How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right

[Paradoxical]

Dude..no.
First..access to the internet only helps if you use it appropriately.
If you are using ChatGPT? You are not using it appropriately.
You are basically again relying on an " expert" rather than evaluating the evidence for yourself in an objective manner.

You realize that your right wing blogs etc?
Have they presented the research o have shown you? Well why not if according to you..they are non biased.

The way to use the internet is to at least do a search for the research. Read all the peer reviewed research. Then research that is pre print.
Better yet if you have a access to a medical search engine like the Cochrane database.

This you tube..and Chat whatever is not tge way to get unbiased knowledge.

As usual, you are wrong, There is a ChatGPT app that allows you to get up-to-date information and not only to 2021. The material they use is the available material on the topic. I find it is heavily weighted to your side....the liberals.

 

[year2late]

As usual, you are wrong, There is a ChatGPT app that allows you to get up-to-date information and not only to 2021. The material they use is the available material on the topic. I find it is heavily weighted to your side....the liberals.

You are using chatgpt as a source?

 

[jaeger19]

Thanks for the laugh and the confirmation of my long-running posts here about how the far left (you and others) have co-opted the tactics of religion, specifically Christianity, to lure the unsuspecting and malleable minds over to their side with comments such as "you aren't smart enough" and "I can read and understand the research. These sorts of comments just play on the Christian tactics of indoctrination where they claim that nonbelievers are not smart (like they are) because if they were smart, they would believe the "bible' which is just THEIR belief that the Bible is the truth, like you claiming your interpretation of the data is the only one possible and conceivable.

Secondly your comment about"I can read and understand the "research' is the same as a Christian telling a nonbeliever that "I can read and understand the Bible."

Conservatives see right through your tactics.

PS. I didn't see their proof. I didn't see the manner in which they did the testing. I didn't see evidence the prisoners didn't just make crap up like they always do. I didn't see the test results. I didn't see confirmation that they weren't moved from cell to cell. I didn't see how long the prisoners were there. This was just a garbage report put out by people that jumped on the bandwagon of "research' to make a name for themselves ad is one of the crappiest reports ever.

Umm first paradox..your anti vaxx beliefs put you square among the fundamental Christians who believe exactly the same as you.
I think we find it hilarious that you spout the same anti science shtick as Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals..
Then rail against Christianity.

You are tge one that refuses to read scientific kournals much less are capable of understanding them.
Don't get mad at me that you cannot make sound decisions based on the best evidence.

Paradox. I linked to the research study where. IF YOU HAD READ THE RESEARCH

You would have.seen:
The test results.
How infection status was determined and vaccination status was determined
How the prisoners moved around
And how long the prisoners were there.

You refused to read it or you were incapable of understanding it.

 

[jaeger19]

As usual, you are wrong, There is a ChatGPT app that allows you to get up-to-date information and not only to 2021. The material they use is the available material on the topic. I find it is heavily weighted to your side....the liberals.

How exactly does it give you " up to date " information "?
Here is the question..if it's all the material available...then why do you think it's heavily weighted toward liberals.

I tell you that you shouldn't use Chatgpt because of potential bias..
You scream " untrue" then claim that it's biased toward " liberals".

Do you see your intellectual disconnect?

 

[CLAX1911]

We know the vaccine is orders of magnitude safer than trying to contract the disease to gain some sort of "natural immunity."

This is a fact and not a matter of debate.

How do we know that? If it's a fact it'll be easy to prove it not your simping for your overlord is dismissed.

 

[jaeger19]

How do we know that? If it's a fact it'll be easy to prove it not your simping for your overlord is dismissed.

Seriously.?
You can't understand that to great natural immunity you have to risk the consequences of the disease..like death ..
While you don't with vaccination.

 

[CLAX1911]

Seriously.?
You can't understand that to great natural immunity you have to risk the consequences of the disease..like death ..
While you don't with vaccination.

We aren't talking about a real vaccines.

Also it's very unlikely that I would die from a cold I never get a flu vaccine.

 

[jaeger19]

We aren't talking about a real vaccines.

Also it's very unlikely that I would die from a cold I never get a flu vaccine.

What do you mean you aren't talking about a real vaccine?

Second..covid isn't the flu. It's much more virulent than the flu.
By the way. The common cold is not the flu either.

 

[Paradoxical]

You are using chatgpt as a source?

Oh, stop it. Chat GPT has as many links as you tell it to give to you on whatever topic you input and they are current up to today's date and also has a summary.

What do you use? CNN, Snopes> HuffPo?

 

[Paradoxical]

Umm first paradox..your anti vaxx beliefs put you square among the fundamental Christians who believe exactly the same as you.
I think we find it hilarious that you spout the same anti science shtick as Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals..
Then rail against Christianity.

You are tge one that refuses to read scientific kournals much less are capable of understanding them.
Don't get mad at me that you cannot make sound decisions based on the best evidence.

Paradox. I linked to the research study where. IF YOU HAD READ THE RESEARCH

You would have.seen:
The test results.
How infection status was determined and vaccination status was determined
How the prisoners moved around
And how long the prisoners were there.

You refused to read it or you were incapable of understanding it.

You are really quadrupling down on that crap study, aren't you?

 

[Paradoxical]

How exactly does it give you " up to date " information "?
Here is the question..if it's all the material available...then why do you think it's heavily weighted toward liberals.

I tell you that you shouldn't use Chatgpt because of potential bias..
You scream " untrue" then claim that it's biased toward " liberals".

Do you see your intellectual disconnect?

It is heavily biased toward liberals. Do you even know how it works?

 

[CLAX1911]

What do you mean you aren't talking about a real vaccine?

vaccine and name only

Second..covid isn't the flu. It's much more virulent than the flu.
By the way. The common cold is not the flu either.

I never said that it flu was anything but the flu or that covid was anything but covid cold refers to symptoms not the type of virus there's no cold virus there's a rhinovirus there's some other viruses that even coronaviruses that cause colds.

Coronavirus was only really a risk to people who were a frail health or were elderly.

 

[jaeger19]

You are really quadrupling down on that crap study, aren't you?

Nope..its actually just one of many studies that show vaccination reduces transmission.
But..you keep mentioning that it's a " crap study".
But you fail to offer any credible reason for it being " crap".

You mentione..but but the prisoners could mingle.

We that would REDUCE the likelihood of seeing a difference between vaccinated and unvaccibated transmission.
Soooo...

 

[jaeger19]

It is heavily biased toward liberals. Do you even know how it works?

So why do you use it.? You know I stated that you should not use it?

Why are you arguing with me?.
Are you really that clueless?

I mean I tell you not to use it because it can be biased and you keep arguing about it!.
What's your problem? You shouldn't be using that OR any you tube stuff etc.

 

[jaeger19]

vaccine and name only

I never said that it flu was anything but the flu or that covid was anything but covid cold refers to symptoms not the type of virus there's no cold virus there's a rhinovirus there's some other viruses that even coronaviruses that cause colds.

Coronavirus was only really a risk to people who were a frail health or were elderly.

Let's see. In that gobbledygook.
1. Why us it a vaccine in name only. Please be specific in your scientific analysis.
2. You said you couldnt die of a cold and then said you don't get the flu vaccine.
The flu vaccine isn't for colds.
3. J
Not true as covid has killed younger healthier people. Not to mention hospitalized others and caused long covid.
Much more than the flu.

 

[CLAX1911]

Nope..its actually just one of many studies that show vaccination reduces transmission.

then the study is garbage cuz it's false again I can believe My lying eyes or I can believe some manipulative garbage someone produces probably at the best stuff a billion dollar drug company.

But..you keep mentioning that it's a " crap study".
But you fail to offer any credible reason for it being " crap".

suggesting things that were proven false.

If you had a study that claimed the Earth was flat I don't care what scholarly masturbation there was involved in it it's false. I can see it for myself.

You mentione..but but the prisoners could mingle.

We that would REDUCE the likelihood of seeing a difference between vaccinated and unvaccibated transmission.
Soooo...

there isn't a difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated transmission again we have seen that with our own eyes you are insisting that the world is flat and saying I study proves it correct.

And everybody should never trust their lying eyes.

When people say trust the science and list falsehoods as science they're saying obey the authority.

 

[CLAX1911]

Let's see. In that gobbledygook.
1. Why us it a vaccine in name only. Please be specific in your scientific analysis.
2. You said you couldnt die of a cold and then said you don't get the flu vaccine.
The flu vaccine isn't for colds.
3. J
Not true as covid has killed younger healthier people. Not to mention hospitalized others and caused long covid.
Much more than the flu.

1) doesn't vaccinate.
2) you are lying you do this all the time why do you do this all the time and every single argument I get in with you?

I never said I couldn't die from a cold why do you think you can get away with just making shit up.

3) so what. The fact that something has happened doesn't mean it's common.

Why are you so into this fear-mongering what do you get out of it?

 

[jaeger19]

then the study is garbage cuz it's false again I can believe My lying eyes or I can believe some manipulative garbage someone produces probably at the best stuff a billion dollar drug company.
suggesting things that were proven false.

If you had a study that claimed the Earth was flat I don't care what scholarly masturbation there was involved in it it's false. I can see it for myself.
there isn't a difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated transmission again we have seen that with our own eyes you are insisting that the world is flat and saying I study proves it correct.

And everybody should never trust their lying eyes.

When people say trust the science and list falsehoods as science they're saying obey the authority.

So the study is garbage because you " see what" with your own eyes?
Please tell us how you know the vaccination status of everyone in the us and how they did or did not contract covid and who they contracted it from etc..

I mean. Seriously how can you " see with your own eyes,". Can you see the virus?

By the way..you know that the same people that don't believe the science also believe the world is flat..

Using the best scientific evidence is NOT obeying authority.

Refusing to use tge best scientific evidence means you are relying on authority.

