• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hospitalizations skyrocket in kids too young for COVID shots

Phys251

Purge evil with Justice
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
70,375
Reaction score
70,805
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal

The worrisome trend in children too young to be vaccinated underscores the need for older kids and adults to get their shots to protect those around them, said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Since mid-December, as the highly contagious omicron variant has spread furiously around the country, the hospitalization rate in these youngest children has surged to more than 4 in 100,000 youngsters, up from 2.5 per 100,000.

That compares with a current rate of about 1 per 100,000 for children ages 5 to 17, according to CDC data.

4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.
 
During the Supreme Court hearings today on vaccine mandates they just stated that over 100,000 children were seriously ill and on vents.

There point was that the un-vaccinated pose the most risk to the un-vaccinated because it's looking like the Omicron is as deadly as Delta in those who are not vaccinated, including children who have no choice.

When you remained unmasked, and un-vaccinated you put others of all ages at risk. It's not just an individual choice.
 
During the Supreme Court hearings today on vaccine mandates they just stated that over 100,000 children were seriously ill and on vents.
As far as I can tell, that claim was incorrect and high by almost two orders of magnitude.
 
As far as I can tell, that claim was incorrect and high by almost two orders of magnitude.
Are you watching the SC hearings? That's the current information presented. It sounded alarmingly high to me as well but then I saw this thread and thought, well, maybe we're getting there.
 



4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.
The latest data I could find is that there are about 19 million children in the US aged 0 to 4 years old. That would translate to 760 children hospitalized across roughly 3 weeks. That's not good, of course, but hopefully this puts it in some perspective.
 
Are you watching the SC hearings? That's the current information presented. It sounded alarmingly high to me as well but then I saw this thread and thought, well, maybe we're getting there.
Sotomayer made the claim and I believe she is being roasted online for it as we speak. Based on my own searching, federal estimates are closer to ~3,000 children being hospitalized. This is why we should always double check numbers that we hear, and also put them in context.
 
Sotomayer made the claim and I believe she is being roasted online for it as we speak. Based on my own searching, federal estimates are closer to ~3,000 children being hospitalized. This is why we should always double check numbers that we hear, and also put them in context.
That matches what I thought, and makes sense. Yes, I was stunned when I heard it. There are over 100,000 un vaccinated people in the ICU, but they aren't all children. Maybe she got mixed up there.
 
That matches what I thought, and makes sense. Yes, I was stunned when I heard it. There are over 100,000 un vaccinated people in the ICU, but they aren't all children. Maybe she got mixed up there.
That's possible. If there are really 100,000 people in ICU due to COVID well, I don't know what the per-day ICU cost is but I'm sure it's well over $1,000 per day, which is a LOT of money down the toilet...
 



4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.

Be very wary of “kids hospitalized with COVID-19” - that is vastly different from “kids hospitalized due to COVID-19”. Everyone in the hospital testing positive for COVID-19 is “hospitalized with COVID-19”, even if they are being treated for a broken arm, a blood clot or cancer.
 



4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.
Sorry, not playing the progressive-Marxist game-lie of using emotion as a tool to whip up the collectivist mindset. That shit is as old as the hills. Go somewhere else and get the fiddle going.
 
Sorry, not playing the progressive-Marxist game-lie of using emotion as a tool to whip up the collectivist mindset. That shit is as old as the hills. Go somewhere else and get the fiddle going.

Mistaking a pandemic for a political event is a world-class category error, dude.

Congratulations. You have managed to formulate a means by which to not survive in a high tech society. You must be very proud.
 
That matches what I thought, and makes sense. Yes, I was stunned when I heard it. There are over 100,000 un vaccinated people in the ICU, but they aren't all children. Maybe she got mixed up there.
There are 96,000 ICU beds in the US so I have a seriously hard time believing there are 100,000 unvaccinated ICU patients.
 
That matches what I thought, and makes sense. Yes, I was stunned when I heard it. There are over 100,000 un vaccinated people in the ICU, but they aren't all children. Maybe she got mixed up there.
Nobody more mixed up and mal-informed than a ****ing progressive justice of the court.
 



4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.
Any kid who winds up in the hospital is a problem but honestly during the next month 3 or 4 times that number are likely to be injured in car accidents.
 
Mistaking a pandemic for a political event is a world-class category error, dude.

Congratulations. You have managed to formulate a means by which to not survive in a high tech society. You must be very proud.
WTF. I’m not referring to political events, dude. I’m referring to that ****ing 2-bit mindset that pervades everything.
 
It's almost as if when you let a disease run loose, it does things you weren't expecting.
Down the line, the math will be in proving that your beloved mask joke and jab lie will have done just about nothing vs. letting the Fauci-Xi virus run its course to natural herd immunity.

Mark my words right here and now. Period.
 
Down the line, the math will be in proving that your beloved mask joke and jab lie will have done just about nothing vs. letting the Fauci-Xi virus run its course to natural herd immunity.

Mark my words right here and now. Period.

I'll be here to see the results. I wouldn't bet a plug nickel on your odds.

But just for shits and grins, how many diseases have died out from herd immunity without vaccines? Can you guess?
 
WTF. I’m not referring to political events, dude. I’m referring to that ****ing 2-bit mindset that pervades everything.

You absolutely are treating this as a political matter.
 



4 in 100,000 may not sound like much, but it adds up. And low probabilities mean nothing if it's your child that gets hit.
5 in a hundred thousand kids end up in hospital after playing with their friends …what kind of parent lets their child play, sick , uncaring bastards.

Why are liberals so shit at risk assessment?
 
It’s really clear that liberals are desperate to jab kids against a non-existent risk with an experimental drug. Liberals are ****ing freaks.
 
5 in a hundred thousand kids end up in hospital after playing with their friends …what kind of parent lets their child play, sick , uncaring bastards.

Why are liberals so shit at risk assessment?
Because underneath it all, it is they who are the most self serving, pathetic, arrogant, cowardly, fear-laden, loud mouthed weasels.
 
Because underneath it all, it is they who are the most self serving, pathetic, arrogant, cowardly, fear-laden, loud mouthed weasels.
There is something mentally wrong with someone pretending that kids are at risk from a disease , when they are not , and then using untested ( long term) drugs on them.
 
Back
Top Bottom