• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Good News for Trump!

Tanngrisnir said:
twump's dementia has been evident for years and, as you openly admit, his Adderrall addiction isn't doing him any favors.
Click to expand...

:roll: Bernie Sanders meth and heroin addiction isn't doing him any favors either.
 
SkyChief said:
Nikki Haley is being groomed for the presidency when Trump leaves office in 2024.
Click to expand...

Hell, she actively campaigned against Trump. Trump removed her as Governor, and put a Trumper in that slot. Banished her to the UN, which he hates. She has publicly called trump a liar, and resigned when he pressured her to do wrong.

I think she is a decent person. Way to decent to ever be president. She is plenty "white enough" to run as a democrat, but not quite "white enough" to run as a republican. Do you really see the Christian right supporting a hindu who has a muslim sister who's permanent home is in the middle east?

For that matter, Trey Gowdy isn't a Trumper either. He joined Haley in campaigning against Trump, declined to represent Trump in the impeachment, found no wrong doing in the Bengazi investigation, and left congress because he was disgusted with the Trump administration and politics in general.


Both of these folks are way to decent for the republican party.
 
bluesmoke said:
Not a serious OP. Making numerous claims w/o supporting evidence. Therefor, unfounded.
Click to expand...

Does that poster ever have a serious OP?? I sure as hell haven't seen one.
 
joko104 said:
Millions, maybe tens of millions, of anti-Trumpers will have to either stay home, vote 3rd party or swallow their own vomit and vote for Trump.

Figure 4 more years of Trump and possibly the Republican party sweeping the House.
Click to expand...

You are allowed to dream.

The fact is, it doesn't matter which Democrat runs against Trump. Come Jan. 21, Trump will be looking for a real job.
 
joko104 said:
His opponent will be with one of two 78 year old white men:

The old socialist who has never accomplished anything fantasizing that armies of young people will flock to the polls wearing revolutionary green bretes - with the entire power of capitalism, the MSM, press and Internet - controlled by the wealthiest capitalists on earth - and even the Democratic establishment determined to crush Sanders

OR

The corrupt old man whose old-age dementia is so advanced he can't remember his wife's and daughter's name nor can complete this saying from the Declaration of Independence: "All men are _______."

Millions, maybe tens of millions, of anti-Trumpers will have to either stay home, vote 3rd party or swallow their own vomit and vote for Trump.

Figure 4 more years of Trump and possibly the Republican party sweeping the House.
Click to expand...

It'll be Biden losing to Trump.

That's why the stock market surged.

Democrats - aka sideways conservatives - LOVES them some Trump, and look forward to 4 more years.
 
swing_voter said:
I think there's a whole horde of voters who are tired of Trump's antics. These voters will vote for Biden.
Click to expand...

Trump's antics + Incumbency + Good economy = 4 more years for Trump

Bet on it.
 
SkyChief said:
Nikki Haley is being groomed for the presidency when Trump leaves office in 2024.
Click to expand...

Big mistake if true.

She's a nightmare.

Probably Booty in 2024.
 
Jay59 said:
Right in one. :applaud:

There are whole hoards of voters tired of the constant attacks on Trump and tired of being called names by Democrats. They will vote for Trump. My hoards are both bigger than your hoard.

I have not seen any announcements, but I expect Warren to step aside soon. That leaves only Bernie, Biden and a stack of also ran candidates. The consolidation is a clear sign that the Democratic party has no illusions. This is Trump's race to lose and he has not made a major misstep in three years. It's late to hope for one now. They are conserving resources and hoping not to get killed down ballot. The House is now semi-officially in play, though the polls won't show it for six months.
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

But Tulsi's still in it, and Democrats LOVE Trump far more than you realize.

Down-ballot safety is the fig leaf they use in a desperate attempt to conceal this love.

Many a Democrat heart will flutter in joy when Trump trounces Biden come November.
 
Sandy Shanks said:
You are allowed to dream.

The fact is, it doesn't matter which Democrat runs against Trump. Come Jan. 21, Trump will be looking for a real job.
Click to expand...

More likely a better lawyer than Rudy, since at that point, the SDNY can go after him for all of the dirt they have on him.
 
Pound4abrown said:
Why, that is good news for him.
At a spring chicken-like 73 he should be able to run circles around either of them.
Click to expand...

