- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Messages
- 28,614
- Reaction score
- 25,563
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
IRS whistleblower testimony is now in doubt.
IRS whistleblower testimony is now in doubt.
While the witnesses disputed Shapley’s key allegations from that meeting, they acknowledged Weiss was having trouble finding a venue to bring charges against the president’s son, as US attorneys from other states rejected partnering on the case. They also expressed frustration with the pace of the probe, which at that point had been ongoing for roughly four years.
Witnesses to the meeting are not disagreeing Shapely took notes but that they believe he essentially misunderstood what took place and what was said.So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
That's a far cry from a proven lie as the OP is claiming in the thread title.Witnesses to the meeting are not disagreeing Shapely took notes but that they believe he essentially misunderstood what took place and what was said.
Yes it is.That's a far cry from a proven lie as the OP is claiming in the thread title.
So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
Shall I make us some coffee while we wait?![]()
The fact that they were in the same room and did not hear the same things is evidence that there is a liar.So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
That's a far cry from a proven lie as the OP is claiming in the thread title.
Care to back up your claim by pointing out the alleged lie you are referring to?Dodge all you want.
GOP lied.
Proves Shapely who was way out over his skis from the start does not know what he is talking about. This is the guy STUUUUPID enough to claim in his testimony that he was expecting a promotion and that his involvement in the Hunter Biden probe caused him to not be promoted. Smooth move dunce cap.So they stated they could not recall. That's a far cry cry from it not of been said. Shapely took notes and sent an emailing detailing his account later in the day after the meeting. So what exactly is the proven lie that the OP is claiming?
Color me unsurprised. Called this one from the start.IRS whistleblower testimony is now in doubt.
It does not prove he or the gop is lying, which is the false narrative the OP is trying to push in this thread.Proves Shapely who was way out over his skis from the start does not know what he is talking about. This is the guy STUUUUPID enough to claim in his testimony that he was expecting a promotion and that his involvement in the Hunter Biden probe caused him to not be promoted. Smooth move dunce cap.
His insistence that Weiss claimed he did ask for Special Counsel status and was rejected is contrary to both the AG's and Weiss's own statements. Garland is the head of DoJ and Weiss is a US Attorney. Sort of hard to hold the IRS agent as credible here. He is not even in DoJ and is clearly confused about how the Dept works as well as being mystified by PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION.
When you are as far over your skis as Shapley is you are lying....Shapley's premise is that he knows what he is talking about and he doesn't. His premise is A LIE!It does not prove he or the gop is lying, which is the false narrative the OP is trying to push in this thread.
Shapely took notes during the meeting and later that day sent an email reitterating what was said at the meeting. Those other simply don't recall what was said at a meeting that occurred months or maybe year's before they were questioned. Shapely's testimony seems more credible.When you are as far over your skis as Shapley is you are lying....Shapley's premise is that he knows what he is talking about and he doesn't. His premise is A LIE!
The fact that a Trump PAC paid them for their testimony only adds to the lack of credibility of these two guys.Care to back up your claim by pointing out the alleged lie you are referring to?
That isn't proof that they lied.The fact that a Trump PAC paid them for their testimony only adds to the lack of credibility of these two guys.
Yeah, apparently he was writing tearful goodbye's to a promotion he was pining over insisting that he lost it because of his position regarding the Hunter Biden case. Pardon me if I don't give a shit about his note taking.Shapely took notes during the meeting and later that day sent an email reitterating what was said at the meeting. Those other simply don't recall what was said at a meeting that occurred months or maybe year's before they were questioned. Shapely's testimony seems more credible.