That's no better (or correct) than the sadly common pro-life argument that people who are pro-choice aren't really pro-choice, they are pro-infanticide. It assumes that others secretly agree with you, and indicates a distinct lack of empathy and understanding.
Agreed. Let's include men's responsibility in here somewhere, though, too.
I hope so. My worry is: Seems like the GOP continuously tries to put/keep women in a UDB (Unfair Disadvantage Box) year after year, law after law. I ponder what great Scientists, Leaders, medical break-throughs and many other actions that ALL of us have lost because we're only using about 1/2 of the population to make this a better world.
Absolutely. But, would that also include a voice in the decision?
IDK. Reading through their web site it seems that they are concerned with a lot of other issues as well.
Sure, if he agrees to raise the child.
Some societies do. Others do not
Yeah. They like to obfuscate that.
In just a casual look at the site there appears to be a lot of information available not pertaining to abortion. Education is a good thing, yes?
I wonder how many women choose to have an abortion because the man doesn’t want the responsibility. I agree that trying to avoid responsibility isn’t a good reason for abortion.
That's a very plausible future. That would force both parties closer to the middle, and would create serious wedge problems, however, so, both might see advantage in not leading that charge.
Obviously the United States offers a lot of opportunities. Otherwise you wouldn’t have so many foreigners wanting to come here.
www.latimes.com
Uh huh. That’s nice
Yes. Contraption is the best way to prevent abortions. It will be next on the chopping block.The contraceptive coverage mandate helped drive down the abortion rate. “Pro-life” partisans have been trying to repeal it for over a decade.
Abortion rate declines to historic low, with Obamacare a likely contributor, study says
The U.S. abortion rate has hit its lowest point since the procedure became legal nationwide in 1973, according to a new study.
The issue might be about taxpayers paying for choice. It does present a conundrum though in that if we don’t pay for contraception then we may end up paying for the care of the children born. But forcing payment is problematic.The contraceptive coverage mandate helped drive down the abortion rate. “Pro-life” partisans have been trying to repeal it for over a decade.
Abortion rate declines to historic low, with Obamacare a likely contributor, study says
The U.S. abortion rate has hit its lowest point since the procedure became legal nationwide in 1973, according to a new study.
I hope so. My worry is: Seems like the GOP continuously tries to put/keep women in a UDB (Unfair Disadvantage Box) year after year, law after law. I ponder what great Scientists, Leaders, medical break-throughs and many other actions that ALL of us have lost because we're only using about 1/2 of the population to make this a better world.
True, some women have been able to climb out of the proverbial box and do some real good for this earth but I'm sure, as you know, it ain't enough.
I see your point about education except that it seems your version of it seems to be more indoctrination, which typically only offers one choice.
Given that it will be kicked back to the States, I suppose a direct comparison would depends on when. Pre Fugitive Slave Act, when non-slave states were free to allow escaped slaves to seek freedom, yeah, I suppose.
I always get a kick out of so-called progressives speaking against regression when practically everything they stand for is regressive in nature. lol
It's a historically very common form of education :-/