in danger.
OP is posting from Laos, so thought he was a Laos citizen. We have alot of foreigners on this site pretending to be US citizens, not sure this is one.Registered?
If a government agent shows up to collect our gun safe, I'll be very surprised. However, I am beginning to support an idea that i came up with.
Others might have already thought of this because it's fairly obvious. It's a significant tax on ammunition, similar to the tax on cigarettes. It will be used to help children whose parents would have otherwise chosen to abort before the court was instructed to rescind this right. We need to be thinking about this, as pro-life does not end at delivery, and bullets kill a lot of people.
In what way? An ammo tax does not infringe on keeping and bearing arms.That might be interpreted as an infringement.
How about a poll tax and voting?In what way? An ammo tax does not infringe on keeping and bearing arms.
How about a poll tax and voting?
So a tax on a right is unconstitutional?
There is a right to keep and bear arms as part of a well regulated militia. It doesn't say anything about ammo.So a tax on a right is unconstitutional?
Don't you people ever remember the thousands of times we've shot down the ammo argument?There is a right to keep and bear arms as part of a well regulated militia. It doesn't say anything about ammo.
Don't you like strict originalism? I thought you guys were all about that. Here, have an awkward and unnecessary comma,.Don't you people ever remember the thousands of times we've shot down the ammo argument?