• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long before Trump is arrested?

How long before Trump is arrested


  • Total voters
    90
Respectfully, you are off, here.

The two statutes that criminalize the mishandling of classified information are 18 U.S. Code § 1924 and 18 U.S. Code § 793, which together form key parts of the Espionage Act. The first, § 1924, makes it a misdemeanor for any person entrusted with classified information to intentionally remove that information from its proper place of storage. The second, § 793, makes it a felony for any person entrusted with classified information to remove the information from its proper place of storage with the intent to harm the national interests of the United States. As Comey made clear during his congressional testimony, the investigation’s main focus was on this latter statute.​
18 USC 1924 deals with classified information and primarily officers of the US. 793 deals with information related to national defense and imposes penalties for allowing, through “gross negligence,” the removal of information relating to the national defense from its proper place of custody. What Comey testified about to Congress about 793 was the DOJ historically having concerns about the constitutionality of 793 as being one of the reasons it has only been prosecuted once in the prior half century.
 
Last edited:
Trump is a lifetime liar with no morals.
 
So many people wanting Trump arrested for various reasons, apparently most are not considering how they all protect each other, so as to not put themselves at jeopardy, this goes doubly for sitting Presidents. Think what you want, but regardless of their party affiliation this holds true, feel free to wait and see.
 
So many people wanting Trump arrested for various reasons, apparently most are not considering how they all protect each other, so as to not put themselves at jeopardy, this goes doubly for sitting Presidents. Think what you want, but regardless of their party affiliation this holds true, feel free to wait and see.
Two sides of the same coin? I think so too. One could say that all this story with the left getting Trump is just a way to avoid delivering what the people on the left really want, like universal healthcare, free higher education, etc. Whatever happened to the big ideas of the left? Forgotten. The people on the left are so easily distracted by this pettiness that they forget all about why they support the left in the first place. What will be totally hilarious is that when Trump skates, all the left will have accomplished with their majority is their failure to get Trump and nothing else. What will the voters on the left do then? Same as it ever was, vote blue no matter who and repeat the cycle of political theatrics.
 
I bet Mitch is kicking himself for not letting Garland on the Supreme Court right now
It’s the other way around, this shows Garland was way too dangerous to allow on the court.
 
What Has Merrick Garland done that in any manner remotely qualifies as "too dangerous"?
Acting in a banana republic manner as attorney general, his record has consistently been criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime
 
Acting in a banana republic manner as attorney general, his record has consistently been criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime
What did Garland do that was "Acting in a banana republic manner"? Please provide any/all examples of Garland "consistently criminalizing opposition to the Biden regime" with valid, credible links. Your hearsay positive claim doesn't meet acceptable burden of proof by any honest debater's standards.
 
Never is at 50%.

I am surprised that people are silly enough to think otherwise.
 
Attempting to take down the leader of Biden’s opposition
You mean the traitor that stole and sold our nuclear secrets to the Russians? That is not the opposition, that is our enemy and he will be spending the rest of his life in jail if he is lucky.
 
You mean the traitor that stole and sold our nuclear secrets to the Russians? That is not the opposition, that is our enemy and he will be spending the rest of his life in jail if he is lucky.
Blah blah blah blah.
 
Trump's 4 year average approval was 41%. The lowest since Gallup started polling.
And Biden is going to end his term even lower. Trump is probably more popular than Biden at this point.
 
And Biden is going to end his term even lower. Trump is probably more popular than Biden at this point.
"At this point", in light of current events at Mar-a-Largo and in a court of law in NYC this past week, in which Trump took the 5th over 400 times after declaring only the guilty plead the 5th, while being deposed,, I'm betting Trump is wishing his popularity was at an all time low, and he was flying as low under the radar as possible. :ROFLMAO:
 
"At this point", in light of current events at Mar-a-Largo and in a court of law in NYC this past week, in which Trump took the 5th over 400 times, while being deposed,, I'm betting Trump is wishing his popularity was at an all time low, and he was flying as low under the radar as possible. :ROFLMAO:
Yes, I know that you are a leftist and are desperately clinging for any reason to justify your Trump hatred.
 
I pointed out the section of law that Hilary violated. You don't like that I was right, and so you are pretending that an entirely different section is somehow controlling. That's a bizarre defense, and one you would (rightly) reject in a hot second if Trump tried it.
The law and its punishment changed in 2018
 
The law and its punishment changed in 2018
Trump is not subject to that law. He was president. Hillary was merely a lowly secretary.
 
Two sides of the same coin? I think so too. One could say that all this story with the left getting Trump is just a way to avoid delivering what the people on the left really want, like universal healthcare, free higher education, etc. Whatever happened to the big ideas of the left? Forgotten. The people on the left are so easily distracted by this pettiness that they forget all about why they support the left in the first place. What will be totally hilarious is that when Trump skates, all the left will have accomplished with their majority is their failure to get Trump and nothing else. What will the voters on the left do then? Same as it ever was, vote blue no matter who and repeat the cycle of political theatrics.
Going after someone for violation of the Espionage act isn't pettiness
 
Going after someone for violation of the Espionage act isn't pettiness
Well it certainly isn’t petty in the sense that they are trying to stifle and imprisoned political opposition.

The pettiness is in the naked absurdity of the charge. This is basically a nicer way of saying anti-Soviet behavior. This is a show trial
 
Back
Top Bottom