Not sure whom you mean. Pretty much all my friends and acquaintances are Republicans. Never heard anyone give much of a shit.If MAGAs
initially had such a hard on for the files to be released, why aren't Trumplican politicians demanding it en masse now that they have a deathgrip on all branches of government?
We can do this all day.
Trump and his political party are DEEP STATE!
You can do math. Wonderful!2019 is not 20 years ago.
Nice defenseAnd Biden didnt micro manage the justice department. That is the way its suppossed to wor
MAGA gave a shit about it.Whatever you say. I never gave much of a shit about it and don't know anyone who has (despite pretty much all of my friends and acquaintances being Republicans).
So what do you want me to do about it?MAGA gave a shit about it.
You cant deny it.
was not an issue thenBut let me guess....when the Biden administration held on to them...totally defensible.
So you question Trump's critical thinking capabilities.So what do you want me to do about it?
It's still a red herring. If someone in MAGA cared that much about it, I'd probably question his critical thinking capabilities.
So does Trump care "that much" about releasing the files as you claim MAGA does, or does he want to conceal the info? Make up your mind.So you question Trump's critical thinking capabilities.
Good, welcome to the club
Well, Derp State.Trump and his political party are DEEP STATE!
He is being pretty unambiguous about it. He wants everyone to please stop talking about it. For some reason.So does Trump care "that much" about releasing the files as you claim MAGA does, or does he want to conceal the info? Make up your mind.
He has been on both sides of that.So does Trump care "that much" about releasing the files as you claim MAGA does, or does he want to conceal the info? Make up your mind.
It was important then, and it's important now.
There doesn't need to be prosecutable evidence of a crime to release the Epstein treasure trove. A person's level of involvement, participation and frequency is demanded by the public's right to know, especially regarding elected officials.
Bullshit. You're advocating opacity when transparency was promised to the voters, and transparency is being demanded by the electorate.
was not an issue then
How I do what? I don't give much of a shit about red herring issues, like I told you already.He has been on both sides of that.
It must give you whiplash.
I dont know how you do it.
I couldnt no matter how much i liked a politician.
Why not? It isn't a matter of national security. By what right is that information being withheld from the public? The Divine Right of Kings?They can demand it all they want, but if it's none of their effing business, they shouldn't get it.
Why not? It isn't a matter of national security. By what right is that information being withheld from the public? The Divine Right of Kings?
Bullshit. The only "private information" we're talking about is the information of a dead man - Epstein.You don't have a right to other people's private information.
Bullshit. The only "private information" we're talking about is the information of a dead man - Epstein.
I have no less right than the government does.
If it's information about the malfeasance of elected officials, then the public has the right to know.Of course you do. That's why information used in criminal investigations is often kept under seal. And it's not just information of a dead man. If that was all it supposedly was, nobody would be interested in it.
If it's information about the malfeasance of elected officials, then the public has the right to know.