Governor news - Ohio and Tennessee

[MamboDervish]

That is incorrect. I have moved no goalposts.

Bullshit. You certainly did. You went from "... every progressive" to "Every progressive who supports outlawing the AR-15 brand name, or who supports outlawing pistol grips and flash suppressors, ... "
You moved the goal posts right into the next ****ing county.

I charge and convict every progressive in existence of maliciously violating the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.

Like I said, your own fantasy world, .... now even reversing your own goalpost move now.

No. I realize that progressives want to whitewash history just like their hero Stalin did, but I will not participate in such a coverup.

As if more proof of your fantasy was required. Have you been guzzling the water in Flint again?


(I slay me!)

 

[Toggle Almendro]

Bullshit. You certainly did. You went from "... every progressive" to "Every progressive who supports outlawing the AR-15 brand name, or who supports outlawing pistol grips and flash suppressors, ... "
You moved the goal posts right into the next ****ing county.

I believe that all progressives support such atrocities. Do you have any evidence that there are progressives who do not support such atrocities?

Like I said, your own fantasy world, .... now even reversing your own goalpost move now.

No such goalpost move. And no fantasy world either.

As if more proof of your fantasy was required. Have you been guzzling the water in Flint again?

I realize that the left finds reality inconvenient. That’s why their hero Stalin always kept whitewashing history. But no. Reality is not fantasy.

I have never been to Flint. It is my understanding that there are progressives there.

 

[Pyrite]

Post #40


Your non-expert opinion re the Constitution is interesting.

That is doubly incorrect. I am an expert. And I stated facts.

Additionally, if you are trying to work your way towards committing an appeal to authority, note that appeals to authority are logical fallacies.

Post the bona fides that lead you to believe - and would convince a cyberspace onlooker - that you are indeed an "expert" re the U.S. Constitution.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

Post the bona fides that lead you to believe - and would convince a cyberspace onlooker - that you are indeed an "expert" re the U.S. Constitution.

I know what I’m talking about, and I provide cites when reasonably requested.

Got anything to challenge any of the facts that I posted?

 

[Loulit01]

In recent years, the Republicans have been the party that looks out for the best interests of the average voter.

That is why average voters have been voting for Republicans recently.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

Progressives like to deny reality, but the voters see through all the lies and elect Republicans.

 

[Pyrite]

I know what I’m talking about, and I provide cites when reasonably requested.

Got anything to challenge any of the facts that I posted?

You're a self-described "expert" re the Constitution but have nothing to substantiate this statement.

What you post here is merely your layman's opinion.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

You're a self-described "expert" re the Constitution but have nothing to substantiate this statement.

That is incorrect. I have the fact that I know what I’m talking about and can back up what I say.

What you post here is merely your layman's opinion.

Wrong again. I posted facts. That is why you are avoiding addressing the substance of my posts.

 

[Pyrite]

That is incorrect. I have the fact that I know what I’m talking about and can back up what I say.

LOL! So, this self-belief in one's knowledge and credibility confers on one the title of "expert" re the Constitution.

I figured as much.

Wrong again. I posted facts. That is why you are avoiding addressing the substance of my posts.

And, once again, I point out that your posts reflect nothing save your opinions.

 

[Toggle Almendro]

LOL! So, this self-belief in one's knowledge and credibility confers on one the title of "expert" re the Constitution.
I figured as much.

One has to actually know what they are talking about, as I do. And actually be able to back up what they say, like I do.

And, once again, I point out that your posts reflect nothing save your opinions.

Wrong again. I posted facts. That is why you are avoiding addressing the substance of my posts.

 

[Callen]

Why, if you don't mind?

I just don't think his know it all mouthy ways and slickness will play well to blue collar workers and farmers in rural Ohio. Depends too on what comes out of DOGE and of course a Trump endorsement. I heard the very well liked Ohio AG is also going to run.

 

[gbg3]

ANY person who becomes the Republican nominee will win. Ohio is now a solidly-red state.

Yes, I agree that's quite likely. I guess the question becomes would Vivek win the nomination? I certainly think he'd have a good chance, but we'll see who all decides to enter the race.

 

[gbg3]

Progressives aspire to be like Stalin and whitewash history.

Voters see through the lies and elect Republicans.


For what it's worth, here is a helpful roadmap of the near future:

2025: President Donald Trump <<<--- YOU ARE HERE
2026: President Donald Trump
2027: President Donald Trump
2028: President Donald Trump
2029: President JD Vance
2030: President JD Vance
2031: President JD Vance
2032: President JD Vance
2033: President JD Vance
2034: President JD Vance
2035: President JD Vance
2036: President JD Vance


The Democrats might have a shot at the White House in 2037, but only if they purge the whacky leftists from their party and move back to the center.

I sure hope your helpful roadmap comes to be!

 

[gbg3]

So when maliciously violating people's civil liberties for no reason gets the left booted out of power, the left's backup plan is name-calling?

A similar thought crossed my mind. I guess when the left loses big chunks of the working class, that big chunk is suddenly labeled as "well below average". That ought to make the working class want to run right back to the Dem party!

 

[gbg3]

Buyer's remorse on your part?

LOL

 

[T25]

can't imagine Vivek succeeding.

I think Vivek is a virtual lock.

Vivek Ramaswamy chances of winning GOP primary in Ohio governor race: poll

A new poll showed Ramaswamy with an early lead in the gubernatorial race.

www.newsweek.com

 

[Callen]

I think Vivek is a virtual lock.

Vivek Ramaswamy chances of winning GOP primary in Ohio governor race: poll

A new poll showed Ramaswamy with an early lead in the gubernatorial race.

www.newsweek.com

Apparently so.........I must say I am surprised. I don't know anything about his opponent but Vivek must be charming them big time...he is a charmer that I give him.