That word has been in common usage since long before the Civil War & during the Tulsa & Ocoee Massacres in the 1920s. There are a lot of words in common usage that are considered unacceptable in classrooms as well as polite society but they are used often in slang & every day usage. But the repugs are making political theater out of them. They (the repugs) don't have enough to do.I agree that word should be deleted.
There is simply no excuse for using that word today.
It could only hurt the feelings of many people.
We should let that word die a natural death.
I disagree.I agree that word should be deleted.
It would be fine to put some disclaimer on books or literary works which contain the N word, to protect those who might be offended - but without changing the actual text of the work.There is simply no excuse for using that word today.
It could only hurt the feelings of many people.
Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word
October 1 - October 7, 2023davenport.libguides.com
CHANGING HUCK FINN
Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.
In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”
You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
While I can agree with the idea that a book such as this should have a warning or disclosure that the language used is not acceptable in today's society, it should not be altered. As long as it is not illegal to own, buy or sell (true censorship), then I could care less who wants to carry it or not. Bookstores will, for the most part, continue to carry it, especially when local book "bans" happen, because people will buy a copy just to spite those wanting to ban the book.Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word
October 1 - October 7, 2023davenport.libguides.com
CHANGING HUCK FINN
Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.
In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”
You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
I hate the 'n-word'. Imo, we would be better served if we tasted the bile rising from using the actual derogatory term. Pretending we didn't live the way people lived in the past is a disservice to everyone.Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word
October 1 - October 7, 2023davenport.libguides.com
CHANGING HUCK FINN
Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.
In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”
You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
I agree that word should be deleted.
That's stupid. Leave it be. It demonstrates how people behaved in that time period.
Jesus, next they'll be after Rudyard Kipling.
Yes it is a racist book, written in racist times.Let's rewrite Mark Twain. Times have changed and now we know better.
The hubris.
Everyone who's actually read the book will have their opinion taken seriously.
Is The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn a Racist Book?
Let's be careful on this one. I believe direct quotes from the book should be allowed but the mods may disagree.debatepolitics.com
You never read the book.Yes it is a racist book, written in racist times.
It literally is 'changing shit'. Those 'slurs' were common regional vernacular. Everyday people brought up in that time period, in the geographic area used those terms to describe black people. It would be out of character for them not to use them. We have no business sanitizing what Twain actually wrote to appease you or anyone else. If he wanted to use 'slave', then he would have written 'slave' instead of the word he chose. Language and society changes, and specific words gain or lose connotations. Some end up with 'baggage' that gets so heavy we barely use them at all as time goes by. These are concepts that you can teach a middle schooler or high schooler and they are concepts you should teach when you teach literature, or history.Boo ****ing hoo. Literal racial slurs can safely be edited out without changing shit.
Nope.Yes it is a racist book, written in racist times.
Exactly. The story recognizes various racist norms of the time but in no way advocates for racism, and, in fact, presents us with a main character that generally works AGAINST those norms.You never read the book.
Isn't this a free speech issue that so many on here defend? I once tried to read a Dan Bongino book that I thought was going to be about the secret service that soon turned into a book bashing obama. I stopped reading a short way into the book. Why more folks can't do just that, amazes me?Just don't mess with the damned book! It was written in an era where that particular word was widely accepted. If you don't want it on your bookshelf then don't buy it. Same applies to the "gay" books they talk about today.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?