• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP men have decided Men decide what happens to a woman's body when pregnant.

Gator said:
If a state chooses to prohibit abortion it is the government, not men, who are controlling women's bodies just as they control men's bodies. Except men do not have that extra right (to abortion) that women have.
Click to expand...
Men do have the right to abort anytime they find themselves pregnant.
 
Gator said:
If a state chooses to prohibit abortion it is the government, not men, who are controlling women's bodies just as they control men's bodies. Except men do not have that extra right (to abortion) that women have.
Click to expand...
So . . . . you're admitting that women have the right to an abortion?
 
A sexist male bashing thread.

Wow!
 
Scrabaholic said:
Men do have the right to abort anytime they find themselves pregnant.
Click to expand...
Is that often? Actually, in Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court said abortion is a private decision between a woman and her doctor.
 
Davin said:
The SCOTUS has now decided that Man has more rights to a woman's body than her. Plain and simple. There is no other way to look at this decision. The majority of state government's are men and it is man that is deciding that women, once pregnant, are machines to be controlled by the state until they give birth.
Click to expand...
Currently, there is no such court decision.
 
MamboDervish said:
DUH !

Couldn't come up with a better comeback than that?
Click to expand...
I just stated an obvious fact that I assumed you already knew; yet, you asked me if a woman has that right.
 
Gordy327 said:
Legally and rationally, it is a factual thing to say.
Click to expand...
Yes, that group of cells that is genetically independent from the mother is not a life, good call. History is full of tragedies where one group decides what is a worthy life..
 
Davin said:
The SCOTUS has now decided that Man has more rights to a woman's body than her. Plain and simple. There is no other way to look at this decision. The majority of state government's are men and it is man that is deciding that women, once pregnant, are machines to be controlled by the state until they give birth.
Click to expand...
You would have a point if women were not trying to control men's bodies, but they are, so you don't. The fact that women don't like it being done back to them is really uninteresting.
 
mrjurrs said:
A baby is born. If unborn, it's not a baby. Did you want to add that liberals are educated?
Click to expand...
Science LITERALLY defines a fetus as an 'unborn baby'.

The development process of the unborn child is described by OBGyns as
"From conception to labor, your baby is constantly growing and developing. Your baby moves through different stages, starting as a blastocyst, then maturing into an embryo, and then a fetus. Around the 5 week mark, your baby's heart will begin to beat, at 27 weeks they'll have regular sleep and wake cycles, and at 39 weeks your baby is physically developed."

Your baby.

That you celebrate butchering.

Because the baby is inconvenient.
 
trouble13 said:
You would have a point if women were not trying to control men's bodies, but they are, so you don't. The fact that women don't like it being done back to them is really uninteresting.
Click to expand...
What physical and mental changes is a man forced to go through in a pregnancy?
 
Renae said:
Yes, that group of cells that is genetically independent from the mother is not a life, good call. History is full of tragedies where one group decides what is a worthy life..
Click to expand...
Yes, a group of cells is all it it. And it's not independent. It's attached to and feeding off the woman for its own benefit, like a parasite. And your statement does not refute what I said in the least: abortion is not murder! Your statement is little more than some appeal to emotion.
 
VanceMack said:
Science LITERALLY defines a fetus as an 'unborn baby'.
Click to expand...
Not quite: Science defines fetus as the unborn mammalian offspring during (human) gestation from 8 weeks until birth. At birth, it becomes an actual born baby. "Unborn baby" is just a common term used to refer to a fetus.
VanceMack said:
The development process of the unborn child is described by OBGyns as
"From conception to labor, your baby is constantly growing and developing. Your baby moves through different stages, starting as a blastocyst, then maturing into an embryo, and then a fetus. Around the 5 week mark, your baby's heart will begin to beat, at 27 weeks they'll have regular sleep and wake cycles, and at 39 weeks your baby is physically developed."

Your baby.
Click to expand...
Nope, first it's a zygote, then blastocyst, then embryo, then fetus, and then (at birth), newborn (baby).
VanceMack said:
That you celebrate butchering.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the emotional platitude, which is not convincing.
VanceMack said:
Because the baby is inconvenient.
Click to expand...
Who cares? That's up for the woman in question to decide.
 
Gordy327 said:
Not quite: Science defines fetus as the unborn mammalian offspring during (human) gestation from 8 weeks until birth. At birth, it becomes an actual born baby. "Unborn baby" is just a common term used to refer to a fetus.

Nope, first it's a zygote, then blastocyst, then embryo, then fetus, and then (at birth), newborn (baby).

Thank you for the emotional platitude, which is not convincing.

Who cares? That's up for the woman in question to decide.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you think your continued efforts to dehumanize the babies you endorse butchering makes your support of the butchering of unborn babies less inhuman.

It doesnt.
 
VanceMack said:
I'm sure you think your continued efforts to dehumanize the babies you endorse butchering makes your support of the butchering of unborn babies less inhuman.

It doesnt.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you think your efforts at emotional appeals or manipulation will somehow prove a point or support your argument, whatever that is.
It doesn't!
 
trouble13 said:
Are you unaware of the responsibilities attached to fatherhood?
Click to expand...
Fatherhood comes at birth. The question is what changes does the man go thru during a woman's pregnancy?
 
Gordy327 said:
I'm sure you think your efforts at emotional appeals or manipulation will somehow prove a point or support your argument, whatever that is.
It doesn't!
Click to expand...
My words just peel away the bullshit and expose your actions. You are free to support the butchering of unborn babies, but trying to dehumanize the babies you support killing doesnt make the support of the killing of unborn babies any less inhumane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom