- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 45,032
- Reaction score
- 22,768
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
So you are assuming for the sake of argument that there are benign reasons for this bill?I don't live in FL, so I couldn't say?
So you are assuming for the sake of argument that there are benign reasons for this bill?I don't live in FL, so I couldn't say?
There are days when I am strongly tempted to believe that "Education is an anti-priority in America.".Teachers are preparing to leave, and I don't mean 1 or 2.
Poor pay and terrible working conditions are one thing, loss of classroom sovereignty is another. With almost no inflow into college teaching programs, we are going to see teacher shortage's increase. If I had a dollar for every parent who falsely claimed they were going to send their kids to private school or homeschool them, pay would not be an issue.
A nation funds its' priorities. Education is not a priority in America.
Why?Have you ever been in a classroom?
No, teachers do not lead discussions on student crushes., ever. That would be completely inappropriate.
You don't know what what the **** 'normal' is.Normalizing the abnormal isn't a sound practice.
A problem with the movers and shakers is that they also have the income to live in better school districts or move their kid to private schools.There are days when I am strongly tempted to believe that "Education is an anti-priority in America.".
For the "movers and shakers" education IS a priority for the children of the "movers and shakers class", but for the children of others it is an impediment to the fulfillment of the desires of the "movers and shakers class". For the children of those who do not belong to the "movers and shakers class" a docile, unquestioning, and status-accepting" nature is much preferable to having children who are "informed, questioning, and equality of opportunity seeking".
Why shouldn't teachers lead classroom discussions about their student's relationships? lol.Why?
Well, it isn't a problem FOR the "movers and shakers" and if everyone else didn't choose to live in those school districts or didn't choose to send their kids to private schools (average tuition $12,350 a year) then it wouldn't be a problem for those who were not "movers and shakers" either - would it?A problem with the movers and shakers is that they also have the income to live in better school districts or move their kid to private schools.
I don't disagree with your occasional sentiment, I join you far too often for my liking.
Not their students relationships per se. I'm not not advocating Mrs. Johnson to announce to the class that Billy has a crush on Tommy. However a general discussion on how crushes work and how to go from there should be taught in schools.Why shouldn't teachers lead classroom discussions about their student's relationships? lol.
Math, reading, and writing are foundational skills but hardly sufficient for even an elementary education.Yes, they are. And what you are wanting is no different, you want YOUR brand of "insert social agenda" taught in a public school setting.
just teach Math, Reading, Writing.
Currently they are failing to do so at acceptable levels.
True, and, unfortunately, the American educational system is doing a really poor job of teaching those foundational skills.Math, reading, and writing are foundational skills but hardly sufficient for even an elementary education.
It's national business. Hatred is a national problem. Our society is bound to be more accepting of orientation diversity when our young citizens are familiar with it. By teaching this in schools, our nation is reducing hate attacks in the future.But once again, none of your business to interfere with no matter how badly you wish to.
This is true enough, it is also a good argument for teachers to not be adding things to the curriculum other than the objectively defined things that they are already failing to teach (and actually I can't put that on all the teachers) but certainly students aren't learning.True, and, unfortunately, the American educational system is doing a really poor job of teaching those foundational skills.
Part of the reason for that is that it is possible to actually give objectively determined grades for those subjects and where you can have objectively determined grades you can have objectively determined assessments of whether or not the student has actually managed the required material, and where you can have objectively determined assessments of whether or not the student has actually managed the required material you can have students who "F■■l" and that makes it difficult for you to pass kids on to the next grade so that they do not f■■l bad.
Republicans do not have any problems with "Black Republicans" or "Gay Republicans", they just don't want them living in their neighborhoods or them having anything to do with their children or to associate with them socially.
Link?Republicans do not have any problems with "Black Republicans" or "Gay Republicans", they just don't want them living in their neighborhoods or them having anything to do with their children or to associate with them socially.
If stopping hatred was of primary importance, we wouldn't have two polarized political parties, with stances, who try to demonize the other (and all the constituents at every chance). Or try to split people by racial divide or haves and have nots.It's national business. Hatred is a national problem. Our society is bound to be more accepting of orientation diversity when our young citizens are familiar with it. By teaching this in schools, our nation is reducing hate attacks in the future.
T
There are also a plethora of ignorant teachers with an agenda who would love to teach our kids how they should explore being non-binary and experiment with the same sex if they they see fit, even if said kids never mention feeling a certain way.
If stopping hatred was of primary importance, we wouldn't have two polarized political parties, with stances, who try to demonize the other (and all the constituents at every chance). Or try to split people by racial divide or haves and have nots.
It's all divisive.
No, it doesn't.Or split people between straights and gays, which is what this law does.
That is whataboutism.If stopping hatred was of primary importance, we wouldn't have two polarized political parties, with stances, who try to demonize the other (and all the constituents at every chance). Or try to split people by racial divide or haves and have nots.
It's all divisive.
But this isn't congress, and I don't know what the Florida constitution or main guiding documents/laws say.I seem to remember this Amendment that said, “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech…”
Republicans want to control what people believe. They don't want to allow people the freedom to believe stuff other than what they believe. They're pissed off at themselves because they lost the gay marriage battle. They refuse to accept it, so they are pathetically trying to do whatever they can to limit understanding of the 'forbidden knowledge.' (They call this 'owning the libs.') It really is shameful, and as you say, highly ironic coming from the same people who argue for 'personal freedoms.'States that pass laws criminalizing teaching, particularly topics that threaten the dominant culture, are generally authoritarian. This is sort of thing one would find in Russia or Nazi Germany.
It is always defended as the "will of the people" and in this case the people are are "parents." It is the will of the parents - dominant culture parents who feel threatened
Interesting that the common denominator in these cases is the threat of gays. For us, we can add race, although that certainly could extend to the Nazis as well.
Florida used to root out and fire gay teachers. It used to teach that racial segregation is right and normal. No doubt then, as now, politicians argued that it was the will of the people - expsoecially the parents, that thesevpolicies existed.
I dunno, but it seems unlikely that many people look back on this repression and bigotry with any pride, which makes it all the more perplexing that people support it now.
What truly adds an element of irony to it all is that it's the conservatives and libertarians who claim that they don't trust government who are so supportive of this now.
It's the evilness that the long history of White Nationalist Ideals and Delusion of Superiority has bred and fed into these people. It's made them think they are some fictional role model for society, as they think they have the right to dictate what is and is not acceptable in society, and they have the delusion to think they can ration to society only what they think society can have and what it can encompass.States that pass laws criminalizing teaching, particularly topics that threaten the dominant culture, are generally authoritarian. This is sort of thing one would find in Russia or Nazi Germany.
It is always defended as the "will of the people" and in this case the people are are "parents." It is the will of the parents - dominant culture parents who feel threatened
Interesting that the common denominator in these cases is the threat of gays. For us, we can add race, although that certainly could extend to the Nazis as well.
Florida used to root out and fire gay teachers. It used to teach that racial segregation is right and normal. No doubt then, as now, politicians argued that it was the will of the people - expsoecially the parents, that thesevpolicies existed.
I dunno, but it seems unlikely that many people look back on this repression and bigotry with any pride, which makes it all the more perplexing that people support it now.
What truly adds an element of irony to it all is that it's the conservatives and libertarians who claim that they don't trust government who are so supportive of this now.
No, it doesn't.
That's exactly what you were suggesting - at least that's how it appeared.Not their students relationships per se. I'm not not advocating Mrs. Johnson to announce to the class that Billy has a crush on Tommy. However a general discussion on how crushes work and how to go from there should be taught in schools.