• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How do the Zionist terrorism supporters explain this about Hamas?

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
59,809
Reaction score
30,527
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
They've called Hamas every word they can think of - sort of like how MAGA calls Democratic opponents 'Commie Fascist Pedophile' and so on - including "terrorists", "Nazis", ISIL", and more.

How do they explain Hamas' policy of not shooting at military medical evacuations?

The IOF/IDF is committing any type of crime they can including attacking hospitals - including in the last day - yet Hamas is not attacking their medical evacuations as a policy.

How do we know? Well, we have many videos they post showing the evacuations, showing them there where they could shoot and not doing so, and in all the IOF/IDF casualty reports, there are none of medical evacuations being attacked.

The Zionists terrorism supporters might try to guess 'it's for propaganda'. How much propaganda value are they getting? What benefit? Has the press coverage covered the policy? No, that's no explanation. So what is? Perhaps it's time for, "Hamas, the most moral military in the world".
 
They've called Hamas every word they can think of - sort of like how MAGA calls Democratic opponents 'Commie Fascist Pedophile' and so on - including "terrorists", "Nazis", ISIL", and more.

How do they explain Hamas' policy of not shooting at military medical evacuations?

The IOF/IDF is committing any type of crime they can including attacking hospitals - including in the last day - yet Hamas is not attacking their medical evacuations as a policy.

How do we know? Well, we have many videos they post showing the evacuations, showing them there where they could shoot and not doing so, and in all the IOF/IDF casualty reports, there are none of medical evacuations being attacked.

The Zionists terrorism supporters might try to guess 'it's for propaganda'. How much propaganda value are they getting? What benefit? Has the press coverage covered the policy? No, that's no explanation. So what is? Perhaps it's time for, "Hamas, the most moral military in the world".


Not only don't we see Hamas and co attacking the Israeli medics, as the Israeli terrorists destroy the entire health system in Gaza, we also see the Israeli state terrorists targeting the Palestinian medics AND any members of the public who try to help stricken/injured/dying Palestinians in the streets of Gaza.

For me it's definitely more of a case for " the IDF, the most immoral army in the world"
 
If Hitler was a bad guy, how do you explain his love for pets?

What does that have to do with the subject matter of this thread?

Was it just easier to not address the actual factual events contained within the OP?

Your question is bizarre imo because the answer is so easy, seldom is a person evil in every aspect of their being.

So nothing to say on how the side we support in the " civilized" West routinely murders medics/first responders and the alleged Barbarian horde doesn't?

Does that not sound like a world turned upside down to you?
 
What does that have to do with the subject matter of this thread?
It's to make a point: why quibble over something like this in the first place?
Was it just easier to not address the actual factual events contained within the OP?
How many people would seriously address my question if I made a thread out of it to try and argue that Hitler = good and Britain/America = bad? There's a reason why this isn't exactly a hot topic 7 hours after being posted.
Your question is bizarre imo because the answer is so easy, seldom is a person evil in every aspect of their being.
Sure, but who cares? Would it really change any reasonable person's general opinion of Hitler?
So nothing to say on how the side we support in the " civilized" West routinely murders medics/first responders and the alleged Barbarian horde doesn't?
First of all, why is this such an important matter to you? Are first responders some kind of sacred cow to you?

Secondly, who says it doesn't?
1730611319472.webp
Does that not sound like a world turned upside down to you?
Not at all.
 
They've called Hamas every word they can think of - sort of like how MAGA calls Democratic opponents 'Commie Fascist Pedophile' and so on - including "terrorists", "Nazis", ISIL", and more.

How do they explain Hamas' policy of not shooting at military medical evacuations?

The IOF/IDF is committing any type of crime they can including attacking hospitals - including in the last day - yet Hamas is not attacking their medical evacuations as a policy.

How do we know? Well, we have many videos they post showing the evacuations, showing them there where they could shoot and not doing so, and in all the IOF/IDF casualty reports, there are none of medical evacuations being attacked.

The Zionists terrorism supporters might try to guess 'it's for propaganda'. How much propaganda value are they getting? What benefit? Has the press coverage covered the policy? No, that's no explanation. So what is? Perhaps it's time for, "Hamas, the most moral military in the world".

