• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guns are the problem...

Gun ownership a dozen create crime no matter how much you want to lie and say that it does sorry.
Of course gun ownership doesn’t create crime. But the presence of guns make crime more deadly. Duh.
 
Of course gun ownership doesn’t create crime.
Glad you admit it
But the presence of guns make crime more deadly.
Or less deadly depending on who has one. Somebody is far less likely to try and threaten a person when there is a .357 being fired at them. DUH
 
Glad you admit it

Or less deadly depending on who has one. Somebody is far less likely to try and threaten a person when there is a .357 being fired at them. DUH
Guns are one factor in why violent crime turns deadly so often in the US as compared to other, similar countries.
 
Guns are one factor in why violent crime turns deadly so often in the US as compared to other, similar countries.
Guns for these crimes are just a means to an end. Someone that wants to kill is going to kill regardless of means. So no.
 
Guns for these crimes are just a means to an end. Someone that wants to kill is going to kill regardless of means. So no.
There are relatively few drive by longings. Again, guns are one factor in this. That’s all.
 
There are relatively few drive by longings.
If you have trouble with drive-by shootings quit completely organizing the problem to focus on everyone that's not involved and focus on the issue. It's not guns. For every drive-by shooting I bet there's a million people that own guns that don't do that.
Again, guns are one factor in this.
It's not a factor it's a means to an end like any other weapon or tool for that matter. They're never a factor guns do not possess psychic abilities to tell people to commit crimes. Someone wants to commit crimes so they get a gun to achieve their ends
That’s all.
A ridiculous argument is all? No wonder you people never make any headway. Try quit pretending that guns are a factor and think rationally.
 
Guns don't kill people
But they sure help !

So do knives, motor vehicles, various items that can be used as bludgeons.

What is your point?
 
If you have trouble with drive-by shootings quit completely organizing the problem to focus on everyone that's not involved and focus on the issue. It's not guns. For every drive-by shooting I bet there's a million people that own guns that don't do that.

It's not a factor it's a means to an end like any other weapon or tool for that matter. They're never a factor guns do not possess psychic abilities to tell people to commit crimes. Someone wants to commit crimes so they get a gun to achieve their ends

A ridiculous argument is all? No wonder you people never make any headway. Try quit pretending that guns are a factor and think rationally.
Just this: Again, the US has a relatively high homicide rate and one can attribute that to poverty, decline of civic morality or of the family structure, drug trafficking and use, etc. But all I am saying is that one factor to be considered are the presence and/or easily of guns. Do you really think that any objective analysis would not mention that?
 
Just this: Again, the US has a relatively high homicide rate and one can attribute that to poverty, decline of civic morality or of the family structure, drug trafficking and use, etc. But all I am saying is that one factor to be considered are the presence and/or easily of guns. Do you really think that any objective analysis would not mention that?

That factor seems to not correlate very well with the homicide rate.
 
Just this: Again, the US has a relatively high homicide rate
How is this related?
and one can attribute that to poverty,
Incorrectly crime causes poverty not the other way around and think about it even the poorest here are the top 1% of earners in the world
decline of civic morality or of the family structure, drug trafficking and use, etc. But all I am saying is that one factor to be considered are the presence and/or easily of guns.
Guns are far more often involved in preventing or stopping victimization. So you want more crime are you completely unaware of reality.
Do you really think that any objective analysis would not mention that?
An objective analysis wouldn't negate it because if you gather up all the murders and all the suicides and then multiply them by 30 that's how many times as citizen uses a gun to defend themselves.
 
Just this: Again, the US has a relatively high homicide rate and one can attribute that to poverty, decline of civic morality or of the family structure, drug trafficking and use, etc. But all I am saying is that one factor to be considered are the presence and/or easily of guns. Do you really think that any objective analysis would not mention that?

Guns don't cause crime, they do however make the consequences of it far more severe.
 
Guns don't cause crime, they do however make the consequences of it far more severe.
But prevent the consequences far more often.
This is the side of the equation you ignore and just because you ignore it doesn't mean it disappears.
 
But prevent the consequences far more often.
This is the side of the equation you ignore and just because you ignore it doesn't mean it disappears.

It's like those who make the quantitative claim that guns are a detriment to society while ignoring the benefits- many of which aren't quantifiable.
 
It's like those who make the quantitative claim that guns are a detriment to society while ignoring the benefits- many of which aren't quantifiable.
It's worse than that they don't even acknowledge the side of it it's like it's in a different dimension
 
But prevent the consequences far more often.
This is the side of the equation you ignore and just because you ignore it doesn't mean it disappears.

No, just a lie gun owners spread to justify their guns.
 
S
How is this related?

Incorrectly crime causes poverty not the other way around and think about it even the poorest here are the top 1% of earners in the world

Guns are far more often involved in preventing or stopping victimization. So you want more crime are you completely unaware of reality.

An objective analysis wouldn't negate it because if you gather up all the murders and all the suicides and then multiply them by 30 that's how many times as citizen uses a gun to defend themselves.
So explain which factors in other countries comparable to the US cause them to have lower homicide rates.
 
S

So explain which factors in other countries comparable to the US cause them to have lower homicide rates.

The factor that they are cherry picked for comparison. If the "It’s the guns!" theory held up, we wouldn't see the disparity we see among those countries you claim are comparable.
 
At last, some common sense.

Guns can also make the consequences of self defense more severe. So that's the benefit that isn't being addressed.
 
Back
Top Bottom