Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
Not kill them is a start.
Law enforcement shouldn't leverage lethal force in any scenario where ANY individual is in a threatening or potentially threatening situation? Should law enforcement WAIT to see if perceived threat is real?
Not kill them is a start.
They don't start off killing them. That happens after an escalation of the situation in which the suspect typically resist arrest, assaults the officer, or tries to flee or all of the above. So some up with a better solution instead of an unfounded claim.
Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
You're going to have a hard time convincing me shooting someone in the back seven times is warranted because of an imminent threat to your life.
Well then .. if you were approaching a hostile criminal, as a law enforcement officer, who attempted to do something with/in his vehicle when you were trying to stop him .. what would your response have been?
Well if you're shooting him in the back, point blank, then you clearly had the option of restraining him from behind.
Law enforcement shouldn't leverage lethal force in any scenario where ANY individual is in a threatening or potentially threatening situation? Should law enforcement WAIT to see if perceived threat is real?
Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
They same way they handle anyone else. Isn't the problem that this is even a question in the first place? Why do you think the skin colour of a suspect should influence how they're handled by the police?Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
Law enforcement shouldn't leverage lethal force in any scenario where ANY individual is in a threatening or potentially threatening situation? Should law enforcement WAIT to see if perceived threat is real?
Yes. Killing someone for a “perceived threat” leads to lots of non threatening dead people.
Cops voluntarily take on the risk associated with being cops. Citizens didn’t accept the risk of being killed because they were a perceived threat.
For the cast majority of interactions they don't.Not kill them is a start.
So law enforcement officers should hesitate and give criminals who choose to be violent or use lethal force an upper hand?
Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
Since dems and BLM always do the victim card, how is COPS gonna handle blacks that do crimes and are criminal not listening to the COPS?
Well then .. if you were approaching a hostile criminal, as a law enforcement officer, who attempted to do something with/in his vehicle when you were trying to stop him .. what would your response have been?
They don't start off killing them. That happens after an escalation of the situation in which the suspect typically resist arrest, assaults the officer, or tries to flee or all of the above. So some up with a better solution instead of an unfounded claim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?