• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I challenge you to identify capitalistic characteristics

I was replying on to the OP.
I understand that, I was just wondering if there is anything I said you found economically illiterate as I also consider myself far left and educated on economics.
 
Which is why militaries are economically neutral.

But your absurd definition of “everything the government does is socialism” won’t allow you to say that.

Make your case of how and why militaries are economically neutral. I say that protecting economic interests is the #1 mission of militaries. The explicit mission of the US Navy is to keep sea lanes open. Why? For economic purposes.
 
I've read your posts. You're far, far left.

If you want to use a flimsy definition of 'far left,' then maybe I'm far left. Is protecting the environment far left? Are human rights far left?


"Far-left politics are politics further to the left of the left–right political spectrum than the standard political left.

There are different definitions of the far-left. Some scholars define it as representing the left of social democracy while others limit it to anarchism, socialism, and communism (or any derivative of Marxism-Leninism). In certain instances, especially in the news media, the term characterizes groups that advocate for revolutionary anti-capitalism and anti-colonialism.

Extremist far-left politics can involve violent acts such as terrorism and the formation of far-left militant organizations meant to abolish capitalist systems and the upper ruling class. Far-left terrorism consists of groups that attempt to realize their radical ideals and bring about change through violence rather than established political processes."
 
So what. Congress has the social power to tax. That makes it socialism not capitalism.

“So what” - says the guy who just had the core of his argument ripped out.

The King of France had the social power to tax. That didn’t make the King socialist.
 
"WOLFF: Socialism is capitalism's critical shadow. Think of them as critics.


GONZALEZ: Socialism is a criticism of capitalism. And, you know, capitalism was really just a criticism of feudalism. And to understand socialism, we get to go back to feudalism, to European feudalism in particular, which starts in the 400s, like year 400. It's the Middle Ages."


"
SMITH: So Karl Marx, he says, this is what we got to do. The workers need to own the means of production. They should own the land, the factory, the tools in some collective way so that they can be their own bosses, have the opportunity to make themselves wealthy, too.


WOLFF: That's what the breakthrough is. That's what the socialism is focused on. No more master-slave, no more lord-serf and no more employer versus employee.


GONZALEZ: This is when socialism becomes known as a criticism of capitalism. And the main thing socialism comes to signify is taking on inequality through some kind of government intervention." {Hmmm, look at that, a socialist economist said (didn't disagree) that socialism ... is ... government intervention."}


 
Last edited:
Make your case of how and why militaries are economically neutral. I say that protecting economic interests is the #1 mission of militaries. The explicit mission of the US Navy is to keep sea lanes open. Why? For economic purposes.

They protect economies, but militaries aren’t not themselves economic.

Militaries aren’t capitalist, socialist, mercantilist, feudalist, fascist, or any other economic system. They exist independent of the economic model of the polity.
 
I understand that, I was just wondering if there is anything I said you found economically illiterate as I also consider myself far left and educated on economics.
Can't say I've been tracking what you say here. If you're wondering about a particular idea you've offered, feel free to cite it.
 
Why do you believe a private sector CEO Is more socialist than a sovereign authority?

Private sector CEO’s use social power to run their companies.

That’s how you are defining socialism. The issue is that your definition is absurd and inaccurate.

Using it, literally everything humans do is socialism because every single person uses “social power”.
 
They protect economies, but militaries aren’t not themselves economic.

Militaries aren’t capitalist, socialist, mercantilist, feudalist, fascist, or any other economic system. They exist independent of the economic model of the polity.

We agree that militaries protect economies.
 
That seems like a fallacy of You making up rhetoric and assuming your own conclusion. What social power are you referring to in the private sector?

The same kind a Congressman has: influence, negotiation, promise of or denial of funding.
 
Can't say I've been tracking what you say here. If you're wondering about a particular idea you've offered, feel free to cite it.
Well for example, my original reply to OP.
 
Back
Top Bottom