Muddy Creek
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 699
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
so you believe legal gun ownership should be subsidized by the state?
The governor also was planning to sign a bill reviving user fees for gun purchasers needing background checks. Colorado charged $10 background-check fees more than a decade ago, but the fees were dropped. The Colorado Bureau of Investigation currently picks up the tab checking prospective gun owners.
Auto companies? Auto deaths and injuries far exceed those from guns. Obama must mandate insurance.
I should have expected that you would see no difference between a state sales tax on a TV (or any other purchase, including a gun) and a specific targetted fee charged for a BG check. Why not do BG checks for buying knives, hammers and baseball bats?
The governor also was planning to sign a bill reviving user fees for gun purchasers needing background checks. Colorado charged $10 background-check fees more than a decade ago, but the fees were dropped. The Colorado Bureau of Investigation currently picks up the tab checking prospective gun owners.
I believe the sale of a product from a corporation that causes more injuries and deaths in this nation should be taxed.....and that the monies can used to pay for those without insurance to be treated.
It's a user fee. Why should NON gun owners be required to subsidize gun background checks?
em ok...is that a no then? my point was I'm ok with buyers financing the background checks so the state doesn't have too.
Read more @: Gov. John Hickenlooper To Sign Gun Control Measures Wednesday
Seems like a good law to me and a common sense law, but i know im gonna get attacked for saying that from the right. Oh well
background checks are fine by me depending on the actual details
the mag/clip/ammo limits are stupid, a waste of time and just for show.
large clips/mags/ammo will still be available to criminals because they dont care about the laws. Clips.mags are easily made.
Dred Scott - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe United States Supreme Court decided 7–2 against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott's temporary residence outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, which the court ruled unconstitutional as it would improperly deprive Scott's owner of his legal property.
You do realize the USSC ruled that governments have the right to regulate firearms...
Here's the "tax" you want to scream about.
It's a user fee. Why should NON gun owners be required to subsidize gun background checks?
Which ups the charges against criminals caught using them and maybe puts them behind bars for a lot longer.
Why should non-parents of school age children be required to subsidize public schools?
we have an accord!
like i said a waste of times just up or actually enforce the laws punishing CRIMINALS with guns or who use guns while commiting a crime which makes it a felony :shrug:
its a wast of time and logic and hinders non-criminals
No, it's a good law to limit the magazine rounds.
Because and educated citizenry makes our economy strong.
No, it's a good law to limit the magazine rounds.
No, it's a good law to limit the magazine rounds.
How so? There are no guns being confiscated, no mention of stopping the sale of guns for hunters, target shooters and those in marksman competition.
So how is that militia treating you? Oh, you are not in one? Then you don't have a right to a gun along a strict translation. It is a good idea not to torpedo your own arguments like you just did.
Jerry can explain better than I, but EVERYONE is part of the millitia. Hence EVERYONE can be armed. How do you think you can be drafted.
Actually she cannot be drafted. The draft only covers those that are male between the ages of 18 and 46. Unless they changed it and I didn't know about it?
Here's the "tax" you want to scream about.
It's a user fee. Why should NON gun owners be required to subsidize gun background checks?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?