Im addressing this thread to the BP oil leak and Obamas decision to make changes in energy policy. I dont beleive him that he wants to drill less or reduce energy dependence on fossil fuels/ atomic energy in the short term, say 15 years.
It wouldnt be difficut for americans to consume less energy, compared to european consumption. It would require a mentality change, which one cannot expect. Grown-up on cheap oil, americans expect oil to remain cheap.
In Gemrany we pay 1.54€ per liter, thats about $1,94 per liter and you tank in gallons. The main difference I think is that we are taxed to death on gas. I once heard that 80% of the price of our gasoline is tax. Unfortunately this doesnt go to keep highways maintained or invent better alternative energies but into the government hole. All the same we are ahead on driving smaller cars which get better gas milage.
ecofarm said:We should mention that the best way to reduce personal oil consumption is to stop eating meat. Eating meat emits more CO2 than driving a Humvee.
Pound for pound, beef production generates greenhouse gases that contribute more than 13 times as much to global warming as do the gases emitted from producing chicken. For potatoes, the multiplier is 57.
Beef consumption is rising rapidly, both as population increases and as people eat more meat.
Producing the annual beef diet of the average American emits as much greenhouse gas as a car driven more than 1,800 miles...
according to a 2006 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), our diets and, specifically, the meat in them cause more greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, and the like to spew into the atmosphere than either transportation or industry.
Scientific American?
How Meat Contributes to Global Warming: Scientific American
IIRC correctly, the Humvee comment I was refering to was in comparison to driving a regular car.
We need to consider that synthetic fertilizer is basically just oil, the pesticides are pretty much just oil (energy to synthesize) and most of the harvest is via machinery. And stuff that goes with most food: We need to consider transportation of the food to you. Then there are disposal issues for any packaging (which also costs oil). Plus refridgeration in transit and while on the self.
Let's not even talk about the water inefficiency of beef production, it is staggering.
Getting protein from beans requires alot less of all of the above (especially if organic and local). Plus no torture and murder.
Only more government regulation can force Detroit to build electric cars for example. People wont change if their not forced to.
People dont want to consume less because they dont want to change their life style. I dont think that the BP leak will change american energy policy within the next 5 years. Only more government regulation can force Detroit to build electric cars for example. People wont change if their not forced to.
Changes that are forced never stick.
The revolution must be from the ground up, or it will be short-lived. I believe that the next agricultural revolution will be an evolution of mind, not policies dictated from above.
You think you can control people? Good luck.
http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2010/01/12/fuel_efficient_cars_lead_detroit_show/Alternative energy vehicles were the news yesterday at the Detroit auto show...
GM’s Volt can run 40 miles on a charge from a standard home power outlet. After the battery wears down, a 1.4-liter four-cylinder internal combustion engine takes over and generates electricity to power the car. It’s expected to go on sale this fall for about $40,000, before tax credits...
Ford Motor Co.’s market momentum got a lift yesterday by winning both the 2010 North American Car and Truck of the Year awards. Ford’s Fusion Hybrid midsize sedan took top car honors and its versatile Transit Connect compact van snagged truck of the year.
http://www.ota.com/organic/mt/business.htmlU.S. sales of organic food and beverages have grown from $1 billion in 1990 to $24.8 billion in 2009. Sales in 2009 represented 5.1 percent growth over 2008 sales. Experiencing the highest growth in sales during 2009 were organic fruits and vegetables, up 11.4 percent over 2008 sales
Organic food and beverage sales represented approximately 3.7 percent of overall food and beverage sales in 2009. Leading were organic fruits and vegetables, now representing 11.4 percent of all U.S. fruit and vegetable sales.
Organic non-food sales grew 9.1 percent in 2009, to reach $1.8 billion.
Total U.S. organic sales, including food and non-food products, were $26.6 billion in 2009, up 5.3 percent from 2008.
Mass market retailers (mainstream supermarkets, club/warehouse stores, and mass merchandisers) in 2009 sold 54 percent of organic food. Natural retailers were next, selling 38 percent of total organic food sales. In 2008, mass market retailers represented 45 percent of sales, while natural food channels represented 43 percent of sales. Other sales occur via export, the Internet, farmers’ markets/ Community Supported Agriculture, mail order, and boutique and specialty stores.
Certified organic acreage in the United States reached more than 4.8 million acres in 2008, according to updated data posted by USDA. U.S. total organic cropland reached 2,655,382 acres in 2008, while land devoted to organic pasture totaled 2,160,577 acres. California leads with the most certified organic cropland, with over 430,000 acres, largely used for fruit and vegetable production. Other states with the most certified organic cropland include Wisconsin, North Dakota, Minnesota and Montana. Forty-five states also had some certified organic rangeland and pasture in 2008; of those, 13 states had more than 100,000 acres each, reflecting the growth in the U.S. organic dairy sector between 2005 and 2008. Certified organic cropland acreage between 2002 and 2008 averaged 15 percent annual growth. However, it still only represented about 0.7 percent of all U.S. cropland, while certified organic pasture only represented 0.5 percent of all U.S. pasture in 2008. Overall, certified organic cropland and pasture accounted for about 0.6 percent of U.S. total farmland in 2008. Although a small percentage of major U.S. field crops are grown organically, organic carrots represented 25 percent of total U.S. carrot acreage, while organic lettuce represented 8 percent of all lettuce acreage. Fresh produce is still the top-selling organic category in retail sales. Meanwhile, the organic livestock sector has seen growth, with 2.7 percent of U.S. dairy cows and 1.5 percent of layer hens managed under certified organic systems.
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, www.ers.usda.gov/data/organic.
Acreage managed organically in 2008 in the world totaled 35 million hectares farmed by almost 1.4 million producers in 154 countries, according to data from The World of Organic Agriculture 2010. Organic agricultural land area increased in all regions, and was up nearly three million hectares, or nine percent, compared to 2007 data. Of the total area managed organically, 22 million hectares were grassland. In addition, 8.2 million hectares were used for cropland. The regions with the largest area of organically managed land are Oceania (12.1 million hectares in Australia, New Zealand, and surrounding island states), Europe (8.2 million hectares), and Latin America (8.1 million hectares), according to statistics in a chapter by Dr. Helga Willer. The report also recorded 31 million hectares that are organic wild collection areas and land for bee keeping. The majority of this land is in developing countries.
Source: The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics & Emerging Trends 2010.
Meanwhile, according to Organic Monitor estimates, global organic sales reached $50.9 billion in 2008, double the $25 billion recorded in 2003.
People wont change if their not forced to.
People dont want to consume less because they dont want to change their life style. I dont think that the BP leak will change american energy policy within the next 5 years. Only more government regulation can force Detroit to build electric cars for example. People wont change if their not forced to.
frankly I think the Obama administration is going to be beneficial in this. Just like it took Carter to give us the changes of the Reagan era, he could be giving us a Tea Party era.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?