You mean you love the high unemployment, the government takeovers, the socialism being forced on us??
republicans leading IN MICHIGAN by between 15 and 22 points has nothing to do with health care...
LOL!
you got a LINK for THAT?
LOLOL!
I have explained this to you repeatedly. The fact you don't understand and assume that it has to be for the reason you think is a weakness in you. You have made no effort to link the two, and since the governor has zero control over legislation passed in Washington, it hardly seems likely that it would have a significant influence.
The real reasons for the republican lead, once again:
1) we alternate parties for our governor, and have since the 60's.
2) Economy is especially bad in Michigan, making people want to change
3) the republican candidates have pretty good name recognition here, the dems, not so much
4) it's freaking March, neither party has even picked a candidate yet...
Go ahead though and keep making you ignorant assumptions. It gives me something to laugh at.
Its really unfair for you to use facts in your arguments. You should be using your feelings :2wave:
you don't sound like a fella who's laughing
LOLOL!
1) we alternate parties for our governor, and have since the 60's.
2) Economy is especially bad in Michigan, making people want to change
3) the republican candidates have pretty good name recognition here, the dems, not so much
4) it's freaking March, neither party has even picked a candidate yet...
Did I say one term? We have alternated parties when we change governor since I was a kid. Last time we had 2 consecutive governors of the same parts was when Milikin followed Romney in the 60's. History, it's good to learn.ouch, those poor keys
the reason REPUBLICANS are leading in MICHIGAN by such HUGE margins is cuz wolverines CHANGE PARTIES EVERY 4 YEARS?
LOL!
do they always do so by 20 points?
nothing about foreclosures?
LOL!
Nope, cut that budget and let them live with the political climate they created, on both sides.We need to have an armed SWAT team guarding every congressional office! Put a few snipers and CIA agents around the building too... :shock:
The only fact he used was that polling has republican candidates for governor ahead of democratic candidates.
You say tomato........You can of course show solid evidence of illegal bribery. Remember, dealing is not bribery.
Rahm Emmanuel cornering politicians, Chicago style politics, etc.Again, evdidence that the law was broken in relation to coercion.
If they are found to be beyond acceptable ethics, then of course there is a chance.And you can of course show that there is any chance of a successful challenge based on these.
I'm not whining, I hate the bill, but hey, I can sell insurance, and the bill will increase premiums. Even though Americana ****ed ourselves royally by voting in this particular adm. and congress into power and they in turn ****ed the entire American political spectrum I can make more money. I'm just asking people to be honest about what happened here. Best yet, I take no blame in any of it, the people I voted for tried to do things the right way.Judgment call at best. If it is not allowed under the rules, you can of course prove it. If it is, you are just whining.
Be honest Redress, the whole process is rife with stories of wide scale abuses.Threats are not legal, so I am sure you can point to where law enforcement is investigating these allegations.
Correct, if the thing is not repealed the court will be the judge eventually. As to unsupported allegations.....there is plenty of evidence that something fishy took place, but hey, the congress or a special prosecutor would have to look at the case, and it is at the discretion of a majority congress that just voted for the bill......so......I'm not expecting anything to come out in particular.The courts will determine whether this was constitutional. For the rest, you are making alot of unsupported allegations of illegal acts, none of which you are backing up. What it really looks like is some one who cannot accept that you did not get your way politically. I am sorry, Bush and the republican congress is gone, you had your chance. Now it's our turn. The people legally elected who they wanted to represent them in congress, and those people did what they said they would do. Don't like it, well boo hoo. Your crying is getting uninteresting.
Moderator's Warning: |
Last time we had 2 consecutive governors of the same parts was when Milikin followed Romney in the 60's
Foreclosures are not covered by "bad economy"?
It doesn't get more ignorant this this.What you fail to understand is some toothless rednecks are actually too stupid to read -- they see "Congressman" and just start shootin'...
The only fact he used was that polling has republican candidates for governor ahead of democratic candidates. He offered no comparison before and after health care passed, not any reasons being given by those polled for their selections. In other words, he guessed based on ignorance. Funny how you did not realize that...
Well, yes and no. The point is that everyone is trying to say that the popularity of this bill was misrepresented like it actually matters in the long run, the fact is it's not. And no I didn't vote for Obama, I barely voted for McCain and not willingly, I didn't want a rubber stamp administration and well, my side lost.
Everyone? Everyone is trying to say that the popularity of the bill was misrepresented? In what respect?
The fact that you didn't vote for Obama is significant. Those who did, knew the reasons they were doing so, health care reform was chief among them. I spent several weekends knocking on doors for Obama and it was very prominent in the literature I was given in order to answer any questions I encountered.
Further, based on what I've seen posted here, many members who voted against Obama, must have done so from a broader ideological difference rather than the details of his platform. Perhaps they were focused on specific issues of greater interest to them?
It's surprising to me that conservatives can say that health care didn't seem important during the election. It was always going to be at the forefront of issues Obama intended to confront upon his entry into the White House.
i like some guns.
Everyone? Everyone is trying to say that the popularity of the bill was misrepresented? In what respect?
The fact that you didn't vote for Obama is significant. Those who did, knew the reasons they were doing so, health care reform was chief among them. I spent several weekends knocking on doors for Obama and it was very prominent in the literature I was given in order to answer any questions I encountered.
Further, based on what I've seen posted here, many members who voted against Obama, must have done so from a broader ideological difference rather than the details of his platform. Perhaps they were focused on specific issues of greater interest to them?
It's surprising to me that conservatives can say that health care didn't seem important during the election. It was always going to be at the forefront of issues Obama intended to confront upon his entry into the White House.
Health care reform WAS popular. This health care reform is NOT popular.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?