• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

gun free theaters

Security theater IN a theater?
 

There is a gun in the movies every time I go. I'm not concerned about a mass shooter. I'm more worried about walking out to the car. You don't need a gun to be an asshole mugger.
 

Well I have a new holster on order that will fit my gun with a tactical light on and next pay check I'm getting a laser grip installed. That should fix any problems hitting a mass shooter in the dark
 

Thank your lucky stars you don't have a border connected to the 3rd world as the US does.
We have more drugs with a street value exceeding Australias annual GDP crossing those borders into the US every day. With those drugs comes weapons.

That and a Left wing government will eventually bring the guns home....for the criminals that is anyway
 

And if they try, fart, make a strange face and run away.
 

Gainesville Georgia, about 1/2 hour south of here, is a sanctuary city. luckily they don't come up here to the mountains.
 
Gainesville Georgia, about 1/2 hour south of here, is a sanctuary city. luckily they don't come up here to the mountains.

The North Georgia Mountains are beautiful. Love that area. Been to Helen, Blairsville and all around that area quite a bit.
Also very familiar with Lake Lanier.
I had no idea Gainesville had become a sanctuary city.

Did you know that it is hard to find English speaking people in Miami Florida?

The United States I was born into is GONE.
And I don't know what the hell it's becoming, but it looks bad.
 

See, people like those who believe it's a good idea to shoot someone else for talking at the movies is EXACTLY the reason I carry.
 
Well I have a new holster on order that will fit my gun with a tactical light on and next pay check I'm getting a laser grip installed. That should fix any problems hitting a mass shooter in the dark

including the people who are scattering in every direction in the dark between you and the shooter? how about the ones behind him? i'm a great shot, and even i couldn't make you a guarantee that there wouldn't be a risk of someone else catching a stray bullet, especially if another person was also shooting at the dude. what if that person thought that i was also a shooter? too many variables there. metal detectors and trained security guards seem to be the better option.
 
See, people like those who believe it's a good idea to shoot someone else for talking at the movies is EXACTLY the reason I carry.

perhaps you deserve it like I described?
 

I think that's so very appropriate. If a business is going to ban guns, they should have to take reasonable precautions to make sure there are no guns.
 
I think that's so very appropriate. If a business is going to ban guns, they should have to take reasonable precautions to make sure there are no guns.

Agreed. Over the years in these sort of discussions there are those who like to brag how that no guns sign does to stop them and they carry anyway disregarding the rules of the establishment. So enforcement is a solid idea.
 
Agreed. Over the years in these sort of discussions there are those who like to brag how that no guns sign does to stop them and they carry anyway disregarding the rules of the establishment. So enforcement is a solid idea.

I don't carry into my gun free work place. They actually check for firearms. The only legitimate "gun free sign" is backed up by enforcement and probably, ironically, guys with guns.
 

Which will never happen because it is far cheaper to just make your customers lambs for slaughter and make a token gesture like the crap described above. Besides. I think having SOMEONE shooting back at the shooter is better than NOBODY.
 

Considering the many millions of movies shown in US theaters since 1979 that would not be cost effectuve to stop less than 20 such incidents (including some outside of the theater property) nationwide.

https://www.thewrap.com/a-history-o...ors-gang-showdown-to-2015s-lafayette-tragedy/

Perhaos you can provide us with the cost (to date) of lawsuit settlements paid by those theaters so we can judge for ourselves whether more security would indeed be cost effective.
 
I think that's so very appropriate. If a business is going to ban guns, they should have to take reasonable precautions to make sure there are no guns.

That, IMHO, is the point of this thread - those "purse examining" precautions did not pass the reasonable test since they let an armed person enter.
 
Metal detectors will be a disaster for business. Private guards do not have immunity from civil damages like government agents do, and people carry so many metal things that are innocent, coins, pocket knives, keys, belt buckles, steel toe shoes many people have had medical procedures like pinned ankles which will set off detectors, in a private function like a theater open to the general public, metal detectors will cost more business then liability they will prevent.

Hence why they are only used for government facilities and closed private facilities. I can't think of any private facility open to the general public that uses them
 

And honestly...if liability is the concern...how is the movie theatre liable for the actions of a member of the public using their right?
 
Which will never happen because it is far cheaper to just make your customers lambs for slaughter and make a token gesture like the crap described above. Besides. I think having SOMEONE shooting back at the shooter is better than NOBODY.

metal detectors at the entrance and a security guard would be far better than a wild west shootout with the lights off in a crowd of people. anyone who has experience with guns knows that, too, i'd guess, even if they won't admit it. if i was consulting with a movie theater chain, i would definitely advise against allowing people to carry into theaters for the reasons that i've already outlined.
 
Meh, about the time I feel the need to carry into a movie theater, I'll just stop going.
 

people manage to get on planes ok. i doubt many of them want to be shot in a theater either by the shooter or by an amped up untrained person firing at a moving target in the dark, either. and that dude is likely to be mistaken for a second shooter. what happens when a third armed person starts trying to take him down, and then he mistakes person number three for shooter number two?

Hence why they are only used for government facilities and closed private facilities. I can't think of any private facility open to the general public that uses them

liability? you're telling me the liability is worse for a theater security guard than for issuing an open invitation for everyone to come in fully armed? i doubt it, man. i really doubt it.
 

I just dropped in, so maybe I'm misunderstanding...who issues an "open invitation" other than our constitution? I rather think that if a business elects to remove MY right to defend myself, that business should then be RESPONSIBLE for my safety.

Every person I know who owns a gun PRAYS they will never have to use it on another human being . . . If not for the trauma of taking a life, then for the fear of making a mistake or injuring/killing an innocent as well as the criminal and civil sideshow almost sure to take place.
 
I just dropped in, so maybe I'm misunderstanding...who issues an "open invitation" other than our constitution? I rather think that if a business elects to remove MY right to defend myself, that business should then be RESPONSIBLE for my safety.

which is exactly what i proposed earlier in the thread.


a shootout involving untrained individuals in a dark room with high crowd density is a bad idea. there are better options, which i have already explained multiple times. i am a great shot, probably one of the better target shooters on this site, and i wouldn't trust myself to hit a moving target (while under fire) (in the dark) (unprepared,) especially with a handgun. and what about the dude who thinks i'm shooter number two? and what about me turning suddenly to fire back at the guy who i mistake for shooter two?

metal detectors and trained security seems a much better option for a movie theater.
 

Everyone* should know that the security and metal detectors won't happen. So in the mean time I would rather risk the "Wild West" (that never happens btw), than an unarmed theatre filled with defenseless sheep for slaughter.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…