I think rather than an election Biden and trump should just have a push up contest, winner takes all...
 
Sandy Shanks said:
You are allowed to dream.

The fact is, it doesn't matter which Democrat runs against Trump. Come Jan. 21, Trump will be looking for a real job.
Click to expand...


Court appearances will be his full time job...
 
I'm pretty sure Trump is going to win again. Bernie's policy isn't good enough for people in US. I hope people learn something from this. If I imagine that I'm running, first thing to do before announcing about my candidacy is homework, I mean good extensive research to find out what are current issues in US. That's not enough, so I need to find out what's doable and what's not - talk to people who are already dealing with those things (business, politics, etc) - so I'm not trying to go thru stonewall by running wild agenda (what's already doomed to fail).

When we have a winner, we should look back and see those winning ideas - accept that they are superior to any other candidates ideas. Even when I can't stand Trump (lying dumb pig) I have to admit that he's best choice for US if he win again (assuming people in US know what's best for them).
 
joko104 said:
His opponent will be with one of two 78 year old white men:

The old socialist who has never accomplished anything fantasizing that armies of young people will flock to the polls wearing revolutionary green bretes - with the entire power of capitalism, the MSM, press and Internet - controlled by the wealthiest capitalists on earth - and even the Democratic establishment determined to crush Sanders

OR

The corrupt old man whose old-age dementia is so advanced he can't remember his wife's and daughter's name nor can complete this saying from the Declaration of Independence: "All men are _______."

Millions, maybe tens of millions, of anti-Trumpers will have to either stay home, vote 3rd party or swallow their own vomit and vote for Trump.

Figure 4 more years of Trump and possibly the Republican party sweeping the House.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's easy to forget that Trump is only 42 and surely too young to claim bizarre things that only senility usually produces. So, I'm going with wind turbines causing cancer and staying well-clear of tall whirly things.
 
joko104 said:
If you aren't watching the campaigning why are you wasting time posting on a political forum since the actual politics apparently isn't interesting to you. While you can debate the significance, the facts I posted are known and obvious.
Click to expand...



Saying you have posted facts is a false statement and posting them as such is fake/disinformation.

You claim one candidate is a "socialist" w/o providing any proof of such. You claim another candidate is "corrupt", again w/o any supporting evidence. You claim the same candidate suffers from "dementia", providing questionable, insufficient evidence.

Saying "facts I posted are known and obvious" doesn't make it so. It is not up to me to prove you wrong. The burden of proof in debate is on you, the claim-maker, w/o which your claim is unfounded and your debate opponent, me, need not debate an unfounded claim any further.

Your MO is to make absurd claims, with no proof, and not provide proof when challenged. That's a fact and is your record. You are not a serious debater.
 
Last edited:
bluesmoke said:
Saying you have posted facts is a false statement and posting them as such is fake/disinformation.

His opponent will be with one of two 78 year old white men:

You claim one candidate is a "socialist" w/o providing any proof of such. You claim another candidate is "corrupt", again w/o any supporting evidence. You claim the same candidate suffers from "dementia", providing questionable, insufficient evidence.

Saying "facts I posted are known and obvious" doesn't make it so. It is not up to me to prove you wrong. The burden of proof in debate is on you, the claim-maker, w/o which your claim is unfounded and your debate opponent, me, need not debate an unfounded claim any further.

Your MO is to make absurd claims, with no proof, and not provide proof when challenged. That's a fact and is your record. You are not a serious debater.
Click to expand...

Provide your proof of your claim that Sanders has been lying for over half a century falsely calling himself a socialist. :lamo
 
joko104 said:
Provide your proof of your claim that Sanders has been lying for over half a century falsely calling himself a socialist. :lamo
Click to expand...



I didn't ask for proof of Sanders calling himself a socialist. I asked for proof that he was/is a socialist. That was your claim. Your claim was not "Bernie calls himself a socialist". Learn the English language. Now, what proof do you have that Bernie is a socialist? Do you even know what a socialist is?

More joko evading the burden of proof.
 
maxparrish said:
True. Pence has been the perfect VP, especially for someone like Trump.
Click to expand...

True, Pence is loyal, but is he still useful? That is the question. If not, he needs to go. Worn out tools need to be discarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom