• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Honest question, why do you support gun control? [W:244]

:lamo

A generalisation take it or leave or prove me wrong.


:lamo

Quite honestly I found it the most boring useless waste of words I have ever seen. Curiosity got the better of me and I did check back and got even more tired of reading the drivel of some small mind trying desperately to score Brownie points..

My failure was to engage a cretin who responds to stuff 20 message back by picking some other post... Either you can prove different or eat it.


:lamo

Nobody does, not even you. Even less care. Do try to respond to the correct post in future. People are able to follow far better that way.


:lamo

You seem to have a needle stuck in an ego trip. I hope you get better soon.

still desperately trying to deflect from your mistake, proven wrong and failed post huh? well it wont help though the mistake was still yours :shrug:
failed insults wont help either, they are the common tactic used when somebody has no honest, intellectual, or supportable path to take. Good luck!
facts win again
 
Last edited:
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

Yeah, no due process says they have to break the law before you can strip away their rights and privileges, and that brain scan will just be abused.

We already have a process for that which to prevent abuse requires a court decision. The problem is the system and no system is perfect which allows people to fall through the cracks mainly due to OFFICIALS incompetence. I'm not sure if one can make the civil service competent or efficient.
 
still desperately trying to deflect from your mistake, proven wrong and failed post huh? well it wont help though the mistake was still yours :shrug:
failed insults wont help either, they are the common tactic used when somebody has no honest, intellectual, or supportable path to take. Good luck!
facts win again

What mistake. Your post contained no reference to anything you comment on. QED

The only error was yours responding to the wrong post.
 
What mistake. Your post contained no reference to anything you comment on. QED

The only error was yours responding to the wrong post.

another deflection and nothing changes, fact remains the mistake was yours, nothing will change this fact. Nothing
 
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

Sorry, I was being a bit sarcastic over there :) . Playing with irrational fears that I have come to pick about pro-Gunners whilst my time in DP.

I'm always interested in what others think. To what irrational fears do you refer?

My position is the following:

1) Guns will never go away, too late for that.

Well most do rust so that will get a good number of them:) Yes I know what you mean for any country the illegal arms pool is a seemly bottomless lake and many modern firearms are so easy to mass produce, that idea of shutting off this criminal supply is about as good as the tons of drugs shipped in each year. Besides no ban has ever worked. Why people keep thinking it is going to work next time speaks only of the propaganda promoting it.

2) Psychopaths, sociopaths, violent impulsive murderers and schizphrenic people should be kept away from guns. Brain scanning may help with that.

I have pondered over this one and the best approach. Like children are the parents responsibility do we really need a gun control law that says nobody below some arbitrary age may own/possess a firearm. What is the right age?

Many more people suffering from mental disorders are perfectly safe. Is it right to subject every potential disorder to a scan that may or may not help. Who will pay for these not inexpensive scans? This theory also works on a very much unproven theory that if a gun is denied the desire to commit an atrocity dies. Does it?
 
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

I'm always interested in what others think. To what irrational fears do you refer?

Thoughts like: The government is coming for your guns, and there is nothing you can do about it! Mwahahahaha!

Well most do rust so that will get a good number of them:) Yes I know what you mean for any country the illegal arms pool is a seemly bottomless lake and many modern firearms are so easy to mass produce, that idea of shutting off this criminal supply is about as good as the tons of drugs shipped in each year. Besides no ban has ever worked. Why people keep thinking it is going to work next time speaks only of the propaganda promoting it.

Guns and drugs do not belong on the same group though. No need to even compare them as such.

I have pondered over this one and the best approach. Like children are the parents responsibility do we really need a gun control law that says nobody below some arbitrary age may own/possess a firearm. What is the right age?

According to our Albanian codes, you issue a gun to your kid at age 15.

Many more people suffering from mental disorders are perfectly safe. Is it right to subject every potential disorder to a scan that may or may not help. Who will pay for these not inexpensive scans? This theory also works on a very much unproven theory that if a gun is denied the desire to commit an atrocity dies. Does it?

The prices should drop if there is a greater use for brain scanners.

Do not know if an atrocity dies should the gun be denied, but at least guns will not be associated with psychopaths, sociopaths, impulsive murderers, and paranoid schisophrenics. These are doing much harm to pro-gun people, and thus should be removed out of the equation.
 
Well you're just determined to have an argument aren't you.

First off, before I am misrepresented, I don't think gun laws would work in the US and as a pragmatist am not for them in the US (with the exception of open carry - I'm all for banning open carry).

