- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 24,373
- Reaction score
- 14,951
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
You have never ever been able to point to one thing I have ever said about the Constitution that is wrong. And you sir have proven that you do not even know the basic difference between the Constitution and the nations brith announcement.
Now is your time. Step up to the plate - man up - state your case - show me where I have made a mistake of fact about the Constitution. I certainly am bnot claiming I am ever wrong - but am challenging YOU to show me where I was.
Do it or man up and have the decency to stand down.
Your understanding of rights and your attempt to diminish a right that your beloved party has pissed on for the last 80 years are rather disturbing to any freedom loving patriot
trying to smear a right by claiming dead schoolchildren are "heroes" of the second Amendment is pretty sickening
but like Boo you seem to come here to shower disdain on right wing gun owners without really having an point you want to make concerning the OP
Oh I'd love to see dueling in very limited and specific circumstances brought back. The conditions would be along the lines of political slander and must be approved by the house and senate or it is not legal.As he slaps him with a glove... "I demand satisfaction." :mrgreen:
As he slaps him with a glove... "I demand satisfaction." :mrgreen:
Your understanding of rights and your attempt to diminish a right that your beloved party has pissed on for the last 80 years are rather disturbing to any freedom loving patriot
I do not have to shower disdain upon anyone.
Why are you against memorializing the innocents just like we have done in many other national tragedies such as Columbine and 911?
Oh I'd love to see dueling in very limited and specific circumstances brought back. The conditions would be along the lines of political slander and must be approved by the house and senate or it is not legal.
And bullets. Rock on!Hey man, all you need is love.
Peace.eace
:lamo
.
as has been explained to you many times those memorials were not directed towards an Amendment but rather the tragedy
you would only have a point if 9-11 memorials were dedicated to the heroes of "religious tolerance" or liberal Visa Provisions
So which right aided and abetted the killing of the people at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Ohio and far too many others to list here?
So which right aided and abetted the killing of the people at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Ohio and far too many others to list here?
No right whatsoever. Using firearms for illegal purposes was never a right.
Absolutely, which is why having a gun specifically in commission of a crime versus other weapons is a seperate felony rather than an upgrade to the existing charge.None, there is no right to kill anyone and the killers were not old enough to legally own handguns so their minority took them outside the protection of the second amendment in columbine and Chardon Ohio.
What you fail to understand that possessing a gun for the purpose of committing a crime is ILLEGAL as well and thus the second amendment has absolutely no relevance to your ranting
...What you fail to understand that possessing a gun for the purpose of committing a crime is ILLEGAL...
Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
Well Mr. Pro-Second amendment. The answer is simple, this is a ridiculous hypothetical with no bearing on reality and even countries with ZERO TOLERANCE gun policies have gun crime.Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
MOre oozing idiocy in that post. There is no right to possess crack cocaine in this country yet its all over the place
You engage in the stupidity of assuming if guns were banned-or at least not protected, killers wouldn't get them...
I'll sure all the criminals are aware of this. And yet, it doesn't stop them.
it would be a lot more difficult.
Well Mr. Pro-Second amendment. The answer is simple, this is a ridiculous hypothetical with no bearing on reality and even countries with ZERO TOLERANCE gun policies have gun crime.
Absolutely, which is why having a gun specifically in commission of a crime versus other weapons is a seperate felony rather than an upgrade to the existing charge.
Only for the law abiding which of course is what those run the party that haymarket works for want
I'm sorry but that doesn't hold. We can't even keep a 150# Mexican from crossing the border, what makes you think we can stop a 150# Mexican with a gun?Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?