How to ban guns without firing a single shot!

[hecatmoggie]

logbook entry
day 16,980 ....


my 20 gauge shotgun still have never assaulted anybody ... in fact, its never done anything on its own

 

[CLAX1911]

So you don't know how to use the forum's quote function?

Well... you better learn. Because it's not like you've contributed anything worthwhile that one would waste time to go hunting for your old posts.

That's because you're bigoted toward answers you don't agree with.

 

[Rich2018]

For some reason no matter how successful something is overseas it can't ever be replicated in the US.

The same goes for healthcare and prisons.

Yeah but the difference is the British people WANT gun control as they know it makes them safer

American gun owners would rather see the world burn than give up their guns.

 

[CLAX1911]

Yeah but the difference is the British people WANT gun control as they know it makes them safer

American gun owners would rather see the world burn than give up their guns.

The world doesn't burn because people own guns quit being dramatic.

 

[Rich2018]

The world doesn't burn because people own guns quit being dramatic.

I said American gun owners would RATHER see the world burn than give up their guns

Do read.

 

[RF667799]

Yeah but the difference is the British people WANT gun control as they know it makes them safer

They should be pleased they made as their spokesman, an extremist gun banner such as yourself. We don't care what the British want though. Hardly anyone in the rest of the world does either.

American gun owners would rather see the world burn than give up their guns.

Hyperbole.

 

[Feynman Lives!]

"Hunting" Please do keep up the disingenuous denial. Not everyone is as averse to "hunting" as yourself.

I don't care about hunting. I only care about people being killed. If your claim is that we have to choose between saving people and saving hunting.... the loser is obvious. But if there is some way to do both (keep hunting but sill save human lives)... I have no problem

 

[braindrain]

Regardless of its intent, it's inordinately stupid.

But my point is that @Feynman Lives! has taken to lying about things he obviously said. This is an indication he is trolling, perhaps out of bitterness at having his ass handed to him in rational discussion.

It’s been rather comical to watch.
The best part is he is desperately trying to pretend he is the smartest man in the room but yet can’t even keep his arguments straight.
And that is not even getting into the fact that his arguments are some of the dumbest crap I have seen on here in a while.

 

[RF667799]

I don't care about hunting. I only care about people being killed. If your claim is that we have to choose between saving people and saving hunting.... the loser is obvious. But if there is some way to do both (keep hunting but sill save human lives)... I have no problem

You said "hunting". You said it in regard to your hostility to look at the post where I exposed your lie.

And NOW, you want to equivocate and pretend we were talking about hunting game.

Keep going. The entertainment factor alone is great.

 

[Feynman Lives!]

You said "hunting".

Is that a four-letter word?

And NOW, you want to equivocate and pretend we were talking about hunting game.

I don't remember. What was it we were "hunting". Barflies? I just thought you were somehow referring to the topic of the thread for a change.

Please always keep in mind that you're not important enough to waste any of the memory space in the ol' "cranial hard drive" with your crap.

 

[CLAX1911]

Is that a four-letter word?



I don't remember. What was it we were "hunting". Barflies? I just thought you were somehow referring to the topic of the thread for a change.

Please always keep in mind that you're not important enough to waste any of the memory space in the ol' "cranial hard drive" with your crap.

You can't argue.

 

[RF667799]

Is that a four-letter word?



I don't remember. What was it we were "hunting". Barflies? I just thought you were somehow referring to the topic of the thread for a change.

Please always keep in mind that you're not important enough to waste any of the memory space in the ol' "cranial hard drive" with your crap.

Even more amusement. Too bad it's at your expense.

 

[RF667799]

You can't argue.

He can too! Absolutely dreadfully, but still...

Of course, now he has given up and just wants to lie and prevaricate. And talk about me.

 

[CLAX1911]

He can too! Absolutely dreadfully, but still...

Oh he makes no pee flew at the most mid-wittery and then never can defend it.

He doesn't argue he talks about the opponents.

Of course, now he has given up and just wants to lie and prevaricate. And talk about me.

The sad thing is he probably thinks he's saving face.

 

[RF667799]

I don't care about hunting. I only care about people being killed. If your claim is that we have to choose between saving people and saving hunting.... the loser is obvious. But if there is some way to do both (keep hunting but sill save human lives)... I have no problem

I have a way we can keep driving personal vehicles and save human lives. It might illustrate why your "save life at all cost" argument is disingenuous.

Care to hear it?

 

[Feynman Lives!]

I have a way we can keep driving personal vehicles and save human lives. It might illustrate why your "save life at all cost" argument is disingenuous.

Care to hear it?

Nope! Open your own thread. THIS thread is about firearms.

 

[RF667799]

Nope! Open your own thread. THIS thread is about firearms.

This thread is also about your ridiculous idea of saving life at any cost.

Thanks for showing that really doesn't interest you at all.

 

[Feynman Lives!]

This thread is also about your ridiculous idea of saving life at any cost.

Nope! Just about firearms. If you want to argue against saving lives, open your own thread! This thread ASSUMES that saving lives is considered by all posters a good thing.

 

[RF667799]

Nope! Just about firearms. If you want to argue against saving lives, open your own thread! This thread ASSUMES that saving lives is considered by all posters a good thing.

You introduced the idea into the thread, and the thread isn't your property.

If privately owned motor vehicles were limited to speeds of less than 30 mph, and Nascar type safety equipment was required for the vehicle and all occupants, traffic fatalities would be virtually eliminated.

You likely wouldn't support such a policy- though you might lie and say you would. I wouldn't support it myself, and for the same reasons as everyone else. Too inconvenient, chiefly.

 

[Feynman Lives!]

You introduced the idea into the thread, and the thread isn't your property.

I would expect you to change the subject, given you have done so poorly in the matter that IS the subject of this thread.

It's a testament to my point that you decide to change the subject instead of addressing mine. So feel free to knock yourself out, though.

 

[RF667799]

I would expect you to change the subject, given you have done so poorly in the matter that IS the subject of this thread.

It's a testament to my point that you decide to change the subject instead of addressing mine. So feel free to knock yourself out, though.

You introduced the idea of "save lives at any cost".

You're embarrassed to examine the idea that you introduced into the thread.

 

[Rich2018]

I don't care about hunting. I only care about people being killed. If your claim is that we have to choose between saving people and saving hunting.... the loser is obvious. But if there is some way to do both (keep hunting but sill save human lives)... I have no problem

To gun owners, their recreation is more important that human life.

 

[RF667799]

To gun owners, their recreation is more important that human life.

Same as boaters, motorcyclists, people with RVs, people who carve animal figures out of chunks of wood...

The list goes on and on.

 

[CLAX1911]

Nope! Just about firearms.

It isn't really though. It's about attention to ban them for a justification that when offered for something else your logic falls apart.

If you really want to college to learn about this you should demand your money back.

If you want to argue against saving lives,

So banning guns is not about saving lives it's about establishing a dictatorship and taking them.

open your own thread! This thread ASSUMES that saving lives is considered by all posters a good thing.

No it doesn't. It assumes that life is meaningless and not valuable it's predominantly about taking rights away.

 

[Rich2018]

Same as boaters, motorcyclists, people with RVs, people who carve animal figures out of chunks of wood...

The list goes on and on.

Except people who buy boats, RV's etc do so without the intention to kill others.