Obstruction of an investigation by refusing to comply with lawful court orders is a “process crime”. Witness tampering is a “process crime”. Perjury is a “process crime”.
no SCounsel= no process crimes. how many times have we seen this?
Which is a lie he told to try to cover for his unethical behavior in not recusing himself from the house investigation into the Jan 6 investigation.The DOJ took his phone, examined it, and returned it.
As per Perry, the DOJ told him that he was a witness and not a subject of their investigation.
Seizure of Congressman’s Phone Is Latest Sign of Escalating Election Inquiry (Published 2022)
Representative Scott Perry’s lawyer said he was told he is not a target of the Justice Department’s expanding inquiry into one element of the effort to keep Donald J. Trump in power after his loss in 2020.www.nytimes.com
Sure. He's a witness who's refusing to cooperate. His phone may very well have pertinent information on it regarding any number of things related to the overall coup. He also asked for a pardon with the rest.The DOJ took his phone, examined it, and returned it.
As per Perry, the DOJ told him that he was a witness and not a subject of their investigation.
Seizure of Congressman’s Phone Is Latest Sign of Escalating Election Inquiry (Published 2022)
Representative Scott Perry’s lawyer said he was told he is not a target of the Justice Department’s expanding inquiry into one element of the effort to keep Donald J. Trump in power after his loss in 2020.
Or at the very least would expose those of Trump. I think there is a good chance Smith may have a flipper in his sights .
(Meadows)
You can take election denier Perry at his word.The DOJ took his phone, examined it, and returned it.
As per Perry, the DOJ told him that he was a witness and not a subject of their investigation.
Seizure of Congressman’s Phone Is Latest Sign of Escalating Election Inquiry (Published 2022)
Representative Scott Perry’s lawyer said he was told he is not a target of the Justice Department’s expanding inquiry into one element of the effort to keep Donald J. Trump in power after his loss in 2020.
www.politico.com
You’re embarrassing yourself with these ^ stupid lies.
Lie.
You can take election denier Perry at his word.
“On Jan. 5, according to the docket, a three-judge appeals court panel put a temporary hold on Howell’s ruling. The appeals panel assigned to the case — which includes Trump appointees Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas, as well as Karen Henderson, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush — rejected prosecutors’ immediate attempt to access Perry’s documents. Those judges instead set out a schedule for additional legal briefing and a Feb. 23 oral argument at the Prettyman federal courthouse in Washington.
Perry is a crucial figure in the ongoing investigation into Trump’s attempts to overturn his loss to Joe Biden. House and Senate probes have described Perry as an important ally to Trump in the chaotic weeks between the 2020 election and Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of pro-Trump rioters stormed the Capitol in a bid to disrupt the transfer of power.”
Secret hold restricts DOJ's bid to access phone of Trump ally Rep. Scott Perry
The decision by a panel of federal appellate judges temporarily blocks a lower-court ruling, escalating the battle over communications related to DOJ's probe of 2020 election challenges.
Attempting to invoke our Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause didn’t work for Graham, when his actions in GA were clearly outside of his duties as SC’s senior Senator, and it isn’t going to protect Perry either.
No it's not. Is intent, knowledge and intent. What statute are you quoting?
I just hope you are right. Nevertheless, it is soothing, in kind of a perverse way, to read your opinion.
So what? Jeffries added support is irrelevant to the actual issue of Perry’s involvement in Traitor Trump’s attempted coup.
Yes that is the one that the search warrant was obtained on in Trumps case where the subject matter of the documents matters more than there classification but there is no reason to believe it applies to Biden. We have no information that his documents related to national defense. It much more like the statute 18 1924 which refers to removal of classified documents that requires knowledge and intent not gross negligence.
.....and other than deflection... your point would be ?
Already understood.
The speciousness is in the argument that Perry, Graham, and/or other members of Congress are entitled to speak/involve themselves in (potentially illegal) matters very clearly outside the scope of the Speech and Debate clause.
Arguing against allowing DOJ to access Perry’s phone isn’t the potential crime I was referring to.
If Trump is charged with anything re: 1/6, and I'm not positive that he will be, it very likely may not include incitement.The allegations of incitement -- which is what we usually hear Trump supposedly did-- is all about holding somebody liable for causing somebody else to do what that person did.