How Bad It Is For Trump

[digitusmedius]

I know, right? Whats to complain about?

Falsely accusing a president of being a planted Russian agent
Falsely accusing a SC Justice of being an alcoholic high school rape train conductor
Having temper tantrums while blocking traffic
Attacking Conservatives in Restaurants
Burning businesses
Terrorizing the families of reporters in their homes
Running around in masked garb so you can pick off some unsuspecting individual
Rioting at college campuses to stop free speech

Then you come on here like some little hurt lamb a cry. Left Liberals are nothing more than whining little hypocritical bitches. If your feewings are getting hurt might I suggest finding a forum where you can find a puppy to pet or a coloring book to color in.

That's quite a litany of manufactured grievances. But I am a bit surprised by the first one. This is the first I've heard the ****bag was actually a Russian plant. He certainly is Putin's butt-boy but now you're telling us he was actually the Muscovian Candidate?

 

[Iron_Merc]

That's quite a litany of manufactured grievances. But I am a bit surprised by the first one. This is the first I've heard the ****bag was actually a Russian plant. He certainly is Putin's butt-boy but now you're telling us he was actually the Muscovian Candidate?

 

[digitusmedius]

You just can't get used to the fact that someone you call buffoon is a successful President.

Au contraire. I relish comments like that from buffoons who actually think something as ridiculous as that and then put it up in writing for all to see what buffoons they are. Merci beaucoup.

 

[digitusmedius]

View attachment 67263893

Have another glass of the Kool-Aid and give us a few more laughs.

 

[Condor060]

That's quite a litany of manufactured grievances. But I am a bit surprised by the first one. This is the first I've heard the ****bag was actually a Russian plant. He certainly is Putin's butt-boy but now you're telling us he was actually the Muscovian Candidate?

A Litany of Manufactured grievances? Prove one wrong or get caught up on current events.

Falsely accusing a president of being a planted Russian agent
Falsely accusing a SC Justice of being an alcoholic high school rape train conductor
Having temper tantrums while blocking traffic
Attacking Conservatives in Restaurants
Burning businesses
Terrorizing the families of reporters in their homes
Running around in masked garb so you can pick off some unsuspecting individual
Rioting at college campuses to stop free speech

 

[Condor060]

I really do appreciate that Trumphumpers have no shame in defending that lying, narcissistic, rage-baby. It's why I post things like this just to see how far they're will to humiliate themselves. So far, there seems to be no limit to how far they'll go.

Thanks for making my point.

 

[Iron_Merc]

Have another glass of the Kool-Aid and give us a few more laughs.

You asked for it. LOL

 

[digitusmedius]

Thanks for making my point.

You have officially reached the bottom of the desperation barrel. Or, have you? Let's see what else you got.

 

[digitusmedius]

You asked for it. LOL

View attachment 67263899

Not only is it hilarious but it also confirms what's already so obvious about you. This is what I mean by appreciating how lacking in self-awareness Trumphumpers are. And btw, I prefer to refer to him as ****bag which is much more descriptive.

 

[Condor060]

Not only is it hilarious but it also confirms what's already so obvious about you. This is what I mean by appreciating how lacking in self-awareness Trumphumpers are. And btw, I prefer to refer to him as ****bag which is much more descriptive.

Looks more like Liberals are just all a flutter. Since Trump has raised over $240 million in donations (Which is more than all 20 Dumbocrats combined), the DNC is broke and over $10 million in debt while the RNC has over $70 million, you are left with nothing more than whinny threads and personal attacks.

Typical though

 

[digitusmedius]

Looks more like Liberals are just all a flutter. Since Trump has raised over $240 million in donations (Which is more than all 20 Dumbocrats combined), the DNC is broke and over $10 million in debt while the RNC has over $70 million, you are left with nothing more than whinny threads and personal attacks.

Typical though

I find it hilarious that you think money is going to win it for your ****bag. I also note that your numbers are wildly bull****ted which is no surprise. Here's a summary table of inflows and outflows of the presidential candidates (as of last FEC report on July 15):



Note specifically the "cash on hand" column where Dems have more than two and a half times more. Of course, once the Dem field is winnowed down, the donation flow will increase dramatically for the top two or three standing after the first round of primaries. But please do go on whistling past the graveyard.

 

[Jay59]

Au contraire. I relish comments like that from buffoons who actually think something as ridiculous as that and then put it up in writing for all to see what buffoons they are. Merci beaucoup.

Just so we are clear, the clearly demonstrable success of Trump's Presidency does not matter, in your opinion. Good to know.

 

[tres borrachos]

When you have to get Lou Dobbs to do this to try to boost morale things must be awful for their Dear Leader:



The N. Korean minister of propaganda couldn't have done a better job for his Dear Leader.

Dobbs has lost it.

 

[Jay59]

I find it hilarious that you think money is going to win it for your ****bag. I also note that your numbers are wildly bull****ted which is no surprise. Here's a summary table of inflows and outflows of the presidential candidates (as of last FEC report on July 15): Note specifically the "cash on hand" column where Dems have more than two and a half times more. Of course, once the Dem field is winnowed down, the donation flow will increase dramatically for the top two or three standing after the first round of primaries. But please do go on whistling past the graveyard.