Hamas, the most moral military in the world?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
It's to make a point: why quibble over something like this in the first place?

Nah, it's an attempt to divert and you know it.
How many people would seriously address my question if I made a thread out of it to try and argue that Hitler = good and Britain/America = bad? There's a reason why this isn't exactly a hot topic 7 hours after being posted.

Sure, but who cares? Would it really change any reasonable person's general opinion of Hitler?

People who like to know the truth " care", that likely doesn't include you
First of all, why is this such an important matter to you? Are first responders some kind of sacred cow to you?

Because when one side is being demonized for its actions and the other lionized for doing much worse we have an issue surrounding truth and perception.


Secondly, who says it doesn't?
View attachment 67541108

Not at all.


I found that story because you never actually provided a link to follow and what you left out is instructive.

They were both soldiers ( legitimate targets, note not a terror attack) that were killed during an intense firefight between the IDF troops and Hamas fighters.

IDf troops in a number of vehicles arrived on the scene and a gunbattle with the attackers broke out. At the same time, Sergeant Victor Ariel, a medic, left his vehicle and approached Batito's body. Ariel was killed by a grenade thrown by one of the attackers.


You see, I give links so people can look for themselves , you apparently less so and for obvious reasons.
 
Nah, it's an attempt to divert and you know it.


People who like to know the truth " care", that likely doesn't include you


Because when one side is being demonized for its actions and the other lionized for doing much worse we have an issue surrounding truth and perception.
It's the "trivia" section of truth. I care about it as much as I care about Hitler's favorite brand of underwear.
I found that story because you never actually provided a link to follow and what you left out is instructive.

They were both soldiers ( legitimate targets, note not a terror attack) that were killed during an intense firefight between the IDF troops and Hamas fighters.
The point is the OP's premise is bunkum.

You see, I give links so people can look for themselves , you apparently less so and for obvious reasons.
It's a screenshot for ****'s safe, what's not lookable about it? :rolleyes:

...and the source is also in the picture.
 
The point is the OP's premise is bunkum.


That's not what the available evidence indicates,.

You should be honest imo and just admit you just don't like the thought of it being true.
 
The available evidence indicates Hamas killed at least one medic.


You are going back 20 years to a killing of a medic in a gunfight and IGNORING the masses of medics Israel is slaughtering in Gaza and Lebanon now.

So it's not a problem with the evidence, it's a problem with you deep seated biases
 
You are going back 20 years to a killing of a medic in a gunfight and IGNORING the masses of medics Israel is slaughtering in Gaza and Lebanon now.
I'm not ignoring anything. Medics aren't my sacred cow, they appear to be that of folks like you, and almost certainly for rhetorical gain.
So it's not a problem with the evidence, it's a problem with you deep seated biases
Oct 7 proved Hamas is gonna kill innocent civilians, whether they're also medics or not (I mean do you honestly want me to believe they made inquiries regarding each hostage they took or killed to figure out if they're medics or not? 🤣 ). If they're not killing as many medics as would satisfy you, it's because they can't because they suck.
 
I'm not ignoring anything. Medics aren't my sacred cow, they appear to be that of folks like you, and almost certainly for rhetorical gain.

Of course you are ignoring the fact that Israel is routinely and deliberately murdering medics ( and a whole host of other people) in a bid to paint your own preferred tribe as somehow a few steps up on the ladder of morality from their opponents.
Oct 7 proved Hamas is gonna kill innocent civilians, whether they're also medics or not (I mean do you honestly want me to believe they made inquiries regarding each hostage they took or killed to figure out if they're medics or not? 🤣 ). If they're not killing as many medics as would satisfy you, it's because they can't because they suck.

You cherry pick what crimes you support and what you don't based on personal bias towards the tribe AND you expect to be taken seriously for it ?:rolleyes:

Deliberately killing marked medics is a war crime and here you are playing it down, only in the next breathe to be frothing over the murder of Israeli civilians on 7th October?

