• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hannity, Ingraham slam Cheney for releasing Jan. 6 messages to Meadows

I know I posted the OP just a second ago but does anyone know if Fox News is the Pravda of the Republican party?

Asking for a friend.
 
It sounds like nothing illegal. They broacast the same on their tv shows. Where is a crime? They simply asked could Trump say something to help bring the riot to an end. What shows that Trump had that control? Nothing. That's what democrats are trying to claim but there isn't any evidence of it. In fact the evidence points the other way, that he had not power to stop the rioters who breeched the capital. There is only evidence that the told the rally atendees to "go peacefull and protest peacefully" . So again, no evidence and yet democrats and anti trumper cheney are just on a vendetta. That's it. Scared he will run and win, scared he won't but will help drive voters to get out and vote. Full of personal hatred n just the same way as the Trump Russian Collusion hoax has been revealed.
 
If Ingraham really thought that the rioters were actually an anti-Trump crowd, then why did she want Trump to ask them to leave, knowing full well that the crowd wasn't under Trump's control? That's where the hypocrisy lies. She obviously thought one thing in private (that the rioters were pro-Trump), but was telling her audience something else (that the rioters were anti-Trump). At least, that's how I see it.
 
CaughtInThe said:
View attachment 67364823

Just too perfect.



nypost.com

Hannity, Ingraham slam Cheney for releasing Jan. 6 messages to Meadows

Cheney, the vice chair of the Jan. 6 select committee investigating the riot, read out the messages from Hannity and Ingraham on Monday night.
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...


Whats funny about their crying is i cant imagine there are any normal, honest, educated, objective people that dont already know they are vile POS lying, hypocritical human beings void of integrity as far as media is concerned so its not that this info that further proves that is going to have a real impact
 
Integrityrespec said:
It sounds like nothing illegal. They broacast the same on their tv shows. Where is a crime? They simply asked could Trump say something to help bring the riot to an end. What shows that Trump had that control? Nothing. That's what democrats are trying to claim but there isn't any evidence of it. In fact the evidence points the other way, that he had not power to stop the rioters who breeched the capital. There is only evidence that the told the rally atendees to "go peacefull and protest peacefully" . So again, no evidence and yet democrats and anti trumper cheney are just on a vendetta. That's it. Scared he will run and win, scared he won't but will help drive voters to get out and vote. Full of personal hatred n just the same way as the Trump Russian Collusion hoax has been revealed.
Click to expand...
During his speech on Jan. 6th he also said : "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore,".... Funny thing is, right after that speech the protesters actually went down to the capital and "fought like hell".... What an odd coincidence.....
 
Crakhobarbie said:
During his speech on Jan. 6th he also said : "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore,".... Funny thing is, right after that speech the protesters actually went down to the capital and "fought like hell".... What an odd coincidence.....
Click to expand...
He knew what he was doing.

Then Republican Pravda saw it on TV and tried to get him to call it off.
 
Naturally. The materials show them to be the propagandists we know them to be. Tell Meadows to get Trump to call off his insurrectionists behind the scenes, blame ANTIFA/Democrats and call it a kegger in the open.

Standard Fox/Trumpist behavior.
 
Mr Person said:
Naturally. The materials show them to be the propagandists we know them to be. Tell Meadows to get Trump to call off his insurrectionists behind the scenes, blame ANTIFA/Democrats and call it a kegger in the open.

Standard Fox/Trumpist behavior.
Click to expand...
Yeah. They're disgusting.
 
AGENT J said:
Whats funny about their crying is i cant imagine there are any normal, honest, educated, objective people that dont already know they are vile POS lying, hypocritical human beings void of integrity as far as media is concerned so its not that this info that further proves that is going to have a real impact
Click to expand...
This pretty much sums up the logic of why they are such hypocrites. Now they are blaming Liz Cheney. And, overlooking the whole premise that the felt Trump could bring the rioting to an end if he would only speak out against it.

