Google admits Biden admin pushed them to censor speech on their platform

[pedex]

And at the time that was the thought.
Turns out if you were vaccinated you could still get one of the covid variants but the symptoms were far less severe and recovery was faster.

No at the time the official stance and narrative of the vaccine makers was it would not stop the virus from propagating only allegedly lessen the severity of the symptoms. This was known before the vaccines were even created, and when this was pointed out it was censored and deemed misinformation.

 

[KingLeo]

No at the time the official stance and narrative of the vaccine makers was it would not stop the virus from propagating only allegedly lessen the severity of the symptoms. This was known before the vaccines were even created, and when this was pointed out it was censored and deemed misinformation.

Fact remains that if you were vaccinated your risk of contracting covid was greatly reduced.
And no vaccine, no drug of any kind, is 100% for every person.
Instructing people to get vaccinated during a worldwide pandemic was the responsible thing to be telling people.
Nothing wrong with the government asking Google to stop false and misleading information from being spread on their site.

 

[OpportunityCost]

Come on. You conspiracy theory story didn't say what bank executives or even what banks made the conspiracy theory claim.
Do you have a source from something other than extreme RW BS?

What occurred at gov't direction? And how is a gov't direction a threat? What exactly was the threat.

This claim of yours is extremely weak and far right biased.

You need something more concrete than some executives at no named banks.
That's like saying you heard from your mother's brothers sister in laws daughter that she heard from her uncle's dads, sister this story.

So you're still here trying to defend the FCC threatening licenses of media companies. You are against free speech.

Dude, they debanked Trump. He had to go to Deutsch for a reason. It's not my fault you are completely uninformed.

 

[OpportunityCost]

LOL. You really are referring to JIm Crow laws and redlining laws of the past to put blacks in poverty.

That's so out of left field...why are you lying?

 

[dairyair]

Dude, they debanked Trump. He had to go to Deutsch for a reason. It's not my fault you are completely uninformed.

Who debunked trump?
I am informed, except for your conspiracy theory stuff. I don't do conspiracy theory BS.
That's why you brought Obama into the topic that has nothing to do with the topic.

 

[dairyair]

If you cannot get a loan or deposit money or even cash a check because you cannot open an account because of speech then it becomes about speech.

Dude, they debanked Trump. He had to go to Deutsch for a reason. It's not my fault you are completely uninformed.

What you described is what the USA did to blacks. Duh.
Only about skin color.
Nothing like that occurred due to speech. To anyone.

You can't prove it happened.

 

[OpportunityCost]

Who debunked trump?
I am informed, except for your conspiracy theory stuff. I don't do conspiracy theory BS.
That's why you brought Obama into the topic that has nothing to do with the topic.

You are totally uninformed about this subject even though I gave you information. Obama began debanking for certain businesses he didn't like, such as firearms shops. That was chokepoint 1.0. Biden extended it in chokepoint 2.0 by pressuring the banking industry to go after conservatives.

Some reading material:

MSN

Trump orders federal regulators to probe alleged bank discrimination against conservatives

President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and industries like gun manufacturers and cryptocurrency companies.

apnews.com

MSN

Bank of America boycott calls grow after MAGA accounts closed

Trump lawyer John Eastman claims he was "de-banked" for helping the former president try to overturn the 2020 election results.

www.newsweek.com

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/01/debanked-crypto-andreessen-joe-rogan

So, just to add, it is not redlining which occurred to black people during the 80s and 90s. That is steering house buying to certain areas and denying it in certain areas. Debanking is closing all their accounts and making it almost impossible to get new ones to conduct business of any sort.

 

[dairyair]

You are totally uninformed about this subject even though I gave you information. Obama began debanking for certain businesses he didn't like, such as firearms shops. That was chokepoint 1.0. Biden extended it in chokepoint 2.0 by pressuring the banking industry to go after conservatives.

Some reading material:

MSN

Trump orders federal regulators to probe alleged bank discrimination against conservatives

President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and industries like gun manufacturers and cryptocurrency companies.

apnews.com

MSN

Bank of America boycott calls grow after MAGA accounts closed

Trump lawyer John Eastman claims he was "de-banked" for helping the former president try to overturn the 2020 election results.

www.newsweek.com

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/01/debanked-crypto-andreessen-joe-rogan

So, just to add, it is not redlining which occurred to black people during the 80s and 90s. That is steering house buying to certain areas and denying it in certain areas. Debanking is closing all their accounts and making it almost impossible to get new ones to conduct business of any sort.

So trump opened an investigation. Big deal. That's not proof of anything yet.\

You other link is over 1.5 yrs old. Got something that proves it was real? Must be something else if it's that old. Or did the story just die.

Don't just push nonsense, provide proof.

 

[Manc Skipper]

No at the time the official stance and narrative of the vaccine makers was it would not stop the virus from propagating only allegedly lessen the severity of the symptoms. This was known before the vaccines were even created, and when this was pointed out it was censored and deemed misinformation.

Do you have verifiable examples from before the vaccines were created?

 

[OpportunityCost]

So trump opened an investigation. Big deal. That's not proof of anything yet.\

You other link is over 1.5 yrs old. Got something that proves it was real? Must be something else if it's that old. Or did the story just die.

Don't just push nonsense, provide proof.

Dont push stupidity read ALL of the links. There are 4 there and one of them is only 2 weeks old and a firsthand example.

This is why no one buys leftist bullshit, they keep trying to lie and cheat their way past uncomfortable truths instead of admitting they might be wrong about anything.

 

[dairyair]

Dont push stupidity read ALL of the links. There are 4 there and one of them is only 2 weeks old and a firsthand example.

This is why no one buys leftist bullshit, they keep trying to lie and cheat their way past uncomfortable truths instead of admitting they might be wrong about anything.

Your links didn't show up like there were 4, unless one looked closely.

Also, if your links have some pertinent info, copy/paste, the pertinent info so one can see what makes your point. If one doesn't do that, it assumes to be a waste of time because often the links don't show the person's proof.

Post the proof and stop wasting time with conspiracy theories. Where's the lawsuits?? Where's the legal cases??


Where's the proof R's were targeted and what was the result of those specific targets.
And don't give BS about someone violating policies resulting in loss of functions for violating company policies.

IOW, show your work. Most don't have time to look at 4 links trying to figure out what a person wants to say.

Post the part that makes your case with the link. If there is any part of the link that makes your case.
Show this cheating. Stop posting stuff that you haven't proved.

If you make the claim, provide the proof showing it. Random links are a waste of time.

All you seem to be doing is supporting FCC threatening licenses of media companies. Like you are ok with limiting free speech.

You have yet to say what the FCC threatened was wrong. You keep showing BS about what you think someone else may have done, without proof.

 

[dairyair]

Dont push stupidity read ALL of the links. There are 4 there and one of them is only 2 weeks old and a firsthand example.

This is why no one buys leftist bullshit, they keep trying to lie and cheat their way past uncomfortable truths instead of admitting they might be wrong about anything.

There's no denying what the FCC did. All your deflections seems to support FCC threats on speech.
This is why no one buys MAGA lies/bullshit. They lie, cheat and omit the truths, while pushing conspiracy theories.

NOTE below how I show the pertinent info with the link. So you can see it's not random BS.
And it's from a MAGA favorite

Now do you have something that concrete? Or just going to continue with upset people who's feeling were hurt.

...

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr said in an interview published Monday that he is willing to penalize major media companies if he and President Donald Trump believe they are "out of line."

Pro-Trump FCC chair willing to yank media broadcast licenses, says they're not 'sacred cows'

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has embraced President Donald Trump's approach to media accountability, threatening to revoke licenses and investigating major broadcasters like Comcast.

www.foxnews.com

 

[OpportunityCost]

Your links didn't show up like there were 4, unless one looked closely.

Also, if your links have some pertinent info, copy/paste, the pertinent info so one can see what makes your point. If one doesn't do that, it assumes to be a waste of time because often the links don't show the person's proof.

Post the proof and stop wasting time with conspiracy theories. Where's the lawsuits?? Where's the legal cases??


Where's the proof R's were targeted and what was the result of those specific targets.
And don't give BS about someone violating policies resulting in loss of functions for violating company policies.

IOW, show your work. Most don't have time to look at 4 links trying to figure out what a person wants to say.

Post the part that makes your case with the link. If there is any part of the link that makes your case.
Show this cheating. Stop posting stuff that you haven't proved.

If you make the claim, provide the proof showing it. Random links are a waste of time.

All you seem to be doing is supporting FCC threatening licenses of media companies. Like you are ok with limiting free speech.

You have yet to say what the FCC threatened was wrong. You keep showing BS about what you think someone else may have done, without proof.

Bank of America boycott calls grow after MAGA accounts closed

Trump lawyer John Eastman claims he was "de-banked" for helping the former president try to overturn the 2020 election results.

www.newsweek.com

John Eastman, a former lawyer for Donald Trump, recently claimed his Bank of America and USAA accounts were closed in response to his attempts to help the former president overturn the 2020 election results.

