• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Human Trafficking Too? Biden Admin Flagged Deported El Salvadoran As 'Suspect Alien' (1 Viewer)

Under which conditions the law applies is written into tje text. It is not limited to a Congressional declaration of war. You don't need to take my word for it. Read the bill.

It is the first invasion emergency where the PotUS helped the invaders.
roflmao


We have been invaded by the people who came here illegally and took jobs Trump is going to allow them to keep

They were aided by the Trump donors who incentivize their immigration by letting them take jobs. Trump is going to allow them to continue employing the people who came here illegally and took jobs.
 
Wartime is not the only time the act can be invoked.
He can't use it for this either. Face the facts. Trump is wrong. Every judge has said so including the 9-0 SC decision and now the intelligence community agree.
This is total bullshit brough on by the hatred Trump has ginned up in his Nazi followers.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A new U.S. intelligence assessment found no coordination between Tren de Aragua and the Venezuelan government, contradicting statements that Trump administration officials have made to justify their invocation of the Alien Enemies Act and deporting Venezuelan migrants, according to U.S. officials.

The classified assessment from the National Intelligence Council, released this month, is more comprehensive and authoritative than an earlier intelligence product released Feb. 26 and reported last month by The New York Times, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the assessment. They were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
 
Why wasn't he tried for his crimes then? That's what America pre-Trump would do. America that used to follow the Constitution and not shit all over it.
We can't read minds, but simply put: it's cheaper to kick them out if they're illegals. Some liberals on here want to give every single one of the millions of illegals crossing the border a trial, but there are only about 100k trials in the United States. It's unfeasible, impractical, and not required.
 
We can't read minds, but simply put: it's cheaper to kick them out if they're illegals. Some liberals on here want to give every single one of the millions of illegals crossing the border a trial, but there are only about 100k trials in the United States. It's unfeasible, impractical, and not required.
The SC disagrees with you, along with every other court that has weighed in on this.
 
The SC disagrees with you, along with every other court that has weighed in on this.
So did Biden and Obama give all of them trials, or are they, too, traitorous Constitution violators?
 
The left has abandoned crime victims in favor of criminals

Not a good look.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom