• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP trying to do a retread to Biden of what they did to Hillary

Comer bragged about how their investigations are lowering Biden's poll numbers just like they did in Hillary's case. It seems that there is no need to have facts, just investigations are enough to say where there is smoke there has to be fire to the American people. Now it is about supposed papers showing Biden in a bad light and the GOP is trying to get them from the DOJ. These papers came from Ukraine when it was controlled by Putin and were made available by Guiliani, certainly a reliable source. Now Grassley from Iowa has stepped in complaining about the GOP's failure to get these papers. He admitted that the GOP was not interested in the accuracy of the information. Se link above. It is clar that this is not about finding the truth, but the GOP using it as ammo in their "investigations" to help trump back into the White House.
Beware of anything you read with a byline like "Story by (name here)".
It's equivalent to "Opinion" or "Analysis".
It ain't straight news reporting.
If it was it would include reports that the FBI's CHS at the center of this particular story was considered "trusted".

Wanna bet that before long it'll be confirmed that Joe is a blackmail target for several Countries because of the sordid history of the Biden Crime Family?
 
Biden is only a disaster to republicans because he is doing a better job than most expected, including me.
I never would have predicted he’d be this good. So the two or three posters on this site who supported him even at the start of the Democratic primary, like @Redress, were clearly tapping into something I wasn’t.
 
Beware of anything you read with a byline like "Story by (name here)".
It's equivalent to "Opinion" or "Analysis".
It ain't straight news reporting.
If it was it would include reports that the FBI's CHS at the center of this particular story was considered "trusted".

Wanna bet that before long it'll be confirmed that Joe is a blackmail target for several Countries because of the sordid history of the Biden Crime Family?
What is the date of this “before long,” and what are the terms of this bet?
 
What is the date of this “before long,” and what are the terms of this bet?
Some of us can see it already. Then again, others of us don't read enough to know it.
Which are you?
 
Comey put trump in the White House. But that’s only if you factor in the linear movement of time.
Nonsense.

Trump put himself in the WH. Comey kept Hillary in the race by telling the DOJ AG what to do (not prosecute) after he gave her a pass for her crimes.
 
Nonsense.

Trump put himself in the WH. Comey kept Hillary in the race by telling the DOJ AG what to do (not prosecute) after he gave her a pass for her crimes.

The Comey letter destroyed her approval ratings two weeks before election, and the FBI kept its investigation into the trump campaign secret while their investigation of Clinton was a public affair for the entirety of the campaign cycle.

But again, that’s only if you factor in the linear direction of time. If you were to replace 2016 with 2017, then yes, you might have an argument that the FBI was trying to deliver the election to Clinton.

Unfortunately for your position, 2017 came after 2016 (as years tend to do) so your argument fails.
 
Last edited:
The Comey letter destroyed her approval ratings two weeks before election, and the FBI kept its investigation into the trump campaign secret while their investigation of Clinton was a public affair for the entirety of the campaign cycle.

But again, that’s only if you factor in the linear direction of time. If you were to replace 2016 with 2017, then yes, you might have an argument that the FBI was trying to deliver the election to Clinton.

Unfortunately for your position, 2017 came after 2016 (as years tend to do) so your argument fails.
It's his lie and he can tell it any way he wishes. Comey helped sink clinton plain and simple.
 
Beware of anything you read with a byline like "Story by (name here)".
It's equivalent to "Opinion" or "Analysis".
It ain't straight news reporting.
If it was it would include reports that the FBI's CHS at the center of this particular story was considered "trusted".

Wanna bet that before long it'll be confirmed that Joe is a blackmail target for several Countries because of the sordid history of the Biden Crime Family?
Yeah, I'll take that bet. You are just blowing smoke and MSU.
 
Please answer my question.
Is it secret and you can't divulge the info? I do enjoy a mystery.
Yeah, I'll take that bet. You are just blowing smoke and MSU.

heh heh.
You answered what I asked.

Here's the thing.
If you hadn't self-censored the news through your selection of sources you'd already be aware of what's out there.
What's already out there would have sunk anyone who wasn't protected by Media and Federal corruption.
Those are the factors that are prolonging exposure of the Biden Crime Family to some people.
That makes it difficult to give them a date since they show no signs they ever intend to admit it.
It's that 3rd step in my sig that your partisanship is preventing.
But if you see more chatter from your side about Joe's competence you'll know everything is getting too deep for them to excuse.

Try this ... what's the most damning thing about the Biden clan you've learned from your news sources?
 
heh heh.
You answered what I asked.

Here's the thing.
If you hadn't self-censored the news through your selection of sources you'd already be aware of what's out there.
What's already out there would have sunk anyone who wasn't protected by Media and Federal corruption.
Those are the factors that are prolonging exposure of the Biden Crime Family to some people.
That makes it difficult to give them a date since they show no signs they ever intend to admit it.
It's that 3rd step in my sig that your partisanship is preventing.
But if you see more chatter from your side about Joe's competence you'll know everything is getting too deep for them to excuse.

Try this ... what's the most damning thing about the Biden clan you've learned from your news sources?
So when is this alleged 'media and federal protection' going to be dropped in favor of exposing the Biden crime family? You said it would happen soon. Who's going to court and when? C'mon, cough it up!

Next, you'll be telling us that the fact that no charges are ever filed is proof of the guilt of the Biden crime family. I guess I must be part of the Biden crime family because I've never had charges filed against me, either.
 
So when is this alleged 'media and federal protection' going to be dropped in favor of exposing the Biden crime family? You said it would happen soon. Who's going to court and when? C'mon, cough it up!

Next, you'll be telling us that the fact that no charges are ever filed is proof of the guilt of the Biden crime family. I guess I must be part of the Biden crime family because I've never had charges filed against me, either.

Wait. Am...I...a part of the Biden Crime Family? :oops:
 
heh heh.
You answered what I asked.

Here's the thing.
If you hadn't self-censored the news through your selection of sources you'd already be aware of what's out there.
What's already out there would have sunk anyone who wasn't protected by Media and Federal corruption.
Those are the factors that are prolonging exposure of the Biden Crime Family to some people.
That makes it difficult to give them a date since they show no signs they ever intend to admit it.
It's that 3rd step in my sig that your partisanship is preventing.
But if you see more chatter from your side about Joe's competence you'll know everything is getting too deep for them to excuse.

Try this ... what's the most damning thing about the Biden clan you've learned from your news sources?
The biden crime family have been convicted of what? Let's take a step back, what has the biden crime family been charged with? Who is in this crime family? Is it like the Gambino's?
 
So when is this alleged 'media and federal protection' going to be dropped in favor of exposing the Biden crime family? You said it would happen soon. Who's going to court and when? C'mon, cough it up!

Next, you'll be telling us that the fact that no charges are ever filed is proof of the guilt of the Biden crime family. I guess I must be part of the Biden crime family because I've never had charges filed against me, either.
The biden crime family have been convicted of what? Let's take a step back, what has the biden crime family been charged with? Who is in this crime family? Is it like the Gambino's?

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer
 
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer
Is there a point to this post other than you did not answer the questions asked of you? I had four question marks in my response to you.
 
Is there a point to this post other than you did not answer the questions asked of you? I had four question marks in my response to you.

They haven't been convicted but surely you're aware of what's been uncovered, yes?
They haven't been legally charged with anything but surely you're aware of what's been uncovered, yes?
The entire Biden family participates. Surely you're aware of what's been uncovered, yes?
It's kind of worse than Gambino given the head and what he does.

Your turn.
 
"GOP trying to do a retread to Biden of what they did to Hillary"

And the Democrats are trying to do a smear campaign retreads against any Republican presidential candidates.

In other words, the US political business proceeds as usual.
 
If they issued a subpoena then he is obligated to turn it over. It's not a request. It's a lawful order. They can arrest him without the DOJ being involved. The Sergent at Arms can arrest him and jail him at their jailhouse. Something I will concede they typically do not do.

Wray is doing his level best to conceal a document that we are being told is benign. Why deny it existed and refuse to release it if there's nothing important in it?

This is shaping up to look like the classic, it's not the crime but the cover up that brings them down.
Well, they've already seen the document. I don't understand all the hoopla over this. And Wray is going to bring the document to congress early this week and let them read it again. He will not turn it over.

If it's a lawful order from congress, then a whole lot of Trump WH officials and congress critters should be in jail. How many subpoenas did they blow off in the past 6 years?

On this one, we'll have to let a court decide. If the morons in congress really want to take it that far.
 
Beware of anything you read with a byline like "Story by (name here)".
It's equivalent to "Opinion" or "Analysis".
It ain't straight news reporting.
If it was it would include reports that the FBI's CHS at the center of this particular story was considered "trusted".

Wanna bet that before long it'll be confirmed that Joe is a blackmail target for several Countries because of the sordid history of the Biden Crime Family?
I would put up tha the Biden family is a lot cleaner than the trump family any day of the week. Gopers talk about a million or two that the Bidens got, what about the BIllions that the Tump family got through Kushner from the Saudi's?
 
"GOP trying to do a retread to Biden of what they did to Hillary"

And the Democrats are trying to do a smear campaign retreads against any Republican presidential candidates.

In other words, the US political business proceeds as usual.
I can't remember any point in time when Democratic party members intentionally attempted to damage the economy of the USA in order to cause a GOP POTUS to look bad for an upcoming election. Twice in recent history ('11, '23) the GOP has screwed around with the debt ceiling/enacted austerity to cause economic damage.
 
Back
Top Bottom