- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 61,754
- Reaction score
- 30,439
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
And sadly Americans with guns don't just kill criminals...
British with cars don't just drive to work. Sometimes they run over people.
And sadly Americans with guns don't just kill criminals...
British with cars don't just drive to work. Sometimes they run over people.
But at a somewhat lower rate than motorists in the USA do, as British roads are safer.
And if we actually moved onto the question of why that happens it becomes an argument not about guns but about why fear is used so often to control the american people.And sadly Americans with guns don't just kill criminals...
And if we actually moved onto the question of why that happens it becomes an argument not about guns but about why fear is used so often to control the american people.
No, the people in my country saw the sense in banning a gun that has no use other than to kill people.Weren't the people in your country in such terror of a mass shooting that they went along with having a bunch of their guns taken away?
No, the people in my country saw the sense in banning a gun that has no use other than to kill people.
We do not have politicians and gun lobby groups telling us to be so afraid that we should just shoot first and deny after.
Do you have any data showing whether guns are used more for crime than for defense in Britain?
And if we actually moved onto the question of why that happens it becomes an argument not about guns but about why fear is used so often to control the american people.
Go look it up.
Not the point. But the actual point is that the pro-gun crowd are a selfish lot so explaining an act that regards others would ( proven to) be wasted on you.No other use? Geez! How many mass murders were occurring?
No wonder you guys were terrified, with thousands of those guns being used for mass murders.
What did you do with all the thousands of mass murderers?
Not the point. But the actual point is that the pro-gun crowd are a selfish lot so explaining an act that regards others would ( proven to) be wasted on you.
Agreed that it is an issue. Disagree on the direction best taken to do something about the issue.No it doesn't
There are 400+ mass shootings a year, in the USA - a mass shooting being where 4 or more people are shot, but not necessarily killed, not including the shooter(s)
This is the issue.
What do you think was obviously false.Not the point? Then why say something so obviously false?
And you don't have to be so embarrassed about your country's terror that it leads you into ad hominem. But you do you.
What do you think was obviously false.
You still persist in the false claim that the fear I point out equals terror.
So what other use are we talking about here?Your claim about a gun having no use other than to kill people. Obviously false, which is why it lent itself so well to ridicule.
So your countrymen weren't in terror, they were just highly afraid at the urging of their government?
So what other use are we talking about here?
It is your illusion that it was forced on the people. The best you can do is point to a minority of disagreement.
So you don't have that data.
You look up data when it suits you
I guess this is not one of those times![]()
Agreed that it is an issue. Disagree on the direction best taken to do something about the issue.
Not possible as there is no one alternative. There are instead lots of alternatives to the many causes of violence in society. Tackle those and the number of violent attacks will reduce. Just ban guns and you bring back the days of prohibition. Where many will be criminals.So you disagree on the direction
Yet offer no alternative. You sound like a Republican.
Not possible as there is no one alternative. There are instead lots of alternatives to the many causes of violence in society. Tackle those and the number of violent attacks will reduce. Just ban guns and you bring back the days of prohibition. Where many will be criminals.
So there are many cause of violence. Then just give me your best alternative to gun control as a way of reducing it.
Putting regulations on guns will not stop violence, as the two are not cause and effect. Regulating guns will however force gun owners to be more accountable for their guns.So there are many cause of violence. Then just give me your best alternative to gun control as a way of reducing it.
LIke saying the FLA law was 'Don't say gay' billNo, just a lie.