CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 108,796
- Reaction score
- 108,772
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Which is why she won.To paraphrase Kevin Williamson, the Clintons are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of American politics.
You got her now!https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...k-communications-campaign-manager-claims.html
This and more came out in trial today.
Jim Baker also testified that he is 100% sure that Sussman told him he was NOT representing any client when he brought the Alfa Bank info to the FBI.
The Clinton revelation isn't important for Sussman as he's only charged with lying to the FBI but Mook dropped direct the link to Hilary right in her lap.
That's nothing more than an educated opinion. Let's not get into the Liar in Chief, shall we?Because it's current news and this news about crooked Hillary came out today while Robby Mook, Clinton's campaign manager testified during the Michael Sussmann trial.
On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”
She lied, attempting to plant a false narrative in order to swing the election in her direction.
This pretty much ends her continued political ambitions.Hillary lied in a tweet? tsk, tsk.
They will when the acquittal happens. There is not much time for it when you consider the wife a conservative SC justice was working rigorously with states and WH officials to overturn Bidens win. Kinda takes precedent.It's noteworthy than most left leaning news sources are not covering the Sussmann trial at all. As usual, they only report what they want the public to know.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...k-communications-campaign-manager-claims.html
This and more came out in trial today.
Jim Baker also testified that he is 100% sure that Sussman told him he was NOT representing any client when he brought the Alfa Bank info to the FBI.
The Clinton revelation isn't important for Sussman as he's only charged with lying to the FBI but Mook dropped direct the link to Hilary right in her lap.
And Donald Trump...
Maybe.She will never be president!!!!
Many are.Well, if you think that Democrats are still that concerned with protecting Hillary Clinton
and the mythology of her 2016 presidential campaign (which, to reiterate yet again, was six years ago)
...yes, that would indicate that one of us is living in an information bubble.
I literally can't think of anything noteworthy she has said or done in years, or heard her name in any current event.HRC continues to keep herself in the news, and try to remain relevant. The Russia hoax was pushed by the MSM for 4 years, so, I guess them.
The whole trial is based around the idea of this so of course its in question. Lol..how ****ing absurdI don't think there's any question whatsoever that Sussman was acting on behalf of the campaign. I mean, among other things, he billed the campaign for his time while doing this.
The OP topic is literally a news story about Hillary from today.I literally can't think of anything noteworthy she has said or done in years, or heard her name in any current event.
But then, I'm not immersed in right-wing fever swamps. If you tell me she's still in the news there, I can believe it.
Mm-hmm.The OP topic is literally a news story about Hillary from today.
That actually is the question at hand.I don't think there's any question whatsoever that Sussman was acting on behalf of the campaign. I mean, among other things, he billed the campaign for his time while doing this.
That doesn’t fit in with the timeline of what actually happened in 2016.I feel like some people should understand what is the issue before discussing the matter. They created a fake narrative, faked data that they then took to the FBI and that launched pretty much all the fake Russian/Trump collusion narrative. With the FBI as bird dog in the hunt.
Projection of guilt and then the same op will cry about it with Elon Musk or somethingThat actually is the question at hand.
It is up to Durham to prove it
A fair correction.That doesn’t fit in with the timeline of what actually happened in 2016.
No, but her name was in the news today in case you missed it.Is Hillary Clinton finally on trial?
Daily Mail is so weird. It's like a tabloid but has serious news reporting too. I'm never sure what to make of their articles because it's never clear which one they're actually doing.Daily Mail.
LOL
Will the left media care? Some democrats may care but I doubt that most will. Trump hate runs pretty deep in the left and there seems to be a anything goes attitude to get him out of office and now to keep him from running again.Her argument, of course, will be that she had no idea any of the information was contrived and proving that will be a tough hill to climb, probably. That being said, her own guy just tied her to the scheme and that ain't a good look for her or for any of the media that backed her and bashed Trump over this stuff. Will the public care? Some will, some won't and the rest will just go along with whatever their peers say.
If you get your news from Rachael Maddow, no.That doesn’t fit in with the timeline of what actually happened in 2016.
That’s the only relevant facts related to whether Sussman committed the crime he is being accused. It’s clear Durham is barking up a tree.Leaking to the Press is not illegal. Yesterday Elias said that he would not have taken the info to the FBI.
If anything this is looking like Sussmann didn't act on behalf of the campaign... in fact his actions led to the NYT killing the story.
So, did it happen? Or is just another thread where a trump fan, still furious they lost in 2020 is crying their eyes out?https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...k-communications-campaign-manager-claims.html
This and more came out in trial today.
Jim Baker also testified that he is 100% sure that Sussman told him he was NOT representing any client when he brought the Alfa Bank info to the FBI.
The Clinton revelation isn't important for Sussman as he's only charged with lying to the FBI but Mook dropped direct the link to Hilary right in her lap.
No… from reading the Mueller report.If you get your news from Rachael Maddow, no.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?