- Joined
- Apr 17, 2018
- Messages
- 21,321
- Reaction score
- 10,532
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
18 USC 1924 deals with classified information and primarily officers of the US. 793 deals with information related to national defense and imposes penalties for allowing, through “gross negligence,” the removal of information relating to the national defense from its proper place of custody. What Comey testified about to Congress about 793 was the DOJ historically having concerns about the constitutionality of 793 as being one of the reasons it has only been prosecuted once in the prior half century.Respectfully, you are off, here.
The two statutes that criminalize the mishandling of classified information are 18 U.S. Code § 1924 and 18 U.S. Code § 793, which together form key parts of the Espionage Act. The first, § 1924, makes it a misdemeanor for any person entrusted with classified information to intentionally remove that information from its proper place of storage. The second, § 793, makes it a felony for any person entrusted with classified information to remove the information from its proper place of storage with the intent to harm the national interests of the United States. As Comey made clear during his congressional testimony, the investigation’s main focus was on this latter statute.
And it was wrong again.Answered immediately above.
Two sides of the same coin? I think so too. One could say that all this story with the left getting Trump is just a way to avoid delivering what the people on the left really want, like universal healthcare, free higher education, etc. Whatever happened to the big ideas of the left? Forgotten. The people on the left are so easily distracted by this pettiness that they forget all about why they support the left in the first place. What will be totally hilarious is that when Trump skates, all the left will have accomplished with their majority is their failure to get Trump and nothing else. What will the voters on the left do then? Same as it ever was, vote blue no matter who and repeat the cycle of political theatrics.So many people wanting Trump arrested for various reasons, apparently most are not considering how they all protect each other, so as to not put themselves at jeopardy, this goes doubly for sitting Presidents. Think what you want, but regardless of their party affiliation this holds true, feel free to wait and see.
It’s the other way around, this shows Garland was way too dangerous to allow on the court.I bet Mitch is kicking himself for not letting Garland on the Supreme Court right now
What Has Merrick Garland done that in any manner remotely qualifies as "too dangerous"?It’s the other way around, this shows Garland was way too dangerous to allow on the court.
Acting in a banana republic manner as attorney general, his record has consistently been criminalizing opposition to the Biden regimeWhat Has Merrick Garland done that in any manner remotely qualifies as "too dangerous"?
What did Garland do that was "Acting in a banana republic manner"? Please provide any/all examples of Garland "consistently criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime" with valid, credible links. Your hearsay positive claim doesn't meet acceptable burden of proof by any honest debater's standards.Acting in a banana republic manner as attorney general, his record has consistently been criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime
Attempting to take down the leader of Biden’s oppositionWhat did Garland do that was "Acting in a banana republic manner"?
So the fact that Garland was too late to the party and Trump has already sold or given the TS/SCI nuclear program documents to the Russians bothers you? Why?Acting in a banana republic manner as attorney general, his record has consistently been criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime
Define "take down" in your your own words, and then present the dictionary definition, so we can see if your definition aligns with the 'actual' definition.Attempting to take down the leader of Biden’s opposition
You mean the traitor that stole and sold our nuclear secrets to the Russians? That is not the opposition, that is our enemy and he will be spending the rest of his life in jail if he is lucky.Attempting to take down the leader of Biden’s opposition
Trump's 4 year average approval was 41%. The lowest since Gallup started polling.Never is at 50%.
I am surprised that people are silly enough to think otherwise.
Blah blah blah blah.You mean the traitor that stole and sold our nuclear secrets to the Russians? That is not the opposition, that is our enemy and he will be spending the rest of his life in jail if he is lucky.
And Biden is going to end his term even lower. Trump is probably more popular than Biden at this point.Trump's 4 year average approval was 41%. The lowest since Gallup started polling.
"At this point", in light of current events at Mar-a-Largo and in a court of law in NYC this past week, in which Trump took the 5th over 400 times after declaring only the guilty plead the 5th, while being deposed,, I'm betting Trump is wishing his popularity was at an all time low, and he was flying as low under the radar as possible.And Biden is going to end his term even lower. Trump is probably more popular than Biden at this point.
Yes, I know that you are a leftist and are desperately clinging for any reason to justify your Trump hatred."At this point", in light of current events at Mar-a-Largo and in a court of law in NYC this past week, in which Trump took the 5th over 400 times, while being deposed,, I'm betting Trump is wishing his popularity was at an all time low, and he was flying as low under the radar as possible.
"Man, you really sound angry." --- lol ---Yes, I know that you are a leftist and are desperately clinging for any reason to justify your Trump hatred.
The law and its punishment changed in 2018I pointed out the section of law that Hilary violated. You don't like that I was right, and so you are pretending that an entirely different section is somehow controlling. That's a bizarre defense, and one you would (rightly) reject in a hot second if Trump tried it.
Trump is not subject to that law. He was president. Hillary was merely a lowly secretary.The law and its punishment changed in 2018
Going after someone for violation of the Espionage act isn't pettinessTwo sides of the same coin? I think so too. One could say that all this story with the left getting Trump is just a way to avoid delivering what the people on the left really want, like universal healthcare, free higher education, etc. Whatever happened to the big ideas of the left? Forgotten. The people on the left are so easily distracted by this pettiness that they forget all about why they support the left in the first place. What will be totally hilarious is that when Trump skates, all the left will have accomplished with their majority is their failure to get Trump and nothing else. What will the voters on the left do then? Same as it ever was, vote blue no matter who and repeat the cycle of political theatrics.
I'm thinking he's being sarcasticWhat Has Merrick Garland done that in any manner remotely qualifies as "too dangerous"?
Well it certainly isn’t petty in the sense that they are trying to stifle and imprisoned political opposition.Going after someone for violation of the Espionage act isn't pettiness
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?