The worse of the predictions are absolutely wrong, yet the some climate scientists still write papers using them. In my view, they lose credibility by doing that. The worse plausible projections still gives us severakl decades to improve the way we do things, and we can a low costs control aerosol emissions. We have dramatically done so in most first world nations, and are still decommissioning or modifying old technology. The concern if the alarmist community would be better focused on getting Asia to play ball, and scrap or modify their existing coal plants, and only build new technology for power.
The entire world population is not at risk from climate change. Maybe a meteor strike...
Please don't misrepresent my position like Deuce, 3Goofs, and other chronically do.
Really?
How do you figure? The costs as their expensive power generation ages, will get even more expensive as maintenance costs rise.
Who's propaganda are you reciting?
I might be wrong, but wasn't Einstein's paper on Special Relativity, written on his kitchen table?
Congratulations on knowing the difference between anthropomorphic and anthropogenic but you should have caught the irony, especially considering the hint.
I think at the the time Einstein only had secondary education, to teach math, and was still working at the patent office.
He received his PhD the same year, but took no classes, it was all his own work.
Considering He took no classes beyond secondary education, and applied for and was granted his PhD,
Einstein's PhD was basically him thinking about how things worked and did not work with his secondary education.
