- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
- Messages
- 43,134
- Reaction score
- 16,115
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
It is an observation.
My statement stands. You didn't even back up your accusations. There was no substance.
It is an observation.
Why is it that the results of Trump don't support your claim of a train wreck? Your opinion is trumped by the actual results as the American people including you are better off today than 3 years ago. The problem is you know it but cannot admit it
Rep. Lawrence is mindful that Michigan voted for trump in the last general election, and may have used a radio station to solidify her constituents and to protect her job. One data point does not reflect upon the concern of Democrats in general that trump is unfit to be President of the United States.
That isn't true and is a dem talking point. You have the wrong election. The public testimony of the last week clearly pointed out Trump was interested in the machinations of the 2016 election. Biden (and son) were from the BO administration before the 2016 election.
In your mind, do you get paid holiday pay? I know Putin appreciates your activities
KT McFarland: Division created by impeachment is '''Putin'''s dream''' | Fox News
He can't keep staff. He has no idea on how to run the government. Continuity is what he calls the Deep State. The economy is fine, but there's more to good government than that.
Yes. Namely the Ukraine. But never fear, the Trump DOJ (and Giuliani) are on the case.
That's just your usual "everybody has to do what Trump wants" propaganda. Funny how you didn't feel that way 10 years ago. I wonder what changed...
Yes. Namely the Ukraine. But never fear, the Trump DOJ (and Giuliani) are on the case.
The only career positions seem to be Congressional representatives. Staff positions are always temporary. Continuity is only an issue for Democrats who have been after Trump since his election. For some reason you cannot see how the left is manipulating you and how radicals are running today's Democratic Party
Good gov't? Good gov't is an oxymoron the left as a code word for massive gov't. Good Gov't from our Founders was LIMITED Federal gov't with power closer to the American people, state and local!!
KT McFarland: Division created by impeachment is '''Putin'''s dream''' | Fox News
Is he really though? Clinton wss corrupt but competent. She knew hi6w things worked kn Washington and certainly knew tgat healthcare was "hard." Trump is corrupt and a train wreck. Is a corrupt train wreck really better than corrupt competency?
Yeah, you're just spewing Trump propaganda again. What about results versus rhetoric? How many Chiefs of Staff has he had? I mean, that person is hand picked by the President and he's had 3 or 4 in 3 years.
What Trump wants? What promises did Trump make that he hasn't fulfilled or isn't trying to fulfill? Funny how you think you know how I felt 10 years ago. I saw an unqualified individual with no leadership, executive, or management experience nominated by the Democrats. That didn't matter as he was a "white board" being whatever you wanted him to be. Then 8 years later the results show his resume fulfilled, worst recovery in American history
So tell us how his staff affects you and your family? Why does it matter how many he has had? Is his staff important to the American people? You seem to ignore results to focus on non important issues like is staff. Have you ever taken a civics class? Where is the President's staff recognized in the Constitution or civics? You apparently have no concept as to the role of the President which Trump is fulfilling well!!
Yes, because corrupt competency is more dangerous.
So he should just fire them all? Where in the Constitution is the Secretary of State? Fire Pompeo i guess. We don't need him.
That is his choice, how has his staff changes affected you, your family, or the country? I assure you that you will grow out of this ignorance, I did grow out of my ignorance regarding the Democratic Party and their massive support for dependence and huge gov't
Is that why a wapo journalist said on national TV over the weekend that many democrats who supported the hearings are now worried it might cost them getting reelected?
Is that why 4 polls in the last week have all shown support for impeachment by independent voters has plummeted by an average of 10 points?
Is that the reason Gallup reports that Trump's public approval overall has gone up 2 points since the hearings, and his disapproval has gone down 3?
Is that the reason Vanity Fair just published an article saying that based on their own data, it suggests that democrats pushing for impeachment could end up alienating key independent voters?
Is that the reason a new poll from Emerson (listed as the second most accurate pollster of the 2016 election) shows support for Trump among black voters has nearly doubled from last months poll to 34%, and Hispanic support for him jumped 12 points to 38%?
In your mind, do you get paid holiday pay?
My statement stands. You didn't even back up your accusations. There was no substance.
Someday maybe you'll outgrow the Republican party too. Let me know when you're mature enough for that.
Are you saying that the Secretary of State has no effect on foreign policy?
The latest poll reveals that 50% support impeachment and removal from office. It also reports that 52% believe that Democrats have used their power correctly.
Gallup disagrees with any poll that states that Trump's support has doubled. Even Emerson, the people who took the poll, warn that there is an over 8% margin of error. The idea that Trump's support among blacks went from 17.8% one month earlier to 34%, is suspect. But, keep counting your chickens.
I'd bet anything that Trump's support among blacks in the general election will fall. In fact, the African Americans that stayed home I predict will come out in droves to vote against him.
Someday maybe you'll outgrow the Republican party too. Let me know when you're mature enough for that.
Are you saying that the Secretary of State has no effect on foreign policy?
It is only in YOUR MIND that I get paid for this.
KA CHING!!!!! :lamo
On that note, what is the Republican Party? The Republican Party used to consider itself the party of family values; believed in free trade; believe that the government shouldn't pick winners and losers; believed in lowering the deficit and debt, etc.Someday maybe you'll outgrow the Republican party too. Let me know when you're mature enough for that.
Are you saying that the Secretary of State has no effect on foreign policy?