"How to Ban the AR-15"

[Casper]

I figured that is why he ran...

Ran? Sorry I did not know I was your sitter for the evening, my bad.

 

[Casper]

You are confused?

You just can't help yourself, awwwww.

 

[vegas giants]

You just can't help yourself, awwwww.

I can't help unless you let me help. Lol

 

[Casper]

I can't help unless you let me help. Lol

Sorry but I do not work in the mental health industry, but I am sure you can find someone in your local area. Good Luck...

 

[vegas giants]

Sorry but I do not work in the mental health industry, but I am sure you can find someone in your local area. Good Luck...

You dont? I do.

And I'm here to help. Lol

 

[Bodi]

Ran? Sorry I did not know I was your sitter for the evening, my bad.

Ran from the debate at hand... not from posting.

 

[Casper]

Ran from the debate at hand... not from posting.

Nice try, you have an inflated Opinion of your argument.

 

[Bodi]

Nice try, you have an inflated Opinion of your argument.

Not at all. My argument is so simple that I can't believe it when others cant understand it. It is shocking... disheartening... ... scary.

 

[jet57]

How to Ban the AR-15

The lamestream media told you:

Many times over: No one needs an AR-15. All we want to do is ban the AR-15. It’s a weapon of war. It’s a killing machine. It has no place on our streets. The Founders never could have imagined any such thing in the hands of the public. It’s too dangerous for the public to own. The magazine is too large. The bullets can be fired too quickly. It’s scary looking. You don’t need it to hunt ducks. It doesn’t matter if police have them.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Having listed those familiar complaints, I’ll answer them just as fast: Property ownership in this country isn’t based on need (and you don’t get to decide someone else’s need, that’s the communist model). All we want is to have the finest rifle made. It’s a weapon of peace. It’s a self-defense firearm. It’s perfect for the public. The Founders never could have imagined throwing your voice further than you can speak either. It’s too dangerous for the government to be sole owners. Insufficient ammo supply can be lethal. Slow-firing guns are dangerous. Scary is in the eye of the beholder, you might need treatment. Preferences for hunting are personal, immaterial here, not your concern and disconnected from the right to keep and bear arms. Police have them for the exact same reasons we want them. OK, so much for that.



Page Nine: How to Ban the AR-15

Nonsense; every bit of it.

 

[dogboy49]

Nonsense; every bit of it.

Thanks for reading the article I posted. I wouldn't be upset if you showed it to your friends, as well!

With respect to your evaluation, I guess we will both have to wait to see just how many voters think the idea is "nonsense", in the next few voting cycles.

 

[Maccabee]

Many innocent children have died from it too...

What does that have to do with your statement that the CDC studies diseases?

 

[Maccabee]

No it hasn't. Two months out of the last (5,000 months) four hundred years or so it did and this month New York is winning again.

However it does set a unseen precedent. If guns is the main cause of crime and murder in the US, London should never be able to surpass New York.

 

[ataraxia]

How to Ban the AR-15

The lamestream media told you:

Many times over: No one needs an AR-15. All we want to do is ban the AR-15. It’s a weapon of war. It’s a killing machine. It has no place on our streets. The Founders never could have imagined any such thing in the hands of the public. It’s too dangerous for the public to own. The magazine is too large. The bullets can be fired too quickly. It’s scary looking. You don’t need it to hunt ducks. It doesn’t matter if police have them.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Having listed those familiar complaints, I’ll answer them just as fast: Property ownership in this country isn’t based on need (and you don’t get to decide someone else’s need, that’s the communist model). All we want is to have the finest rifle made. It’s a weapon of peace. It’s a self-defense firearm. It’s perfect for the public. The Founders never could have imagined throwing your voice further than you can speak either. It’s too dangerous for the government to be sole owners. Insufficient ammo supply can be lethal. Slow-firing guns are dangerous. Scary is in the eye of the beholder, you might need treatment. Preferences for hunting are personal, immaterial here, not your concern and disconnected from the right to keep and bear arms. Police have them for the exact same reasons we want them. OK, so much for that.