Really? How is self defense silly?

Really? Which ones?

Well it was 238 years ago.

Your rights do now change because the date on the calender. Your rights are timeless and are non the less important regardless of what time period you live in.

Although a discussion for another time, I don't believe in natural rights, nor do I believe rights are timeless. I don't believe guns are necessary for self defense, particularly when the rest of the populace (and thus those committing crimes) are unarmed.

In some cases yes.

How else is a 120 Lbs women supposes to defend herself against a rapist?

How is a WWII vet able supposes to defend himself against a home invader?

How is a teacher going to save her students against a crazed killer?

Right because owning a gun stops all these crimes from happening. What a dishonest argument.

Really? Why is that? Maybe because you are proven wrong?

According to the FBI, there were 1.2 million violent crimes committed in the US during 2011. FBI — Violent Crime

According to the UK government, there were 1.94 million violent crimes in the UK during 2011. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_296191.pdf

I just told you you can't compare UK and US gun crime stats because they are counted differently. The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports defines a “violent crime” as one of four specific offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. The British Home Office, by contrast, has a substantially different definition of violent crime. The British definition includes all “crimes against the person,” including simple assaults, all robberies, and all “sexual offenses,” as opposed to the FBI, which only counts aggravated assaults and “forcible rapes.”

None | Search Results | Daily Mail Online

Screen+Shot+2012-12-22+at++Saturday,+December+22,+9.26+PM.png


So not only is their more violent crime and stabbings but now people have no means of defending themselves.

Now they have stabbing, glassing(smashing bottles over the heads of people who are robbed or raped) rapes, Home invasions ect and now no means of self defense..

You see disarming people and making them helpless against criminals as "progress"? That is regression, nothing more.

Violent crime has fallen year on year in the UK since 1995, the gun ban was introduced in 1997. While there was a short term increase in homicides that has fallen back down massively. I would also say that if gun violence has just morphed into violent crime, then I would much rather be beat up in a mugging than shot. Now, I could talk about those UK homicide rates being far lower than the US's, but that would also be fallacious. Again, they are counted differently and as such are very difficult to compare to one another. Don't let anyone, pro or anti gun, tell you otherwise.

Why did you move here?

Lower taxes?

Lower costs of living?

More freedom?

More to live then being a victim of people who are strong or cruel enough to take it and everything in it.

Well the weather had a lot to do with it.....

trust me, it is completely impossible, and that bottom up approach and grassroots change in how guns are perceived by the American public is lead by those that defend and are advancing the cause of freedom and the means of protecting it, The 2nd Amendment.

Its more then just a gun culture, it is a freedom culture, one that values Individualism over Collectivism and Liberty over Tyranny.

Equating access to guns to freedom is a fallacy. In economic and press freedom indices the US essentially received B grades (other countries did get A - not the UK). Furthermore, some people consider freedom from guns to be a type of freedom. Gun culture makes the US different from the UK and Aus, but you'll be hard pressed in England to find the average person on the street who disagrees with gun control. Gun ownership is steadily declining in the US. While I'm sure there is a hardcore core of people who keep hold of their guns, more and more people find them unnecessary or dangerous as violent crime etc falls in the US.
 
While I'm sure there is a hardcore core of people who keep hold of their guns, more and more people find them unnecessary or dangerous as violent crime etc falls in the US.

With the inevitable decline of civilization fast approaching it would be short sighted and irresponsible to disarm one's self.
 
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

I don't.

I support civil liberty.

One can support civil rights, OR gun control - not both.
 
It's precisely non-reality based responses like this that lead me to support gun control measures.

With every natural resource in unsustainable decline and undeniable global warning (I'd mention earth's decreasing magnetic field but you would not know what that means) what do you think the out come is? Some gun free utopia?

Now would you care to explain your incorrect comment and why you support gun control?
 
With every natural resource in unsustainable decline and undeniable global warning (I'd mention earth's decreasing magnetic field but you would not know what that means) what do you think the out come is? Some gun free utopia?

Now would you care to explain your incorrect comment and why you support gun control?

LOL. Please fill me in on the magnetic field thing. Sounds like a wonderful story.

Glad to know you're concerned about every natural resource being in decline. Hopefully for your sake, brass and lead don't run out first, otherwise you'll have a great collection of clubs when your secular apocalypse comes (won't it be exciting? Like the Rapture for gun nuts! You get to shoot who you want!).
 
As I expected.