-- In an interview with Dan Abrams, Bill O'Reilly said of the texts his former colleagues sent, "I wouldn't have done it myself." Hannity was apparently watching and fired off a text to Abrams... (NewsNation)
-- Greg Sergent calls out Fox News hosts for feeding the Big Lie and then being aghast at the terror at the Capitol it caused: "Hannity and Ingraham may not like what the rioters revealed, but they are among its most prominent authors..." (Washington Post)
-- S.E. Cupp: "If these folks aren't the definition of snake oil salesmen, I don't know what is. They've used their influential platforms to sell concocted grievances and false remedies to millions and millions of people, knowing it was all, put simply, made up..." (NY Daily News)
-- Alex Shephard: "Despite their horror, they have spent the intervening year happily spreading doubt and outrage all the same. They knew better; their texts prove it. They just don't care... (New Republic)
-- Zack Beauchamp says the texts are "tangible proof that some of Fox's marquee personalities knowingly lied to their audience about January. The lying began basically immediately, in the direct aftermath of a national tragedy..." (Vox)
-- David Corn "compared the new January 6 texts to Mark Meadows' book." His conclusion: "It's damning..." (Mother Jones)
-- Jake Sherman discloses that he was the person who sent texts to Mark Meadows during the insurrection warning those at the US Capitol were "helpless," as read by Liz Cheney during Monday's hearing... (Twitter)
 
Has anyone on Fox ever read anyone's private emails or texts?
 
I wonder what is going through Meadows' head right now.
 
Integrityrespec said:
It sounds like nothing illegal. They broacast the same on their tv shows. Where is a crime? They simply asked could Trump say something to help bring the riot to an end. What shows that Trump had that control? Nothing. That's what democrats are trying to claim but there isn't any evidence of it. In fact the evidence points the other way, that he had not power to stop the rioters who breeched the capital. There is only evidence that the told the rally atendees to "go peacefull and protest peacefully" . So again, no evidence and yet democrats and anti trumper cheney are just on a vendetta. That's it. Scared he will run and win, scared he won't but will help drive voters to get out and vote. Full of personal hatred n just the same way as the Trump Russian Collusion hoax has been revealed.
Click to expand...
Nope. He also said "go to the Capitol" and "fight like hell", which a bunch of them did. Interesting you leave that part out.
 
reflechissez said:
I get that, but does every new news item about the same topic need its own thread?
Click to expand...
Personally I think there are way too few threads about the attempted insurrection and then Trump Republicans try to push those off with threads about Jussie, a Christmas tree, race, CRT, BLM, Antifa, etc.

It's the Fox News model and it works without much effort.
 
Integrityrespec said:
It sounds like nothing illegal. They broacast the same on their tv shows. Where is a crime? They simply asked could Trump say something to help bring the riot to an end. What shows that Trump had that control? Nothing. That's what democrats are trying to claim but there isn't any evidence of it. In fact the evidence points the other way, that he had not power to stop the rioters who breeched the capital. There is only evidence that the told the rally atendees to "go peacefull and protest peacefully" . So again, no evidence and yet democrats and anti trumper cheney are just on a vendetta. That's it. Scared he will run and win, scared he won't but will help drive voters to get out and vote. Full of personal hatred n just the same way as the Trump Russian Collusion hoax has been revealed.
Click to expand...
Give us all a break: Trump is not criminally responsible in my view for what happened Jan 6, but he is morally responsible for deceiving his followers with his lies about the election, telling them they “wouldn’t have a country” unless they acted aggressively. Jan 6 wouldn’t have happened but for his lies about the 2020 election. You, the republicans who condemned him then but defend him now, and everyone else knows that. Those were no different than his lies about the 2016 popular vote, his birther lies about Obama’s legitimacy, his lies about the 2012 election, etc. Trump has been a crook since his University and Foundation, was a bigot before then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom