- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Think Rubby ridge. Or any number of individuals agaisnt the government. Out numbered and overrun.
.
I don't want to derail the discussion, but it is perfectly legal to carry in a liquor store in FLorida. The law you state is for establishments that sell liquor for Consumption on the Premises. You state may be different. You might want to check.
Agree with all of your other statements however.
Ruby Ridge is a bad example. It took place out in the woods. The government took 360 degree attack position on the cabin. An urban environment the government would have 360 degree threat environment. Ruby ridge also featured small numbers of government agencies. I never said people wouldn't die. But the occupational force would loose many troops, morale would drop as sniper fire, bombs, and all kinds of demoralizing attacks occured. Vietnam? Iraq? The invasion of these kinds of places cannot be done in full scale. The bigger the occupationa force is...the bigger the target becomes. You don't have to kill every soldier to kill an army. You can kill the morale and a few politicians and that will end an occupation fast.
Great if this works and great if men are shown how NOT to use a gun....How to self defend without killing others..The Conservatives here must remember that its 2012 not 1612...0r 1912..I prefer more Gun education than more Gun control.
Is there an issue here? The question is what I think gun control should be. I stated that early on and merely follow the discussion as it goes.
But I have no disdain for gun owners, responsible gun owners. I have disdain for the mythology, the magical almost religious reverence some hold towards guns. There is a difference.
:coffeepap
Great if this works and great if men are shown how NOT to use a gun....How to self defend without killing others..The Conservatives here must remember that its 2012 not 1612...0r 1912..
People are people TD, and we die just as easily today as any other time period. I don't know how people don't get that.that's a really stupid comment. self defense is as important today as it was 100 years ago.
Great if this works and great if men are shown how NOT to use a gun....How to self defend without killing others..The Conservatives here must remember that its 2012 not 1612...0r 1912..
People are people TD, and we die just as easily today as any other time period. I don't know how people don't get that.
that's a really stupid comment. self defense is as important today as it was 100 years ago.
(CNN) -- A fired employee of Episcopal High School in Jacksonville, Florida, returned to the school Tuesday, shot and killed the headmistress and then killed himself, authorities said.
The gunman, who was terminated earlier in the day and carried an assault rifle in a guitar case, went to the office of Headmistress Dale Regan, Undersheriff Dwain Senterfitt with the Jackonsville Sheriff's Office told reporters.
Relevance? I can go online and find defensive uses to probably about a 24:1 ratio against your "two shot in Florida" example with minimal effort. Do learn more about firearms and our RIGHTS before you opine.Yeah self defence is important but how abt this scenario? - latest news
2 adults dead in Florida high school shooting - CNN.com
I don't think anyone here believes it's reality. We were discussing the general subject and my brain produced that movie title as an obvious relation even if it is fiction. Had we been discussing aliens any number of movies would have made the list from Close Encounters to AVP, depending on the details of our discussion.But I don't pretend it represents reality, as some here are.
so you have disdain for a mainly fictional attitude that is mostly a nonexistent phenomenon of leftwing creative thinking
Relevance? I can go online and find defensive uses to probably about a 24:1 ratio against your "two shot in Florida" example with minimal effort. Do learn more about firearms and our RIGHTS before you opine.
Do you really think no one would be able to get such in that situation? Our army would just fall aside, with no one having access or getting any of those weapons?
Seriously, having your small arms is meaningless. I'm just saying, the mythology doesn't add up any more.
It's not a statement of rights at all.I'm sure that's true, but why has there not therefore been a constitutional amendment? Either the constitution is the ultimate statement of rights or it isn't, surely.
What are you talking about? "be able to get such in that situation?" ? And what about the military falling aside? There is no doubt our military kicks ass, but in the unlikely event something incredibly bad happens, do you really think civilians with weapons will be worthless and meaningless? Really? That seems ridiculous.
Yeah self defence is important but how abt this scenario? - latest news
2 adults dead in Florida high school shooting - CNN.com
Yeah self defence is important but how abt this scenario? - latest news
2 adults dead in Florida high school shooting - CNN.com
I'd shoot him....if we could only get rid of gun-free zones.
and then you'd be guilty of murder.
shooting a killer is not murder
try again
and then you'd be guilty of murder.
if you hunt a murderer down, and shoot him in the head, you too are now a murderer.
only police have the right & authority to apprehend criminal suspects.
the ONLY legal way one can apprehend a criminal suspect, is if you yourself actually witness the crime taking place.
then you can detain him..and even kill him if its necessary to save lives.
Uh that's what I thin he was saying
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?