How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right

[Paradoxical]

Blah blah blah..
Dude you rant about " truth commissions"
And yet you refuse to even read much less critically analyze actual research evidence.
Which means you are COMPLETELY AT THE MERCY OF WHAT PUNDlTS SAY.

You cannot and or refuse to critically analyze objective evidence. And so you are just open to propoganda.
Frankly you are one of the most propogandized persons on this board..

Which is why you are proven so wrong so many times.

So we are in a conversation about vaccines and covid .

You claimed that there was no evidence that the vaccine reduced transmission.
I linked to objective research showing the vaccines do.

You couldn't even analyze it but are reduced to ranting about fbi..doj Cia and whatever!?@?.

The question everyone here wonders is. .what will it take for you to realize you have been duped by your masters?

When someone is so brazen as to slap up a junk science link that talks about prisoners getting Covid when they are in a cell with people who were vaccinated and not vaccinated and doesn't show that all prisoners mingle with each other and therefore there is absolutely no way to know how they got Covid, and then has the cajones to continue o with such junk science as if it is a legitimate report, that poster deserves all the scorn and derision one can throw his way. Get back to me when you have some REAL science

 

[jaeger19]

When someone is so brazen as to slap up a junk science link that talks about prisoners getting Covid when they are in a cell with people who were vaccinated and not vaccinated and doesn't show that all prisoners mingle with each other and therefore there is absolutely no way to know how they got Covid, and then has the cajones to continue o with such junk science as if it is a legitimate report, that poster deserves all the scorn and derision one can throw his way. Get back to me when you have some REAL science

" junk science link"?
Dude you couldn't even analyze it to KNOW if it was " junk science".
I practically begged you to offer an objective and thoughtful critique of the science and you refuse.

For example..why was there a difference seen with transmission in the study. ? You can't even offer a hypothesis..
How would mingling..make a difference?

You are completely at the mercy of your masters telling you what to believe.
And tey have been so so wrong.

Again the question is..what will it take for you to realize you have been duped?

 

[Lursa]

Apples and oranges

Really? Please explain the differences in 'dismissing' those lives. Put up or...?

 

[Paradoxical]

" junk science link"?
Dude you couldn't even analyze it to KNOW if it was " junk science".
I practically begged you to offer an objective and thoughtful critique of the science and you refuse.

For example..why was there a difference seen with transmission in the study. ? You can't even offer a hypothesis..
How would mingling..make a difference?

You are completely at the mercy of your masters telling you what to believe.
And tey have been so so wrong.

Again the question is..what will it take for you to realize you have been duped?

See above bolded

 

[Lursa]

See above bolded

LMAO, see my sig if you want to discussed 'duped.'

 

[jaeger19]

See above bolded

Well yes..you have been duped.

Do you think it's just coincidence that you have been proven wrong again and again?

You are at,a complete loss to explain or critique the research study given...one that completely counters your claim..
Yet again.

At what point do you realize to yourself that the demagogues you have been believing are lying?

 

[Paradoxical]

Well yes..you have been duped.

Do you think it's just coincidence that you have been proven wrong again and again?

You are at,a complete loss to explain or critique the research study given...one that completely counters your claim..
Yet again.

At what point do you realize to yourself that the demagogues you have been believing are lying?

I critiqued it to death. Worthless junk science. Stupid report actually. Science has descended to opinion.

 

[jaeger19]

I critiqued it to death. Worthless junk science. Stupid report actually. Science has descended to opinion.

No you offered zero critique. You vaguely mention something about " mingling". And I asked you explain how mingling would effect the results of the study and how you would explain why the research found a statistical difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated transmission.

You had no answer other than some diatribe about McConnell and the fbi etc.

How many times do you have to be proven wrong before you realize you have been duped by your masters. ???

 

[Paradoxical]

No you offered zero critique. You vaguely mention something about " mingling". And I asked you explain how mingling would effect the results of the study and how you would explain why the research found a statistical difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated transmission.

You had no answer other than some diatribe about McConnell and the fbi etc.

How many times do you have to be proven wrong before you realize you have been duped by your masters. ???

Lol

 

[Moot]

We used to have Dilbert comics on the wallboard and some are real funny

Anyway, in a rare moment of candor the creator of Dilbert Scott Adams had this to say about his fans.
——

Scott Adams is the creator of the famous cartoon strip, Dilbert. It is a strip whose brilliance derives from close observation and understanding of human behavior. Some time ago, Scott turned those skills to commenting insightfully and withI notable intellectual humility on the politics and culture of our country.

Like many other commentators, and based on his own analysis of evidence available to him, he opted to take the Covid “vaccine.”

Recently, however, he posted a video on the topic that has been circulating on social media. It was a mea culpa in which he declared, “The unvaccinated were the winners,” and, to his great credit, “I want to find out how so many of [my viewers] got the right answer about the “vaccine” and I didn’t.”

“Winners” was perhaps a little tongue-in-cheek: he seemingly means that the “unvaccinated” do not have to worry about the long-term consequences of having the “vaccine” in their bodies since enough data concerning the lack of safety of the “vaccines” have now appeared to demonstrate that, on the balance of risks, the choice not to be “vaccinated” has been vindicated for individuals without comorbidities.

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right ⋆ Brownstone Institute

Those of us who got it right or “won” (the unvaccinated) needed only to accept the data of those who were pushing the “vaccination” mandates

brownstone.org

I don't know about that but i do know that most of the people that died from covid weren't vaccinated.

 

[Manc Skipper]

The unvaccinated dying off in far greater numbers than the vaccinated, helped Biden to the Presidency

 

[snakestretcher]

When someone is so brazen as to slap up a junk science link that talks about prisoners getting Covid when they are in a cell with people who were vaccinated and not vaccinated and doesn't show that all prisoners mingle with each other and therefore there is absolutely no way to know how they got Covid, and then has the cajones to continue o with such junk science as if it is a legitimate report, that poster deserves all the scorn and derision one can throw his way. Get back to me when you have some REAL science

What is this "junk science"-and what science credentials do you have which enable you to cast doubt on their accuracy? None; just the predictable trolling and contrariness for the sake of being contrary. It's all you're capable of.

 

[Paradoxical]

What is this "junk science"-and what science credentials do you have which enable you to cast doubt on their accuracy? None; just the predictable trolling and contrariness for the sake of being contrary. It's all you're capable of.

When some people post a "study" that claims prisoners contract Covid when they are in a cell with unvaccinated people more often, those people should be taken by the scruff of the neck with a boot on their ample fannies and tossed out of the building. They are unworthy of anyone further valuable time.

 

[snakestretcher]

When some people post a "study" that claims prisoners contract Covid when they are in a cell with unvaccinated people more often, those people should be taken by the scruff of the neck with a boot on their ample fannies and tossed out of the building. They are unworthy of anyone further valuable time.

Show us your contradicting study. Or should we just take your unqualified offhand dismissal as evidence that it isn't worthy?

 

[Paradoxical]

Show us your contradicting study. Or should we just take your unqualified offhand dismissal as evidence that it isn't worthy?

I need no other studies to debunk idiots who don't realize that even prisoners get to leave their cells for meals and the exercise yard. I guess the dummies forgot about that.

 

[snakestretcher]

I need no other studies to debunk idiots who don't realize that even prisoners get to leave their cells for meals and the exercise yard. I guess the dummies forgot about that.

Yeah, let's rely on @Paradoxical's uneducated opinion. Who needs qualified experts anyway when we have you?

 

[Paradoxical]

Yeah, let's rely on @Paradoxical's uneducated opinion. Who needs qualified experts anyway when we have you?

Prisoners are in cells together. A "study" shows that some people in cells with prisoners who are unvaccinated caught Covid more. THAT was the alleged "study" another poster here slapped up as if that was "science"


Okeeeeeyyy!

 

[jaeger19]

When some people post a "study" that claims prisoners contract Covid when they are in a cell with unvaccinated people more often, those people should be taken by the scruff of the neck with a boot on their ample fannies and tossed out of the building. They are unworthy of anyone further valuable time.

Well please explain in detail why. We would all like to hear your detailed scientific analysis of the research

 

[jaeger19]

Prisoners are in cells together. A "study" shows that some people in cells with prisoners who are unvaccinated caught Covid more. THAT was the alleged "study" another poster here slapped up as if that was "science"


Okeeeeeyyy!

Uh huh and?
What is your alternative hypothesis on why the study found a statistical difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated transmission.

 

[Paradoxical]

Uh huh and?
What is your alternative hypothesis on why the study found a statistical difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated transmission.

I don't need any for such a juvenile report.

res ipsa loquitor

 

[jaeger19]

I don't need any for such a juvenile report.

res ipsa loquitor

So you can't.
Cripes man.. its not like you are even fooling yourself.

Stultis sicut stultis facit.

 

[Paradoxical]

So you can't.
Cripes man.. its not like you are even fooling yourself.

Stultis sicut stultis facit.

You have posted some highly questionable studies before but the one about the prisoners takes the cake.

 

[jaeger19]

You have posted some highly questionable studies before but the one about the prisoners takes the cake.

Yeah. You have zero clue what studies I posted because you have demonstrated that you are unwilling to even try to read them or understand them.
Just like this one.
Clearly you can't understand it.
No one is fooled ..
This is why you are completely at the mercy of your masters.
And how they dupe you so so easily

 

[Paradoxical]

Yeah. You have zero clue what studies I posted because you have demonstrated that you are unwilling to even try to read them or understand them.
Just like this one.
Clearly you can't understand it.
No one is fooled ..
This is why you are completely at the mercy of your masters.
And how they dupe you so so easily

When will you switch parties?

 

[Bodi]

We used to have Dilbert comics on the wallboard and some are real funny

Anyway, in a rare moment of candor the creator of Dilbert Scott Adams had this to say about his fans.
——

Scott Adams is the creator of the famous cartoon strip, Dilbert. It is a strip whose brilliance derives from close observation and understanding of human behavior. Some time ago, Scott turned those skills to commenting insightfully and with notable intellectual humility on the politics and culture of our country.

Like many other commentators, and based on his own analysis of evidence available to him, he opted to take the Covid “vaccine.”

Recently, however, he posted a video on the topic that has been circulating on social media. It was a mea culpa in which he declared, “The unvaccinated were the winners,” and, to his great credit, “I want to find out how so many of [my viewers] got the right answer about the “vaccine” and I didn’t.”

“Winners” was perhaps a little tongue-in-cheek: he seemingly means that the “unvaccinated” do not have to worry about the long-term consequences of having the “vaccine” in their bodies since enough data concerning the lack of safety of the “vaccines” have now appeared to demonstrate that, on the balance of risks, the choice not to be “vaccinated” has been vindicated for individuals without comorbidities.

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right ⋆ Brownstone Institute

Those of us who got it right or “won” (the unvaccinated) needed only to accept the data of those who were pushing the “vaccination” mandates

brownstone.org

How pathetic... LOL