• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How to ban guns without firing a single shot!

CLAX1911 said:
I didn't argue with your proposal I just declined.
Click to expand...
I know. That's my point. Not a SINGLE poster has arguments to rebut my proposals. You're just the first one to openly admit it.

Even if the rest don't admit it, the absence of a rebuttal is unequivocal evidence that my proposal is even more solid than even I myself thought.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
I know. That's my point. Not a SINGLE poster has arguments to rebut my proposal. You're just the first one to openly admit it.
Click to expand...
It is hard to “rebut” your proposal when it starts out with multiple lies and falsehoods and then you say that pointing out those lies and falsehoods is not an argument that you will accept. Your “proposal” exist in your own little echo chamber and nowhere else.
 
JMB1911A1 said:
It is hard to “rebut” your proposal when it starts out with multiple lies and falsehoods ...
Click to expand...
That's how you rebut it. You point out the "lie" or "falsehood" as it relates to any one of the proposals.

Because even if something I say is "false", but the fact that it's false doesn't invalidate any proposal, then the proposal prevails.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
I know. That's my point.
Click to expand...
Not interested in your proposal thanks.
Feynman Lives! said:
Not a SINGLE poster has arguments to rebut my proposals.
Click to expand...
So? They still decline.
Feynman Lives! said:
You're just the first one to openly admit it.
Click to expand...
Why would anybody argue against your proposal it's rejected what's the point?
Feynman Lives! said:
Even if the rest don't admit it, the absence of a rebuttal is unequivocal evidence that my proposal is even more solid than even I myself thought.
Click to expand...
Well enjoy having a solid rejection. Is that really worth your time?
 
Feynman Lives! said:
That's how you rebut it.
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't anyone need the robot it it's been rejected. The country said no it doesn't matter how accurate your proposal is it's not happening.

We've declined.
Feynman Lives! said:
You point out the "lie" or "falsehood" as it relates to any one of the proposals.
Click to expand...
Your proposals are rejected. Falsehoods or truisms doesn't matter.

If you propose to buy my vehicle and I say no it doesn't matter if you can show that you have the money the answer is no.
Feynman Lives! said:
Because even if something I say is "false", but the fact that it's false doesn't invalidate any proposal, then the proposal prevails.
Click to expand...
The proposal is invalidated by the rejection it was rejected no thanks.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
ALL of them. Not one specific.
Click to expand...

Oh. You're advocating banning all bullets. What about shot?

BTW, my entire post restored from your editing:

So the term you used doesn't describe any specific bullet to be banned, and you admit that.

Your proposal is refuted on those grounds.

Got anything challenging?
 
Feynman Lives! said:
That's how you rebut it. You point out the "lie" or "falsehood" as it relates to any one of the proposals.

Because even if something I say is "false", but the fact that it's false doesn't invalidate any proposal, then the proposal prevails.
Click to expand...

That's a hell of an admission.
 
RF667799 said:
Oh. You're advocating banning all bullets. What about shot?

BTW, my entire post restored from your editing:

So the term you used doesn't describe any specific bullet to be banned, and you admit that.

Your proposal is refuted on those grounds.

Got anything challenging?
Click to expand...
He keeps asking for rebuttal to his proposal in not sure that even means anything. Something that is proposed is either accepted or rejected.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Not interested in your proposal thanks.
Click to expand...

And yet... you're here.... still here... and you keep posting.

Hmmmm. There are many threads I'm not interested in. But I skip them. Curious that you go out of your way to point out over and over that you're not interested in a thread that you just can't stop posting in.


Sounds to me like you're VERY interested... but just can't think of anything of value to post.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
And yet... you're here.... still here... and you keep posting.
Click to expand...
To help people realize that debunking your rejected proposal isn't necessary
Feynman Lives! said:
Hmmmm. There are many threads I'm not interested in. But I skip them.
Click to expand...
I didn't say I wasn't interested. I said I'm not interested in implementing your proposal and I'm also interested in showing other people that there's no point in debunking your proposal because that doesn't matter all you really need to think about is whether it's accepted or rejected.
Feynman Lives! said:
Curious that you go out of your way to point out over and over that you're not interested in a thread that you just can't stop posting in.
Click to expand...
I didn't say I wasn't interested in a thread I said I wasn't interested in your proposal meaning I declined.

I've explained my interest in the thread now twice are you going to read it or are you going to pretend it doesn't exist as usual?
Feynman Lives! said:
Sounds to me like you're VERY interested...
Click to expand...
I've admitted I'm interested in the thread topic yes. But I must decline your proposal. And so has the country too bad so sad.
Feynman Lives! said:
but just can't think of anything of value to post.
Click to expand...
Or what I said nullified you argument and you don't like the fact that humble little me got the better of you.
 
Feynman Lives! said:
Nah! Cop-killer bullets will do....
Click to expand...

So now you contradict your previous post, and we're back to you proposing to ban something that you can't articulate what it is. So again, your proposal is refuted on those grounds.

Feynman Lives! said:
Well... So kind of you to ask. I wouldn't mind a tequila
Click to expand...

No need to further demonstrate you have little knowledge of the subject on which you're asserting all sorts of proposals.
 
JMB1911A1 said:
It is hard to “rebut” your proposal when it starts out with multiple lies and falsehoods and then you say that pointing out those lies and falsehoods is not an argument that you will accept. Your “proposal” exist in your own little echo chamber and nowhere else.
Click to expand...
So you surrender? ;)
peachandgoma-peach.gif
 
Feynman Lives! said:
That's how you rebut it. You point out the "lie" or "falsehood" as it relates to any one of the proposals.

Because even if something I say is "false", but the fact that it's false doesn't invalidate any proposal, then the proposal prevails.
Click to expand...
OMG. You actually think that being false doesn’t invalidate a proposal. That is the height of either arrogance or ignorance. 🤡
 
Feynman Lives! said:
I know. That's my point. Not a SINGLE poster has arguments to rebut my proposals.
Click to expand...
You do understand how silly you look when you lie like this right?
Feynman Lives! said:
You're just the first one to openly admit it.

Even if the rest don't admit it, the absence of a rebuttal is unequivocal evidence that my proposal is even more solid than even I myself thought.
Click to expand...
 
rahl said:
What is a cop killer bullet? Be specific.
Click to expand...
It is when you reveal that your knowledge of firearms is only Hollywood level deep. Specifically Lethal Weapon 3 where pistol bullets go through a bulldozer blade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom