• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP proven to be liars yet again!


Hmm…

While the witnesses disputed Shapley’s key allegations from that meeting, they acknowledged Weiss was having trouble finding a venue to bring charges against the president’s son, as US attorneys from other states rejected partnering on the case. They also expressed frustration with the pace of the probe, which at that point had been ongoing for roughly four years.

It seems they can’t recall what (who?) was causing that “trouble”.
 
The HOUSE GOP MAGATS are still searching for WALDO.
 
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
 
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
Witnesses to the meeting are not disagreeing Shapely took notes but that they believe he essentially misunderstood what took place and what was said.
 
Witnesses to the meeting are not disagreeing Shapely took notes but that they believe he essentially misunderstood what took place and what was said.
That's a far cry from a proven lie as the OP is claiming in the thread title.
 
Who was vaping this time?
 
Republicans, Righties, and Trump bootlickers are among the stupidist people on the planet.

Nuff said?
 
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?

Shall I make us some coffee while we wait? :coffee:
 
Mud at the wall, mud at the wall, mud at the wall - nothing stuck? mud at the wall, mud at the wall. That's what Republicans do.
 
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
The fact that they were in the same room and did not hear the same things is evidence that there is a liar.
 
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
Proves Shapely who was way out over his skis from the start does not know what he is talking about. This is the guy STUUUUPID enough to claim in his testimony that he was expecting a promotion and that his involvement in the Hunter Biden probe caused him to not be promoted. Smooth move dunce cap.

His insistence that Weiss claimed he did ask for Special Counsel status and was rejected is contrary to both the AG's and Weiss's own statements. Garland is the head of DoJ and Weiss is a US Attorney. Sort of hard to hold the IRS agent as credible here. He is not even in DoJ and is clearly confused about how the Dept works as well as being mystified by PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION.
 
Proves Shapely who was way out over his skis from the start does not know what he is talking about. This is the guy STUUUUPID enough to claim in his testimony that he was expecting a promotion and that his involvement in the Hunter Biden probe caused him to not be promoted. Smooth move dunce cap.

His insistence that Weiss claimed he did ask for Special Counsel status and was rejected is contrary to both the AG's and Weiss's own statements. Garland is the head of DoJ and Weiss is a US Attorney. Sort of hard to hold the IRS agent as credible here. He is not even in DoJ and is clearly confused about how the Dept works as well as being mystified by PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION.
It does not prove he or the gop is lying, which is the false narrative the OP is trying to push in this thread.
 
It does not prove he or the gop is lying, which is the false narrative the OP is trying to push in this thread.
When you are as far over your skis as Shapley is you are lying....Shapley's premise is that he knows what he is talking about and he doesn't. His premise is A LIE!
 
When you are as far over your skis as Shapley is you are lying....Shapley's premise is that he knows what he is talking about and he doesn't. His premise is A LIE!
Shapely took notes during the meeting and later that day sent an email reitterating what was said at the meeting. Those other simply don't recall what was said at a meeting that occurred months or maybe year's before they were questioned. Shapely's testimony seems more credible.
 
Care to back up your claim by pointing out the alleged lie you are referring to?
The fact that a Trump PAC paid them for their testimony only adds to the lack of credibility of these two guys.
 
Look, to be fair, despite the GOP lying thousands of times in the last 20 minutes, it's possible they didn't lie this time (they did).
 
Last edited:
Shapely took notes during the meeting and later that day sent an email reitterating what was said at the meeting. Those other simply don't recall what was said at a meeting that occurred months or maybe year's before they were questioned. Shapely's testimony seems more credible.
Yeah, apparently he was writing tearful goodbye's to a promotion he was pining over insisting that he lost it because of his position regarding the Hunter Biden case. Pardon me if I don't give a shit about his note taking.

He appears remarkably biased by his lack of understanding and his personal agenda. So SORRY BUT NO!!!!!!

If he had any sense at all and if he cared about his job and his position regarding Hunter Biden he would have bitten his tongue about his lost promotion. But of course he could not help himself.
 
Back
Top Bottom