106 years of "Born that way"
From 1899 until just last month, scientific evidence of the biological roots of sexual orientation has continued to grow
From The Advocate, July 5, 2005
1899
Germany’s pioneering researcher Magnus Hirschfeld writes that being gay or lesbian is biologically determined.
1991
A study of twins reveals that genes and biology are markers for homosexuality. Researchers find that 52% of identical twin brothers of gay men were also gay, compared with 22% of fraternal twins and just 11% of adoptive brothers.
1991
Simon LeVay, after studying the brains of dead gay and straight men, publishes a paper in Science arguing that homosexuality is biologically based. He later expands his ideas in the 1993 book The Sexual Brain.
1993
In a major study that spurs cultural battles, researchers say they have identified a gene pattern that determines male homosexuality. A National Cancer Institute geneticist suggests that a gay gene resides in the X chromosome, which men inherit from their mothers.
1995 & 2005
A 1995 NIH study focuses on male fruit flies that began mating with each other after their body chemistry was changed. In June 2005, scientists in Vienna report that a genetically altered female fruit fly attempted to mate with another female fruit fly instead of a male, suggesting sexual attraction is genetic.
1999
A University of Texas researcher finds that the tones produced by the inner ears of lesbians are weaker and not as numerous as those produced by straight women.
2000
Researchers find further evidence linking sexual orientation with birth order. Men with same-sex attraction seem more likely to be born later than straight brothers in families with multiple male children.
2003
Psychologists measure eye-blink reactions after subjecting gay and straight men and women to loud noises. The reactions of gay and straight members of each gender are found to be significantly different and linked to an area of the brain that determines sexuality. They conclude that a person’s sexual orientation is determined before birth.
2004
The same genes that make men gay may also make their female relatives more fertile. Researchers find that the moms, sisters, and maternal aunts of gay men often have significantly more children than the mean—and many of their offspring are gay or lesbian as well.
2005
A genome researcher in Chicago says he has found a group of genes, not a single “gay gene,” that strongly affect whether a man is homosexual. The University of Illinois at Chicago and the NIH scientists report having looked at the genes of 456 men, each of whom had at least two gay brothers, from 146 families. The finding that a variety of genes are common to most gay men echoes other recent gene research.
__________________
january said:And by the way, with a little social acceptance and less "cure" talk, ya'll could get the rights you're guaranteed under the constitution, and you could have a family!
No people aren't born bi-polar. It is something that's developed over time. I speak from personal experience on this one. When I eat healthy and excersice regularly, I'm fine. I'm cool, I'm collected. If I don't, I'm a freaking basket case. I don't recall going "manic" in nursery school.
rudeboy said:I'm sure this has been talked about but I just signed up.
is homosexuality a choice?
alex said:It is interesting that vauge believes it is conditioned. I did not condition my self to be gay no more than someone conditions themself to be straight. One of my first memories as a young boy was being attracted to a man. Do you honestly believe that a 9 year old can condition themself to be gay? Do 9 year olds have this kind of thought process? I was attracted to men before I even knew what gay was. How could I possibly condition myself to be gay then? I honestly believe that I am misunderstanding what you wrote. Could you please elaborate?
This is no different than the homosexual question. Yes, somewhere along the way in your lifes adventures - red heads stood out for you. It is a deap core choice. Somehow, could be a conversation, could have been a joy ride - whatever it has conditioned you to enjoy female red heads more than blondes or brunettes.NoobieDoobieDo said:I never chose to like girls.
I never chose to like red heads more than the others.
And so on until I'm blue in the face.
Based upon this, I see no reason to believe people who aren't straight chose "that".
Naughty Nurse said:Good for you, making a choice you feel comfortable with.
I think that whatever shapes our sexuality (and none of us really knows the answer to that), it is absolutely not a choice.
When I was very young, and starting to become sexually aware, being gay was not a good option, but that was what I was, and it meant some very painful years of self-hatred, fear of a lonely, isolated future etc.
Would I have chosen that? Of course not!
vauge said:I just do not see it as that "cut and dry". If it truely was not enjoyable or interesting then it wouldn't happen.
Why did Christians proclaim thier Chrisitanity years ago when they knew they were going to be persecuted or it could result in death? Logically, that would seem silly to do when the rest of the area or world thought differently.
Many would say that they were "born that way". No, they were conditioned to have that belief system. Then they self conditioned themselves to have that integrity and way of life. It's a choice.
http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/answers.htmlIs Sexual Orientation a Choice?
No, human beings can not choose to be either gay or straight. Sexual orientation emerges for most people in early adolescence without any prior sexual experience. Although we can choose whether to act on our feelings, psychologists do not consider sexual orientation to be a conscious choice that can be voluntarily changed.
Pacridge said:My guess is they did that because they whole heartedly believed that proclaiming their Christianity would lead to ever lasting life in heaven, renouncing it would lead to ever lasting life in hell. But that's just a guess.
Kelzie said:If one identical twin is gay and 50% of the time the other one is, while the adopted brothers only have an 11% concordance, that is not conditioning, that is genes.
vauge said:This is no different than the homosexual question. Yes, somewhere along the way in your lifes adventures - red heads stood out for you. It is a deap core choice.
NoobieDoobieDo said:Is there any evidence that supports the theory that sexuality is a choice ?
vauge said:I gotta be honest, did not look over the data and accepted your excellent analysis at value. About the twins, was there a difference in the % if they were seperated at birth or grew up seperately?
vauge said:Obviously that did indeed play a factor, but only after they were conditioned to such and conditioned themselfs to believe that.
galenrox said:I'm pretty sure my mom wanted me (or my sister) to be gay. We live in an extrordinarily liberal town, and it's considered somewhat of a badge of honor to have a gay child, and to accept him/her for the way s/he is.
So if anything, I was conditioned to be gay, and I just love the women, can't help it, so I really don't buy the concept of being conditioned to be gay, because if it were true, why do I have a girlfriend? Why have I only done stuff with girls, and only been attracted to girls? Hmmm?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?