What's it like to live in fear all the time? Justifying it as 'just being prepared' is probably a nice psychological crutch, though.

Says the guy that believes in the global climate change catastrophe.

I look at it this way, when the climate change causes the catastrophe the IPCC predicts and the only food left is a Twinkie factory I'll be eating Twinkies and you will be wishing you had a gun :lamo

BTW - If the only thing that allows you to deal with your fear of guns is to think those of us that have them live in fear knock yourself out, it won't change a thing, we will still be armed and you still won't.
 
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

Thoughts like: The government is coming for your guns, and there is nothing you can do about it! Mwahahahaha!

I get the impression this is not serious to you.

OK that is two things

Are you saying government does not want citizens guns which is the only way that can be irrational. Care to prove that so I can be sure.

The other "there's nothing you can do about it" I'm not sure is any firearm owners claims. Do you have an example?

Guns and drugs do not belong on the same group though. No need to even compare them as such.

This is a non sequitur argument and has nothing to do with what I claimed. Let me repeat for clarity and maybe you can address it now. Do you think the supply of guns can be stopped any better that the supply of drugs. We know that it takes a very little time to find drugs in any place you like. Why should guns not be the same?

Well most do rust so that will get a good number of them Yes I know what you mean for any country the illegal arms pool is a seemly bottomless lake and many modern firearms are so easy to mass produce, that idea of shutting off this criminal supply is about as good as the tons of drugs shipped in each year. Besides no ban has ever worked. Why people keep thinking it is going to work next time speaks only of the propaganda promoting it.

According to our Albanian codes, you issue a gun to your kid at age 15.

The only people I know who want to issue guns or expect everyone to have one is gun control advocates. Do you have any examples of firearm owners claiming mandatory ownership? There is something that a cultures right of passage might not be a good example.

The prices should drop if there is a greater use for brain scanners.

Any idea what MRI equipment costs? Who is going to pay for the increase in equipment needed and why will prices drop? Where are the experts coming from to interpret the readings. This is not some go no go test. Does gun control not tell anyone what they are proposing. Even then have you forgotten that MAY in the accuracy, I pretty much think so.

Do not know if an atrocity dies should the gun be denied, but at least guns will not be associated with psychopaths, sociopaths, impulsive murderers, and paranoid schisophrenics. These are doing much harm to pro-gun people, and thus should be removed out of the equation.

Are you saying there is a direct relationship between guns and atrocities? That really really is going to need proof.

Gun control advocates lie, pervert the truth, distort facts and have no moral conscious. The very fact they can link very few mentally disturbed people with guns is testament to the abject ignorance that exists. One would think firearm organisations/owners in self defence would make an effort to change that and defuse gun controls advertising (propaganda) campaign.

I worry about people who are willing to deny others rights when they have done nothing to deserve that. Really I do. I think they are the scum of the earth. Natures aberrant outcasts with defective brains. People this the world could well do without. How do you feel about such people? I wonder if a MRI test could identify them so we can prevent them from polluting other peoples minds.
 
Last edited:
Re: Honest question, leftist why do you support gun control?

Are you saying there is a direct relationship between guns and atrocities?

In fact there is, when governments are the only ones that have them, which is ironically what the gun control advocates want.
 
LOL. Please fill me in on the magnetic field thing. Sounds like a wonderful story.

Glad to know you're concerned about every natural resource being in decline. Hopefully for your sake, brass and lead don't run out first, otherwise you'll have a great collection of clubs when your secular apocalypse comes (won't it be exciting? Like the Rapture for gun nuts! You get to shoot who you want!).

So once again like an empty vessel you have nothing but noise. Do you actually have anything intelligent to say? There is no point in telling you anything. You are incapable of absorbing new information and once again you have just proven that. Goggle might work for you. Try it.

when your secular apocalypse comes
quickly now how may has the earth had already?
 
Says the guy that believes in the global climate change catastrophe.

I look at it this way, when the climate change causes the catastrophe the IPCC predicts and the only food left is a Twinkie factory I'll be eating Twinkies and you will be wishing you had a gun :lamo

BTW - If the only thing that allows you to deal with your fear of guns is to think those of us that have them live in fear knock yourself out, it won't change a thing, we will still be armed and you still won't.

Well, I'm not 'afraid' of guns. But I think its become increasingly clear that the compulsion to have guns is rooted in fear, and papered over with pretensions of 'being prepared' and 'freedom', in addition to the understandable fun of having stuff that goes boom.

The odd thing is guys like you think sitting around in a twinkie factory with a gun is preferable than being outside the twinkie factory, when the truth is your attitude makes everyone more likely to be out of twinkies eventually.
 
So once again like an empty vessel you have nothing but noise. Do you actually have anything intelligent to say? There is no point in telling you anything. You are incapable of absorbing new information and once again you have just proven that. Goggle might work for you. Try it.

quickly now how may has the earth had already?

Thanks for sparing me the complex details of Earth's failing magnetic field. I just saw and improv comedy show last night, and one can only handle so many jokes in a week.
 
Well you're just determined to have an argument aren't you.

No, debate, which you seem to be losing.

First off, before I am misrepresented, I don't think gun laws would work in the US and as a pragmatist am not for them in the US (with the exception of open carry - I'm all for banning open carry).

So if they do not work, why ban open carry?

Criminals do not open carry, and it protected by not only the 2nd but also the 1st Amendment.

Although a discussion for another time, I don't believe in natural rights, nor do I believe rights are timeless. I don't believe guns are necessary for self defense, particularly when the rest of the populace (and thus those committing crimes) are unarmed.

Why?

So at some point in time will your right to free speech be obsolete?

Right because owning a gun stops all these crimes from happening. What a dishonest argument.

Stops or prevents a large major crimes from happening, saying you can prevent or stop all crime is not possible.

But you think it is better for people to be disarmed and helpless is better? Talk about inhuman.

I just told you you can't compare UK and US gun crime stats because they are counted differently. The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports defines a “violent crime” as one of four specific offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. The British Home Office, by contrast, has a substantially different definition of violent crime. The British definition includes all “crimes against the person,” including simple assaults, all robberies, and all “sexual offenses,” as opposed to the FBI, which only counts aggravated assaults and “forcible rapes.”

Sounds like someone can not defend against the increase in crime against a disarmed public.





Well the weather had a lot to do with it.....

Really?

So not having to put up with what a 3 dollar tax on a liter of petrol had nothing to do with?

Not living a nanny state had nothing to do with it?


Equating access to guns to freedom is a fallacy.

No it is a just equation, how are you free if you do not have the means of defending your life, freedom, rights, property against those that would usurp then.
In economic and press freedom indices the US essentially received B grades (other countries did get A - not the UK).

Are we perfect? Not a chance in Hell, might that scale be biased? maybe.


Furthermore, some people consider freedom from guns to be a type of freedom.
Easy, do not buy one, everyone wins, you do not have the right to take the rights/freedom away from other people.

Gun culture makes the US different from the UK and Aus, but you'll be hard pressed in England to find the average person on the street who disagrees with gun control.

Wrong..

85% Of British Want Their Guns Back | InvestmentWatch


New Poll Shows England Wants Its Guns Back | TheBlaze.com

I guess having rape gang, and people beheading people in the streets makes you want to be able to defend themselves...


Gun ownership is steadily declining in the US.
Wrong, yet again

guns-in-household-550.gif


(A) Landine phones are going the way of the dodo. Almost no one in my generation pays for one in their home, and a shrinking number of the older generation are doing the same. Cell phones are the new way to communicate, and those aren’t included in the polls.

(B) How would you feel if you received a call from a random stranger claiming to be from a polling agency and asking how much jewelry you have in your home? Or how much cash you carry around? Or if you leave your back door unlocked at night? This is especially frightening if you realize that land-line phone numbers all have an address associated with them. Is it really a polling agency calling or a burglar doing some recon work before stealing all your stuff? How can you tell the difference?

(C)Given the current environment and concern about Government oversight, NSA spying, etc, I would suggest that if people are going to lie during a poll, they are more likely to say that they don’t own a gun when they do as opposed to saying that they do own a gun when they don’t. I would argue that the number of people who don’t fess up to owning a gun may very well result in a few percentage points of error in the poll.



While I'm sure there is a hardcore core of people who keep hold of their guns, more and more people find them unnecessary or dangerous as violent crime etc falls in the US.

Well violent crime is a 50 year all time low, whole gun ownership grows higher and higher.
 
With the inevitable decline of civilization fast approaching it would be short sighted and irresponsible to disarm one's self.

It's precisely non-reality based responses like this that lead me to support gun control measures.

Really? Non reality?

Have you seen the world today?

Have you not studied history and seen that when civilizations decline or collapse, law and order are one of the first things to go?

So facts, reason, and history you support stripping away your right and means to defend yourself?
 
Back
Top Bottom