BCR
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2010
- Messages
- 598
- Reaction score
- 178
- Location
- Heart of Dixie
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Muslims can build an Islamic center and mosque near ground zero. New York says the building at the site of the proposed center is not historic and can be torn down.
Can't say I am really surprised by the vote. It seems like emotional people are reacting to something that they disagree with, but was legally done right.
legal, yes. but i hate it.
Welcome to America. People have the right to piss you off.
legal, yes. but i hate it.
Still don't see a reason to be upset, people should be able to distinguish that the people building this Mosque are peaceful Muslims while the ones who destroyed the twin towers were extremists.
I don't see what the big deal is about it. Just another ****ing church. Big whoop.
I'm betting people didn't protest any churches being built near the OK city bombing area even though McVeigh was christian
McVeigh didn't have thousands of his supporters jump out unto the streets screaming and chanting 'death to America' either. He also didn't carry his act in the name of Christianity. He was a pro-gun anti-government nut who was pissed about what happened to other pro-gun anti-government nuts in Waco Texas. It's harder to stop somebody from building a gun shop in Oklahoma than it is to stop them from building a church.
Welcome to America. People have the right to piss you off.
I am sure a lot of people hate it. I hate the fact my neighbors have loud sex at 3 in the morning, but I cannot legally force them do to anything. It is the same in this case, everything was done by the book.
very poor analogy.
A unanimous vote, too, we might add. Where next will Sarah Palin choose to demonstrate her irrelevance? (snicker chortle guffaw)
Its fun pissing on the victim's families of 9.11 isn't it Catz?
There are plenty of questions to ask. Like where this money is coming from. This imam has ties to terrorists groups like Hamas. If he is getting his money from there this should never happen.
Im still waiting for the legal evidence that allows blocking said construction. So far all I've been hearing from the statists are nothing but emotion. They could easily prevent the construction if they can prove owner is an illegal alien and/or the land was obtained illegally but of course thats too hard.
Nice assertion.
I assume you can provide evidence to prove it along with the funds of the building?
What evidence do you want? He is refusing to say where the money is coming from and its already proven his organization does not have the funds to do so on their own.
So then no evidence?
Noted.
What part of he is refusing to say where the money is coming from don't you understand?
Don't make such ridiculous assertions without having anything to back it up next time.
Makes you look stupid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?