If the law allows it they can but they don't have a right to that which supersedes the legal authority to restrict it. States legislators can implement whatever limitations or even an out right ban of them as they feel is appropriate.
Again, gestation and rearing are 2 different things. But when there is a child born, then the focus and legality center on what is best for the child. Both parties then share legal and financial obligations. So it is equal.
They will certainly try. I suspect that will bite them in the ass down the road. I'm also sure some women will seek abortion by various means even if the law doesn't allow it.
State legislatures cannot prohibit abortion before the third trimester (Roe v. Wade).
Actually, that would be PP v. Casey (1992) which does that. Roe initially established the trimester framework, limiting abortions to the 1st trimester.
Until they overturn it this month.
I don't deny the burdens of motherhood. What I dont do is give them a higher value than the burdens of fatherhood. I treat them as they should be treated, as equals.
When men get pregnant, then they'll be equal.
Just because they face different burden does not mean they are not equal. You attitude is why I support banning all abortions. Holding everyone equally accountable at the point of conception deystroys the misandrist argument
What burden do men face during a woman's pregnancy? Dealing with mood swings? There is no equality in pregnancy. It is very 1 sided. And the fact that you support banning abortion just because of some perceived faux injustice is just spiteful and misogynistic!
Men need to prepare for fatherhood same as women need to prepare for motherhood.
It is FACT.
I guess you can’t risk your life and gestate a pregnancy and because of that you will be forever discriminated against.
Do let us know when YOUR body suffers the ravages of pregnancy and childbirth, k?
She consented to the risk of pregnancy. She did NOT agree to go to term if she did get pregnant.
Your opinion. You are entitled to it but you cannot stop us.
So what's the issue then? You complain about inequality, yet provide an example of equality. You defeat your own argument. Men risk nothing during a woman's pregnancy. It's the woman who takes the risks.
You seem to think that because of our biological differences it entitles women to legal privileges that men are excluded from. I disagree on that point and support both genders equally. I'm not asking for you to help me with anything. I am comfortable with my position.
Once you remove the option of abortion your statements become contradictory
What I stated is a fact.
There is no issue. People who are not willing to accept the risks should not have sex. What's the problem with that?
Nope. The woman is still the one getting pregnant and having to deal with it. The man does not.
I said nothing about sex. I was talking about pregnancy, which is uniquely the woman's burden.
On this case, biological differences makes all the difference.
It doesn't limit abortions to the first trimester. The second trimester states can regulate, but not prohibit, abortions.