Page Nine: How to Ban the AR-15

If the government really decides to come after you, it's not going to be with the police. You have forgotten about the Branch Davidians.

If you are really worried about the feds coming after you, forget AR15s. Won't do jack. Forget full autos. You are going to need ICBMs and fully armed Apache attack helicopters.

 

[ataraxia]

What does that have to do with your statement that the CDC studies diseases?

They study things which cause death and disease- public health issues.

Guns are the 3rd leading cause of death in American children, right after trauma and cancer. That's a serious public health problem.

 

[Bodi]

What does that have to do with your statement that the CDC studies diseases?

I was pointing out that the CDC studies diseases...

However it does set a unseen precedent. If guns is the main cause of crime and murder in the US, London should never be able to surpass New York.

I never said that guns cause crime...

 

[Rucker61]

They study things which cause death and disease- public health issues.

Guns are the 3rd leading cause of death in American children, right after trauma and cancer. That's a serious public health problem.

We know what causes those deaths. Murders and suicides.

 

[jet57]

Thanks for reading the article I posted. I wouldn't be upset if you showed it to your friends, as well!

With respect to your evaluation, I guess we will both have to wait to see just how many voters think the idea is "nonsense", in the next few voting cycles.

It's the same old regurgitated talking points going by on the merry-go-round again; the whole thing.

Nobody - nobody - needs an AR15 - for any reason whatsoever. THAT is a fact. You want them because they're cool and are transformers and you feel like Rambo when you're shooting one. So that article says nothing and it's all nonsense. It pees on your leg and tells you it's raining.

 

[Rucker61]

It's the same old regurgitated talking points going by on the merry-go-round again; the whole thing.

Nobody - nobody - needs an AR15 - for any reason whatsoever. THAT is a fact. You want them because they're cool and are transformers and you feel like Rambo when you're shooting one. So that article says nothing and it's all nonsense. It pees on your leg and tells you it's raining.

Nobody needs an M1 Carbine for any reason whatsoever. Why do you have one? How do you know how every AR-15 owner feels? Projection?

 

[Tennyson]

It's the same old regurgitated talking points going by on the merry-go-round again; the whole thing.

Nobody - nobody - needs an AR15 - for any reason whatsoever. THAT is a fact. You want them because they're cool and are transformers and you feel like Rambo when you're shooting one. So that article says nothing and it's all nonsense. It pees on your leg and tells you it's raining.

No one needs Democrats for any reason whatsoever.

 

[vegas giants]

No one needs Democrats for any reason whatsoever.

Yes....a one party system. Trump can declare himself emperor of the First Galatic Empire.

 

[dogboy49]

It's the same old regurgitated talking points going by on the merry-go-round again; the whole thing.

Nobody - nobody - needs an AR15 - for any reason whatsoever. THAT is a fact.

I will admit that when anti-gunners continually regurgitate their lame talking points (example: the one you mention here), it does get a bit dizzying.

 

[jet57]

I will admit that when anti-gunners continually regurgitate their lame talking points (example: the one you mention here), it does get a bit dizzying.

Well, since you really don't need and AR15 and you know it, that settles that doesn't it.

 

[Casper]

Well, since you really don't need and AR15 and you know it, that settles that doesn't it.

Sorry but what you think others need is nothing more than your Opinion.

 

[Rucker61]

Well, since you really don't need and AR15 and you know it, that settles that doesn't it.

Settles what? That you don't get to define my needs and wants?

Do you really need an M1 Carbine? Does shooting it make you feel like John Wayne? Shooting my AR-15 in competition makes me feel like I should have practiced more.

 

[dogboy49]

Well, since you really don't need and AR15 and you know it, that settles that doesn't it.

???? I had thought you were against regurgitating your vapid talking points. Now you are showing me that you are in favor of such regurgitation. Sorry for misunderstanding your comment, my bad!