 

[jaeger19]

1) doesn't vaccinate.
2) you are lying you do this all the time why do you do this all the time and every single argument I get in with you?

I never said I couldn't die from a cold why do you think you can get away with just making shit up.

3) so what. The fact that something has happened doesn't mean it's common.

Why are you so into this fear-mongering what do you get out of it?

1. Please explain in scientific detail why it " doesn't vaccinate.
2. Um did uou not say you were very unlikely to die from a cold?
"Also it's very unlikely that I would die from a cold".
Which is very true since the common cold has much milder symptoms.
3. Well it means that you are wrong about the risk. Unless you have some crystal ball so you just know it cant be you.
4. It's not fear mongering ..just fact.
What do I get from telling people the truth?

I get tired of treating a holes who scream about how covid is nothing etc etc etc..and refuse to take precautions like vaccination....then end up in the hospital on ventilators..
Or worse they refuse to take precautions and get a family member sick and I have to watch them die needlessly because their son was an a hole anti vaxxer douche.

 

[CLAX1911]

So the study is garbage because you " see what" with your own eyes?

the vaccine not working.

Please tell us how you know the vaccination status of everyone in the us and how they did or did not contract covid and who they contracted it from etc..

I don't assume that everyone who got the virus that claimed to be vaccinated as lying that's a clean that you have to prove show me that all these people that got the virus after they got the vaccine or lying about getting the vaccine if you can't then your argument doesn't stand

I mean. Seriously how can you " see with your own eyes,". Can you see the virus?

how can viruses even exist if I can't see them?

This is saying a lot because of your posting history but that's the most brain that bone-headed thing you have ever posted.

By the way..you know that the same people that don't believe the science also believe the world is flat..

Yeah that's why I compared then to you.

You don't even believe viruses exist because you can't see them.

Using the best scientific evidence is NOT obeying authority.

Precisely why you don't

Refusing to use tge best scientific evidence means you are relying on authority.

yes you are relying on authority.
That's why you are blind to the most basic science.

The Earth isn't flat and viruses exist.

 

[year2late]

Oh, stop it. Chat GPT has as many links as you tell it to give to you on whatever topic you input and they are current up to today's date and also has a summary.

What do you use? CNN, Snopes> HuffPo?

Not sure I trust a site that will write you a story in 1000 words or less about a podiatrist that got his training on the moon by mermaids.

 

[jaeger19]

the vaccine not working.
I don't assume that everyone who got the virus that claimed to be vaccinated as lying that's a clean that you have to prove show me that all these people that got the virus after they got the vaccine or lying about getting the vaccine if you can't then your argument doesn't stand
how can viruses even exist if I can't see them?

This is saying a lot because of your posting history but that's the most brain that bone-headed thing you have ever posted.
Yeah that's why I compared then to you.

You don't even believe viruses exist because you can't see them.
Precisely why you don't
yes you are relying on authority.
That's why you are blind to the most basic science.

The Earth isn't flat and viruses exist.

Umm please provide the vaccine doesn't reduce transmisdion.doesnt reduce chance of infection and doesn't reduce the severity of infection
Now..we I bet you have no studies so you claim. You see it".
So please explain in what capacity you see patients and know their comorbidities..know vaccination status and know what covid infection did to them.
2. Um no. Are you claiming that there is no such thing as a vaccine? Because no vaccine is 100% effective.
You mentioned tge flu vaccine.. yet the flu vaccine has a lower effectiveness than the covid vaccine.
3. Did you really ask..how can a virus exist if you can't see it?
When was the last time you saw oxygen?
Sweet baby jesus.
You are the one saying you can't believe science but instead only your eyes!!!!

( you know folks.there might be something about letting nature cull the stupid).

 

[CLAX1911]

Umm please provide the vaccine doesn't reduce transmisdion.

I don't disprove conspiracy theories if you think the whole world is in a conspiracy against you to convince us all that this fake vaccine is fake then you are stuck in that rut and nobody can help you but you.

I will not provide you with squat that is like casting pearls before swine.

 

[Paradoxical]

Nope..its actually just one of many studies that show vaccination reduces transmission.
But..you keep mentioning that it's a " crap study".
But you fail to offer any credible reason for it being " crap".

You mentione..but but the prisoners could mingle.

We that would REDUCE the likelihood of seeing a difference between vaccinated and unvaccibated transmission.
Soooo...

Already told you. Unless you are dealing with very high numbers and they weren't. chance comes into play. Also, all the other reasons I have mentioned such as prisoners lying or guessing, no proof of what it was they said, and on and on and on. the study was third-grade stuff. More fitting for what AOC would put out.

 

[Paradoxical]

So why do you use it.? You know I stated that you should not use it?

Why are you arguing with me?.
Are you really that clueless?

I mean I tell you not to use it because it can be biased and you keep arguing about it!.
What's your problem? You shouldn't be using that OR any you tube stuff etc.

I use it for many OTHER reasons....not just to debate liberals. I just realize that it is heavily weighted with liberal opinions such as yours.