You evidently haven't seen the footage or the reports coming out of Gaza acknowledging that Hamas are not firing on medics from the Israeli side OR you have and you just don't want to accept it because it rubbishes your preferred worldview.

Either of which show just where your positions come from and why they are pretty much useless reading for people interested in unerstanding this conflict
 
Of course you are ignoring the fact that Israel is routinely and deliberately murdering medics ( and a whole host of other people) in a bid to paint your own preferred tribe as somehow a few steps up on the ladder of morality from their opponents.
Medics in a war zone are gonna get killed. What's the big deal? Tell your Hamas buddies not to start a war maybe.
You cherry pick what crimes you support and what you don't based on personal bias towards the tribe AND you expect to be taken seriously for it ?:rolleyes:

Deliberately killing marked medics is a war crime and here you are playing it down, only in the next breathe to be frothing over the murder of Israeli civilians on 7th October?
Who said it was deliberate? Post the instance and we'll see. Post the law you think was broken as well.
You evidently haven't seen the footage or the reports coming out of Gaza acknowledging that Hamas are not firing on medics from the Israeli side OR you have and you just don't want to accept it because it rubbishes your preferred worldview.

Either of which show just where your positions come from and why they are pretty much useless reading for people interested in unerstanding this conflict
 
Medics in a war zone are gonna get killed. What's the big deal? Tell your Hamas buddies not to start a war maybe.

The big deal is if they are marked medics being deliberately killed it's a war crime.

So when you start on about Israeli civilians killed in war crimes but dismiss the above because the victims are Palestinian civilians or Lebanese civilians you are just showing the same bigoted views you will find on any stormfront thread

Who said it was deliberate? Post the instance and we'll see. Post the law you think was broken as well.
You can believe it's a crime or not but you aren't getting me to do work for you lol

I've learned one thing, an important thing to do with those of the bigoted positions, what was never reasoned in will never be reasoned out.

You are lost, completely , to your own bigoted views and prefer life that way, obviously.
 
The big deal is if they are marked medics being deliberately killed it's a war crime.

So when you start on about Israeli civilians killed in war crimes but dismiss the above because the victims are Palestinian civilians or Lebanese civilians you are just showing the same bigoted views you will find on any stormfront thread


You can believe it's a crime or not but you aren't getting me to do work for you lol
So as expected when asked to put up or shut up, you shift the burden of proof.
I've learned one thing, an important thing to do with those of the bigoted positions, what was never reasoned in will never be reasoned out.

You are lost, completely , to your own bigoted views and prefer life that way, obviously.
 
So as expected when asked to put up or shut up, you shift the burden of proof.

You confuse my valuing of my own time with taking your bigoted tripe posts seriously :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
You confuse my valuing of my own time with taking your bigoted tripe posts seriously :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
You've posted over 25,000 messages on this forum over 10+ years. It's obvious you're spending a LOT of time on your posting here, so I don't buy the "valuing of my own time" nonsense. It's a problem of a lack of substance, not a lack of time for you.
 
You've posted over 25,000 messages on this forum over 10+ years. It's obvious you're spending a LOT of time on your posting here, so I don't buy the "valuing of my own time" nonsense. It's a problem of a lack of substance, not a lack of time for you.

Again you mistake my willingness to invest that time on posters such as yourself.

If you were presenting decent arguments that could fool people here I would be prepared to give some decent amount of time into debunking them.

But all you are presenting is obviously ill thought out /ignorant/hopelessly biased tripe postings.

No one with a brain is going to ever consider them worthy of being read imo
 
Again you mistake my willingness to invest that time on posters such as yourself.

If you were presenting decent arguments that could fool people here I would be prepared to give some decent amount of time into debunking them.

But all you are presenting is obviously ill thought out /ignorant/hopelessly biased tripe postings.

No one with a brain is going to ever consider them worthy of being read imo

Interesting.... Plenty of time to type but no time to present citation.
 
Interesting.... Plenty of time to type but no time to present citation.

LIkewise.........

But all you are presenting is obviously ill thought out /ignorant/hopelessly biased tripe postings.

No one with a brain is going to ever consider them worthy of being read imo
 
Back
Top Bottom