Glock being ignorantly sued. Also, California legislature voted yes to ban Glocks outright. (1 Viewer)

[Maidenrules29]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

 

[RF667799]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

Ford should be sued by the victims in New Orleans, where the guy used one of their products in a mass killing.

Ford markets their trucks as vehicles capable of surmounting obstacles in their path. Like pedestrians.

 

[VanceMack]

The level of stupid on display in the suit is going to be matched by the level of stupid of people in New York that will buy into the suit.

I'd say it has no chance of being successful...but there is no limit to the anti-gun leftist crusaders and their stupidity.

The previous suit against Glock seems to defeat itself in its claim. "claiming the company knows it’s product is “unsuited to personal defense or recreation, [and] enables an individual in possession of the weapon to inflict unparalleled civilian carnage.”

Well...which is it? I mean...if its “unsuited to personal defense" then it cant be used to "inflict carnage", and if it can be used to "inflict carnage", then it is "suited for personal defense."

 

[Rich2018]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

I wish them all the luck.

 

[Maidenrules29]

I wish them all the luck.

And why exactly should Glock be punished for the actions of this lunatic?

 

[RF667799]

And why exactly should Glock be punished for the actions of this lunatic?

In appealing to "luck", he seems to understand there is no rational basis for the suit.

 

[ttwtt78640]

The level of stupid on display in the suit is going to be matched by the level of stupid of people in New York that will buy into the suit.

I'd say it has no chance of being successful...but there is no limit to the anti-gun leftist crusaders and their stupidity.

The previous suit against Glock seems to defeat itself in its claim. "claiming the company knows it’s product is “unsuited to personal defense or recreation, [and] enables an individual in possession of the weapon to inflict unparalleled civilian carnage.”

Well...which is it? I mean...if its “unsuited to personal defense" then it cant be used to "inflict carnage", and if it can be used to "inflict carnage", then it is "suited for personal defense."

Yep, and now this:

Austria-based Glock has endangered the public with its marketing strategy, including failing to “stop the glorification of Glock” as the weapon of choice in rap lyrics, and in movies and TV, the lawsuit argues.

How, exactly, could Glock (or any gun other manufacturer) prevent rappers, or other entertainers from mentioning or using their products?

 

[RF667799]

Yep, and now this:



How, exactly, could Glock (or any gun other manufacturer) prevent rappers, or other entertainers from mentioning or using their products?

Maybe the entities in the Gun Control Industry that have claimed the AR-15 is the "weapon of choice of mass murderers" are ripe for a lawsuit.

 

[Cosmo]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

They'll ban it and it will stay banned until SCOTUS gets to it. Just leftist bad actors passing laws they know are unconstitutional and hoping to overload SCOTUS. At the end of the day it will needlessly hassle law-abiding gun owners who will need to quickly sell or hand in their guns at a steep discount or for free, while violent criminals who didn't give a shit about the law before this will continue committing crime as usual. Leftists will be happy and gloat at this result.

 

[Rich2018]

And why exactly should Glock be punished for the actions of this lunatic?

For their negligence.

 

[noonereal]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

I give up, why is it idiotic?

 

[Noodlegawd]

Pretty idiotic to think this suit or ban will get anywhere.

Brooklyn subway mass shooting victims sue Glock over rampage, arguing gunmaker is at fault

Furong Hu and Zhuoxuan Ye were among 10 shot when James, 62, opened fire with his legally purchased Glock 17 9mm handgun, they said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the gunmaker.

nypost.com

MSN

Another one of the many issues with this country is that you can sue pretty much anyone, for pretty much anything, with little or no consequences if you lose.

 

[noonereal]

Ford should be sued by the victims in New Orleans, where the guy used one of their products in a mass killing.

Ford markets their trucks as vehicles capable of surmounting obstacles in their path. Like pedestrians.

This with ridiculous equivalence i see.

It hurts, i mean hurts, to read such stupidity.

You literally don't underhand what flawed logic this is.

This is exactly why i what critical thing taught as a core course starting in 1st grade.
We would not have posts like this if it was required.

 

[RF667799]

For their negligence.

How do an individual's deliberate, unlawful actions equate to negligence on the part of an uninvolved third party, selling their legal product in accordance with the laws of, and under the close supervision of the federal and state governments?

 

[RF667799]

This with ridiculous equivalence i see.

It hurts, i mean hurts, to read such stupidity.

You literally don't underhand what flawed logic this is.

This is exactly why i what critical thing taught as a core course starting in 1st grade.
We would not have posts like this if it was required.

You neglected to explain why the logic is flawed, in your haste to rant about the post.

 

[Rich2018]

This with ridiculous equivalence i see.

It hurts, i mean hurts, to read such stupidity.

You literally don't underhand what flawed logic this is.

This is exactly why i what critical thing taught as a core course starting in 1st grade.
We would not have posts like this if it was required.

Then again, this is from the poster who thinks cars are designed to kill.

 

[RF667799]

Then again, this is from the poster who thinks cars are designed to kill.

Then again, you're lying.

Ever notice how you rarely talk to me, but scarcely a day goes by that you don't talk about me, often including a lie?

 

[Grizzly Adams]

Yep, and now this:



How, exactly, could Glock (or any gun other manufacturer) prevent rappers, or other entertainers from mentioning or using their products?

I'm also curious to know if they included the referenced musical acts or production studios in the lawsuit and, if not, why not.

Ludacris: "I got my twin Glock forties, cocked back."
House of Pain: "I'm cockin' my Glock and I got my shillelagh."
(The widespread lack of knowledge regarding Glock's striker-fired design among people who sing about their prowess with it always makes me chuckle.)

 

[noonereal]

You neglected to explain why the logic is flawed, in your haste to rant about the post.

Maybe a thinking cap would help ?

 

[noonereal]

Then again, this is from the poster who thinks cars are designed to kill.

It is so ****in stupid it deserves no explanation.

 

[braindrain]

I give up, why is it idiotic?

Why am I not surprised you lack the ability to comprehend why this suit is idiotic.

The saddest part is it is not even that complicated. And yet you still cant get it.

 

[aociswundumho]

Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible.

 

[braindrain]

Maybe a thinking cap would help ?

And yet you can’t explain how it is flawed logic.

And I hate to tell you this but this little bit you put on, it’s not fooling anyone.

 

[Lord of Planar]

This with ridiculous equivalence i see.

It hurts, i mean hurts, to read such stupidity.

You literally don't underhand what flawed logic this is.

This is exactly why i what critical thing taught as a core course starting in 1st grade.
We would not have posts like this if it was required.

It is ridiculous you do not see the facts.

 

[RF667799]

Maybe a thinking cap would help ?

That's two...