I refer to the number of guns in private hands in the US, which makes cops jobs more dangerous, and civilians-police encounters potentially more dangerous as well. I was nearly shot by plainclothes cops who mistook me for a hijacker and assumed I was armed.
So you want gun control for no good reason other than your feelings?
Police are far from the most dangerous job.
Not what I said. I said their jobs are made more dangerous due to the number of guns around. As to my feelings, almost being shot by cops who understandably assumed I was armed was indeed a downer.
Did they not understand the danger
It's kind of like telling me you got nine holes in one at a golf course pictures or it didn't happen.
Officers might have pointed guns at him. That happened to me once
First time I ever got pulled over as a driver I panicked looking for my insurance and license. I suppose I almost got shot too. The officer saw his young I was and explained when you do that sort of thing police didn't know what you're doing.
Do you want the story?
Nobody cares about how you think you were almost shot whatever that means I don't know how you can read the minds of other people.
I didn’t read their minds. The cops told me they assumed I was armed, that’s why three of them pointed guns at me. When I asked why they didn’t show their badges, one said that last time he did that it was almost shot out of his hand.
I don’t want to take away the Constitution, just believe in the way it was interpreted before the recent decision by the Supreme Court. The poorly written Second Amendment can and has been interpreted as both applying to militias or to individuals’ rights to bear arms.
The interpretation of the 2A has never changed since it was first addressed by SCOTUS in 1858. It was ALWAYS been an individual right.
If it were written differently or punctuated differently. Put “and” or “thus” between the clauses and one has two different meanings. And of course, there has been plenty of gun control — even endorsed by the NRA back in the day — in our history.
So they didn't almost shoot you they just pointed guns at you.
No I really don't believe you.
Yes you do.
It was interpreted the same way all the way back to 1795 you mean you want to return to the ku Klux Klan interpretation where you don't really have any rights at all.
It wasn't poorly written. It always applied to individuals the only time it was an interpreted wrongly to only apply to malicious was when the Court ruled and favor the ku Klux Klan so that's what you're supporting. You have the same view of Rights that the KKK has can I call you Grand dragon?
The second amendment was only quarterly worded in your opinion because you want to suspend rights it was written to thwart you.
Yeah what does he think of Militia is made up of?
They always try and pretend this militia is an entity onto itself it is the people.