- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,046
- Reaction score
- 34,013
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
sure it would. if I can go to ND and get the same policy only 500 bucks cheaper why wouldn't I?
no federal regulations are required.
Because the policy from ND may not meet the standards of the state where you live. If, on t he other hand, that company is selling in your state, then you can buy a policy from them.
yet costs are higher than what they were 10 years ago.
Yes, and they were higher 10 years ago than they were 20 and so on. Double digit increases in costs are nothing new. That's t he core of the problem.
ignoring the article doesn't help your case.
we can do it without the government involved.
Government actually does serve a purpose. Anarchy is not a good system.
Correct, but that has nothing to do with my post.deductibles are for the year not month.
yep something we can do with a new healthcare plan we don't need government run healthcare. it doesn't work.
no unregulated spending will do that.
yep and we can make the system affordable without UHC which will cost even more.
if you spent per capita 10k per person for medical care that would amount to 3 trillion dollars.
and 10k is a drop in the bucket.
Every other modern nation on Earth has UHC, and they all pay a lot less than we do. 10K per person for medical care is a "drop in the bucket??" The actual cost is nearing 9K on average in the USA, or $36,000 for a family of four. That has to be close to the median income for everything. In other countries, the ones that do have UHC, it's a lot less than that. Use a high deductible catastrophic care package that covers everyone, and soon we'd be paying less than everyone else, not more.
Ideology is all well and good, but paying more and not getting more is a poor plan.