MSN

Happ, an elder at the Servants of Christ Church in Memphis, started to sweat. He had over $270,000 socked away at Bank of America in three accounts—all getting closed by the bank—including one for his charity that supports churches and orphanages in Uganda. He had bills due, five full-time employees to pay and money that was supposed to go to the orphanages for food. Happ drove to his bank branch in Memphis, convinced there was a mistake. The letters from the bank said “we have determined you’re operating in a business type we have chosen not to service.”

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/01/debanked-crypto-andreessen-joe-rogan

Anchorage Digital, a crypto-bank that got debanked, testified before a Senate committee Wednesday on behalf of its industry, one that claims it has had an unfairly hard time holding onto financial services in recent years.

What is Debanking? Political and Religious Discrimination by Financial Institutions.

Debanking is an attempt by big financial firms shut accounts of those they disagree with, be it for political or religious reasons.

thefga.org

The National Committee for Religious Freedom (NCRF)’s checking account with JP Morgan Chase was suddenly closed with no explanation in the spring of 2022.

When the organization—led by a diverse board of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Hindus dedicated to promoting religious freedom in America—inquired about the closure, they received a list of demands from the financial institution. They were told their account would be reinstated if they provided a list of their large donors, political candidates they support, and an explanation of how the NCRF determines what candidates they support.

 

[dairyair]

Bank of America boycott calls grow after MAGA accounts closed

Trump lawyer John Eastman claims he was "de-banked" for helping the former president try to overturn the 2020 election results.

www.newsweek.com

MSN

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/01/debanked-crypto-andreessen-joe-rogan

What is Debanking? Political and Religious Discrimination by Financial Institutions.

Debanking is an attempt by big financial firms shut accounts of those they disagree with, be it for political or religious reasons.

thefga.org

Who debanked Eastman?
Where's the case going to court? Anyone can make a claim. But if real, they take action and make a case.

Did Elder file a suit? Did he get his money out of the bank? I see nothing about the gov't telling bank of America to close that account.
Why are you still defending the FCC stating they will take action against those trump doesn't like?

WTF is Anchorage Digital? And how does that mean the gov't is involve and a free speech issue?

So, the NCRF was some sort of front for dark money funding campaigns? Why would a bank want to be involved in shady risky business?
Where's the gov't involved in the closing of the account. Afterall, per you, the bank said they'd reopen it if they kept legit money.

None of those links tie any gov't entity with threats of shutting them down.


Now, are you going to stop defending trump's FCC telling media companies they may lose their license if they say things trump doesn't like.
Why are you against free speech?
You never answer that question.

 

[OpportunityCost]

There's no denying what the FCC did. All your deflections seems to support FCC threats on speech.
This is why no one buys MAGA lies/bullshit. They lie, cheat and omit the truths, while pushing conspiracy theories.

NOTE below how I show the pertinent info with the link. So you can see it's not random BS.
And it's from a MAGA favorite

Now do you have something that concrete? Or just going to continue with upset people who's feeling were hurt.

...

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr said in an interview published Monday that he is willing to penalize major media companies if he and President Donald Trump believe they are "out of line."

Pro-Trump FCC chair willing to yank media broadcast licenses, says they're not 'sacred cows'

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has embraced President Donald Trump's approach to media accountability, threatening to revoke licenses and investigating major broadcasters like Comcast.

www.foxnews.com

You are the reason no one ever gives a link to anything. Take your dishonest ****ery posting home.

The FCC gets to regulate on air content to an extent. Let me know when you understand that, probably the same time you acknowledge debanking occurred.

 

[dairyair]

You are the reason no one ever gives a link to anything. Take your dishonest ****ery posting home.

The FCC gets to regulate on air content to an extent. Let me know when you understand that, probably the same time you acknowledge debanking occurred.

I saw your links.
There's no specific gov't threats in any of your links.

I see why you don't want to post links. They don't prove a thing you claim.
Try posting links the support a claim.


But you are still defending the FCC publicly admitting they will threaten media companies trump doesn't like. Shameful.

 

[OpportunityCost]

I saw your links.
There's no specific gov't threats in any of your links.

I see why you don't want to post links. They don't prove a thing you claim.
Try posting links the support a claim.


But you are still defending the FCC publicly admitting they will threaten media companies trump doesn't like. Shameful.

I gave you direct examples where the bank confirmed the pressure and you still say nope. Quit the trolling bullshit.

 

[dairyair]

I gave you direct examples where the bank confirmed the pressure and you still say nope. Quit the trolling bullshit.

Pressure from whom?
Pressure isn't a threat, like you defending the FCC threatening taking licenses away for saying negative things about trump.

You also posted about some group being a front for bribes.
That is why you don't like posting links. They are BS proof of claims made.