OhIsee.Then
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,581
- Reaction score
- 277
- Location
- MI and AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Not exactly. Some will not change their mind when they have a health problem and trust in God. So, should we accomidate them by compromising a more optimum solution for the majority of people. I have posted several times in the past about a tea party family demonstration against Obama Care about 3 years ago. They owed the hospital over $90,000 for his care since only the wife had insurance. They had decided they couldn't afford to add him to her insurance. So instead of holding to their beliefs they were essentially asking me to pay for his hospital care.I assume you are in a flippant way saying that everyone needs healthcare. Even so, we can be forced into it.
Not exactly. Some will not change their mind when they have a health problem and trust in God. So, should we accomidate them by compromising a more optimum solution for the majority of people. I have posted several times in the past about a tea party family demonstration against Obama Care about 3 years ago. They owed the hospital over $90,000 for his care since only the wife had insurance. They had decided they couldn't afford to add him to her insurance. So instead of holding to their beliefs they were essentially asking me to pay for his hospital care.
Flippant?
So you would not support mandatory Universal healthcare in the United States since the supreme court has ruled the government can't force citizens into commerce according to our Constitution?
Apparently now it's mandatory. The other three are moot.I hope this is pretty self explanatory. What do you think? This'll be multiple choice and I'll include an "other". Give me a sec to get the poll up.
The Supreme court ruled that the government can apply a penalty tax to those who do not purchase health insurance...
Usually when governments want to disallow a behavior in the society they govern, they pass a law to criminalize it. I suppose that's what has been done in this case, making it illegal to not buy from a company... but so why the different names, e.g. "penalty tax?"
See uninsured motorists fee.
The Supreme court ruled that the government can apply a penalty tax to those who do not purchase health insurance, thus upholding the conservatives insurance mandate. I would have preferred the public option, and still believe we will have to make that upgrade eventually as most of the rest of the industrialized world has already done.
More lawsuits are going to follow.
Well do let us know how they turn out! In the meantime, health care reform is the rule of law.
Responsibility. Those without healthcare cost the taxpayers a boatload of money annually.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?