Yeah, you said "mandates," not "every single government action relating to COVID."
Anyway. Blaming the "shut downs" for economic issues is absurd. People were self-distancing before any official shutdowns happened; and if we hadn't shut down, then the death rate would have been double or triple, a condition that would have forced shutdowns eventually.
This is another example of conflating the impact of the pandemic with the "mandates."
The pandemic slammed hospitals, meaning they had no choice but to postpone elective procedures. If state governments hadn't forced them to do so, then it would have happened anyway.
I'd add that except in the worst cases, people were able to get critical medical care when they needed it. Most people postponed medical procedures not because of government orders, but because they were terrified they would catch COVID at the hospital or doctor's office.
Locking down assisted living and nursing facilities was an impact of the
disease, not government mandates. Most facilities kept family out long before there were any government mandates. That wasn't unusual -- before the pandemic, most facilities would lock down if a resident got the flu, and certainly wouldn't want you visiting if you were sick. If they hadn't locked down, the death toll would have been far worse.
I'd add that if someone is afflicted badly enough by dementia to forget that there's a pandemic, then they aren't going to be "confused" because you didn't visit. Someone that far gone won't usually remember that you visited in the first place.