yeah lets elect lukewarm moderates who stand for nothing and are easily manipulated into allowing welfare socialism's malignant spread to creep forward.Both of you have just represented the 2 extremes of the issue. On one hand you have the liberal with "I know we got some bad guys but you need bat **** insane to cancel it out?!"
Then you have the conservative saying, "You have some bad guys and we need some bat **** insane people to cancel it out!" The tea party like most fads in our nations collective ADD will go away eventually, if it takes a term of them then that's what it takes. I've heard that polls in Nevada show that more people wish they had a better choice than either Angle or Reid and a higher percentage would rather have better choices than vote for either, something that rarely happens so that just goes to show how bad our political climate is right now.
This is how I read the conversation, starting with turtle, which was the source of spud's comment.Not in what spud quoted.
Absolutist statement by turtle, indicating a level of blindness as society is rarely absolute in any degree.yeah lets elect lukewarm moderates who stand for nothing and are easily manipulated into allowing welfare socialism's malignant spread to creep forward.
Spud pointing this out.you're right, blind partisans are so much better than people who actually think :roll:
False distinction based on the exchange between sput and turtle, so I thought I would be helpful and point it out.How do you come to the conclusion that moderates think by default?