They had a lot more money in 2016, better polling, party incumbency, and something resembling party unity.

I know facts mean little to you, but I hope there is some threshold where you realize there was strychnine in your Kool-aid.

 

[digitusmedius]

Just so we are clear, the clearly demonstrable success of Trump's Presidency does not matter, in your opinion. Good to know.

Crystal clear: The Trumphumper Delirium Syndrome is especially strong today.

 

[digitusmedius]

They had a lot more money in 2016, better polling, party incumbency, and something resembling party unity.

I know facts mean little to you, but I hope there is some threshold where you realize there was strychnine in your Kool-aid.

You mean in an election year which this isn't? Nice try, pookie--but we're going to have to cut you. Maybe come back and try out again next year when it matters.

 

[Jay59]

You mean in an election year which this isn't? Nice try, pookie--but we're going to have to cut you. Maybe come back and try out again next year when it matters.

Does the amount of obfuscation you do make you dizzy? You seem to be confused about who you are responding to.

Next year, do you mean before or after Trump's reelection?

 

[digitusmedius]

Does the amount of obfuscation you do make you dizzy? You seem to be confused about who you are responding to.

Next year, do you mean before or after Trump's reelection?

You cited 2016 for you alleged numbers. That was the election year. This is 2019--not an election year even by the Trumphumper calendar. Not that it matters to anyone else but desperate Trumphumpers but the money side of the next election will certainly look much different a year from now that it does today. BTW, Clinton vastly outraised ****bag in 2016 (see below)and it didn't get her into the WH--a fact that Trumphumpers have enjoyed pointing that out in the past, maybe even you have done so and now want to play on the other side of the net. I love toying with you lot.

 

[digitusmedius]

They had a lot more money in 2016, better polling, party incumbency, and something resembling party unity.

I know facts mean little to you, but I hope there is some threshold where you realize there was strychnine in your Kool-aid.

So now you're trying to argue that ****bag's fundraising is going to propel him into a second term while you admit that it didn't work for Clinton. I think there's LSD in your drink, rookie. As for polling, I think you've forgotten one of the other things that Trumphumpers have been braying about ever since the election and that was how the Clinton campaign blew it in the 3 states that gave ****bag the presidency. Of course, we've since learned that Manafort played a big roll in that when he turned the campaign's raw polling data to the Russians who deluged the internet with Hillaryhate in those states during the last month of the campaign. Do you carry around the rake you keep stepping on or do you just keep looking for one?

 

[What if...?]

A second thread of Democrats being hysterically outraged at Lou Dobbs for praising the president. :lamo

Personally I just have no taste.for.lickspittle.dogs.

 

[Jay59]

You cited 2016 for you alleged numbers. That was the election year. This is 2019--not an election year even by the Trumphumper calendar. Not that it matters to anyone else but desperate Trumphumpers but the money side of the next election will certainly look much different a year from now that it does today. BTW, Clinton vastly outraised ****bag in 2016 (see below)and it didn't get her into the WH--a fact that Trumphumpers have enjoyed pointing that out in the past, maybe even you have done so and now want to play on the other side of the net. I love toying with you lot.

View attachment 67263935

So now you're trying to argue that ****bag's fundraising is going to propel him into a second term while you admit that it didn't work for Clinton. I think there's LSD in your drink, rookie. As for polling, I think you've forgotten one of the other things that Trumphumpers have been braying about ever since the election and that was how the Clinton campaign blew it in the 3 states that gave ****bag the presidency. Of course, we've since learned that Manafort played a big roll in that when he turned the campaign's raw polling data to the Russians who deluged the internet with Hillaryhate in those states during the last month of the campaign. Do you carry around the rake you keep stepping on or do you just keep looking for one?

You seem to be confused, so I will use simple words.

Donald Trump has been a good President. He will be reelected because he is a good President.

Do you understand now?

 

[SDET]

What low information analysis you have there. There's a primary contest going on and the Dems are going to chew that up against each other. How facile can you get?

I find it hilarious that you think money is going to win it for your ****bag. I also note that your numbers are wildly bull****ted which is no surprise. Here's a summary table of inflows and outflows of the presidential candidates (as of last FEC report on July 15):

View attachment 67263911

Note specifically the "cash on hand" column where Dems have more than two and a half times more. Of course, once the Dem field is winnowed down, the donation flow will increase dramatically for the top two or three standing after the first round of primaries. But please do go on whistling past the graveyard.

 

[Bullseye]

When you have to get Lou Dobbs to do this to try to boost morale things must be awful for their Dear Leader:



The N. Korean minister of propaganda couldn't have done a better job for his Dear Leader.

Where do you see any indication Trump "got" Dobbs to write this. Have you LOOKED at the economy lately? But "Trump!:twisted:" right?

 

[digitusmedius]

What low information analysis you have there. There's a primary contest going on and the Dems are going to chew that up against each other. How facile can you get?

I can't argue with obstinate idiocy like that.

 

[digitusmedius]

Where do you see any indication Trump "got" Dobbs to write this. Have you LOOKED at the economy lately? But "Trump!:twisted:" right?

Where did you get the idea that anyone made that claim? Was it when you last visited you ****bag's ***hole? And the only thing ****bag has done for the economy is take what Obama left him and not **** it up.....yet. But he's working on it.