• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP Senator Introduces Bill to Make All Porn a Federal Crime, Following Project 2025 Playbook

Do you support ignoring the due process rights of illegal immigrants?

Do you support suspending habeas corpus?

Do you support Trump and DOGE violating the Constitution by trying to take away Congress’s power of the purse?

Do you support Trump running for a third term in violation of the Constitution?

If you support these things then you do not believe in the Constitution, and you just might be a fascist.

Yes, but the far left wants people to accept trans people in society, prosecutions for cops killing civilians, and the removal of statues put up to praise racists, and that is the same the same as looking into suspending habeas corpus, due process, and sending everyone we don't like to El Salvador.

Exzacteley the same. Checkmate, liberals!

🥰
 
I'm not ashamed to say I've been on Pornhub and because I am a Texas resident it is no longer available. Following is the message TX residents receive. It's coming, folks! (No pun intended.)

Dear user,

As you may know, your elected officials in Texas are requiring us to verify your age before allowing you access to our website.
Not only does this impinge on the rights of adults to access protected speech, it fails strict scrutiny by employing the least effective and yet also most restrictive means of accomplishing Texas’s stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors.
While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, providing identification every time you want to visit an adult platform is not an effective solution for protecting users online, and in fact, will put minors and your privacy at risk.
Attempting to mandate age verification without any means to enforce at scale gives platforms the choice to comply or not, leaving hundreds of thousands of websites open and accessible.
As we've seen in other states, such bills have failed to protect minors, by driving users from those few websites which comply, to the hundreds of thousands of websites with far fewer safety measures in place, which do not comply. Very few sites are able to compare to the robust Trust and Safety measures we currently have in place. To protect minors and user privacy, any legislation must be enforced against all platforms offering adult content.
Unfortunately, the Texas law for age verification is ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous. Not only will it not actually protect children, but it will also inevitably reduce content creators’ ability to post and distribute legal adult content and directly impact their ability to share the artistic messages they want to convey with it.
The safety of our users is one of our biggest concerns. We believe that the only effective solution for protecting minors and adults alike is to verify users’ age on their device and to either deny or allow access to age-restricted materials and websites based on that verification.
We call on all adult sites to comply with the law. Until the real solution is offered, we have made the difficult decision to completely disable access to our website in Texas. In doing so, we are complying with the law, as we always do, but hope that governments around the world will implement laws that actually protect the safety and security of users.
We encourage you to:
  1. Learn more about device-based age verification* solutions that make the internet safer while also respecting your privacy.
  2. Contact your representatives and demand device-based verification solutions that make the internet safer while also respecting your privacy.

*Device-Based Age Verification refers to any approach to age verification where the personal information that is used to verify the user’s age is either shared in-person at an authorized retailer, inputted locally into the user’s device, or stored on a network controlled by the device manufacturer or the supplier of the device’s operating system. Whether through pre-installed content blocking and filtering software, the disabling of web-browsing permissions, or other means, the user will then be prevented from accessing age-restricted content over the internet unless they are age-verified. To come to fruition, such an approach requires the cooperation of manufacturers and operating-system providers.
Florida is doing the same. It's also not just pornhub. It's also, Xhmaster, Redgifs (just gifs or porn clips) etc. There are some that are completely not impacted because there are so many porn sites it's going to get overlooked. The fact of the matter is, this is the GOP using the "safety of children" as a way to police what people do and see in their own home.
 
Porn is prostitution so at least it would establish some consistency in the law. 🤷‍♂️
Prostitution isn't federally banned.

Did @Napoleon run away because he was caught making shit up from his first post? I do not know, we will have to check on this but I do not see any other posts from him.

😁
 
Did @Napoleon run away because he was caught making shit up from his first post? I do not know, we will have to check on this but I do not see any other posts from him.

😁
No. I’ve been engaged in more interesting topics. Who does the punishing is irrelevant. What is relevant is the disparate treatment between street walkers and porn actors despite the fact they’re all engaged in prostitution. If prostitution should be a criminal offense then it shouldn’t matter who is paying them, be it a studio or a John.
 
No. I’ve been engaged in more interesting topics. Who does the punishing is irrelevant. What is relevant is the disparate treatment between street walkers and porn actors despite the fact they’re all engaged in prostitution. If prostitution should be a criminal offense then it shouldn’t matter who is paying them, be it a studio or a John.

Neither prostitution nor pornography are federally illegal. Different states have different laws concerning prostitution. The same goes for pornography. This is a thread about a federal effort to make pornography illegal.

What are you blabbering about?
 
Someone started a thread about the ADF, a super conservative legal advocacy group who has been slowly but surely infiltrating the highest levels of government. They aren't going to stop here.

John Oliver did a nice piece on them the other night.
I love the clip of the daughter of one of the head honcho's speaking out about trans student on a team that she played against, and they lot Bigly.
Only snag? There WAS NO trans player on the team.
Yo mother****ers don't let the truth get in the way of a wholesome outrage.
 
Who gets to decide what porn is?

Are we going to need to put black rectangles on paintings in museums?
Lest we forget this backward thinking bullshit.
 
Even though I think it should be taxed, highly, like all sin taxes, and believe it is poison for our communities, it should never be banned.

Oh okay, thanks for level headed fundi Christian opinion.
 



Banning porn. Weird, but expected. Hop on retards, we are going winning in 2025.

😁
For a law to be valid, there must be a compelling governmental interest. In part attempts, promoters used protection of minors as a rationale. In 1957, SCOTUS ruled against that, in
Butler v. State of Michigan
352 U.S. 380 (1957)
In this case, the Court rejected the principle that adult material must be restricted because it might harm minors. Striking down a Michigan statute outlawing printed material that contained obscene language "tending to the corruption of the morals of youth," Justice Felix Frankfurter noted that the sweep of the restriction was far too broad: "The State insists that, by thus quarantining the general reading public against books not too rugged for grown men and women in order to shield juvenile innocence, it is exercising its power to promote the general welfare. Surely, this is to burn the house to roast the pig."

Justice Frankfurter held that the law violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment because it "reduce[d] the adult population of Michigan to reading only what is fit for children."

This decision repudiated the earlier, longstanding test for obscenity. Based on British common law, the "Hicklin principle" declared obscene any material that tended to "deprave or corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, " including children.
See:

I find it hypocritical that Republicans used to believe in states rights until they want to ban something nationally.
 
Wow, the commies are really getting down to it, huh?
The porn industry is an enormous player in and beneficiary of sex trafficking. The only way to stop it is to make it unprofitable. At the very least, I would say our society is overdue for a conversation about whether your jollies are worth supporting entities that profit from sex trafficking by hosting content featuring victims.
 
Is it persecution if the thing someone accuses you of is so off base, they might as well be in orbit?

Or is it it just dumbassery?

Thank you for providing your Christian fundimentalist opinion. I thank you for it.

😇
 
Back
Top Bottom